IRCCourt RulingsOct 19, 1981
…sions of this Court, Garland v. Commissioner, 73 T.C. 5 (1979), and Kiddie v. Commissioner, 69 T.C. 1055 (1978).
Petitioner’s factual arguments are without merit. Renato testified that it was his brother’s wish that he acquire a controlling interest in A & R and that was the only reason for his acquisition of A & R’s s…
IRCCourt RulingsMar 5, 1987
…al was an employee or an independent contractor. Thomas Kiddie, M.D., Inc. v. Commissioner, 69 T.C. 1055 (1978); Ellison v. Commissioner, 55 T.C. 142 (1970); James v. Commissioner, 25 T.C. 1296 (1956); Hand v. Commissioner, 16 T.C. 1410 (1951). A third and more applicable classification exists, that of officer. The Sup…
IRCCourt RulingsOct 3, 1995related by meaning
ch amount is received shall be
increased by an amount equal to 10 percent of the
portion of such amount which is includible in gross
income.
- 18 -
16 We also observe that the Transfer Refund was paid to
petitioner "on account of" his election to transfer from the
Retirement System to the Pension System and not "on acc…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 22, 1994
…Contractors, Inc., 458 U.S. 564, 571 (1982); United States v. Mansfield Tire & Rubber Co., 942 F.2d 1055, 1058 (6th Cir. 1991). Here, we do not find respondent’s interpretation of section 419A(c)(2) to be unreasonable. Quite the opposite, as the case now before us clearly demonstrates, this interpretation is necessary …
IRCCourt RulingsJul 6, 2022related by meaning
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo. 2022-69
CLAIR R. COUT URIER, JR. ,
Petitioner
v .
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent
—————
Docket N o. 19714-16. Filed July 6, 2022.
—————
Alvah Lavar Taylor and Daniel W. Soto , for petitioner.
Laura A. Price, Hilary E. March , Noelle White, Patricia P. Wang , and
Edward T.…
IRCCourt RulingsNov 7, 1996related by meaning
T.C. Memo. 1996-502
UNITED STATES TAX COURT
ELAINE S. BENNETT, Petitioner v
.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Docket No. 8545-96. Filed November 7, 1996.
Vernon E. Robbins
, for petitioner.
Alan R. Peregoy
, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAWSON, Judge
: This case was assigned to Special Trial
Judge Ro…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 26, 1984related by meaning
shall not apply to amounts described in clause (ii) of subparagraph (A) of section 72(mX5) to the extent that section 72(mX5) applies to such amounts. (J) Unrealized appreciation op employer securities. — In the case of any distribution including securities of the employer corporation which, without regard to the requi…
IRCCourt RulingsFeb 15, 2002related by meaning
tioner’s 1998
Federal income tax and an addition to tax under section
6651(a)(1) of $3,433 and $321, respectively. After concessions
by the parties,
2 the issues are (1) whether petitioner is liable
for the additional tax under section 72(t) and (2) whether
petitioner is liable for the addition to tax under section
665…
IRCCourt RulingsMay 9, 1988related by meaning
e reasons stated herein, respondent former trustees’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction will be granted.
An appropriate order will be entered. These cases were assigned pursuant to sec. 7456 (redesignated as sec. 7443A by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1556, 100 Stat. 2755) and Rule 180. All s…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 8, 1996related by meaning
to the Internal Revenue
Code by section 302 of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2, Pub. L.
104-168, authorizes this Court to review the Secretary's failure to abate interest with respect to requests for abatement after
July 30, 1996. Because this case does not involve a request for
abatement after July 30, 1996, we lack jur…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 3, 2013related by meaning
T.C. Summary Jpinion 2013-42
UNITED STATES TAX COURT
ASTER TIRF E, Petitioner v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTE 1NAL REVENUE, Respondent
Docket No. 25865-10S. Filed June 3, 2013.
Aster Tirfe, pro se.
Steven Roth, for respondent.
SUMMARlY OPINION
CARLUZZO, Special Trial Judge This case was heard pursuant to the
provisions of sect…
IRCCourt RulingsSep 13, 1990related by meaning
as to utilize the estate tax unified credit to its fullest extent.
Kenneth G. Coveney, for the petitioner.
William H. Quealy, Jr., for the respondent. Nims, Chief Judge. Korner, Hamblen, Cohen, Clapp, Swift, Wright, Parr, and Colvin, JJ., agree with the majority. Chabot, J., concurring *88 in the result. Hamblen and Wh…
IRCCourt RulingsMar 31, 1961related by meaning
ntract” as meaning the entire contract, especially since Congress, when it wished to delineate the annuity feature of the contract, did so explicitly. Although admitting that the interpretation proposed by petitioner is not without merit, we hold that section 72(d) applies only when the entire consideration furnished b…
IRCCourt RulingsMar 27, 1989related by meaning
ended returns, The conditions were not met, and it was not an abuse of discretion to disqualify the plan.
Revocation of Favorable Determination Letter The Supreme Court has held that the Commissioner has broad discretion under section 7805(b) in deciding whether to revoke a ruling retroactively, and that his determinat…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 30, 2006related by meaning
104(a)(2) does not apply to exclude from gross income the
ordinary disability retirement benefits received by petitioners
in taxable year 2000.
- 15 - 4. Sections 104(a)(3) and 105
Section 104(a)(3) generally excludes from gross income
amounts received by an employee through employer-provided
accident or health insuran…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 13, 1995related by meaning
ere the detriment is very severe. Beneficial Life Ins. Co. v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 627, 642 (1982); see also CWT Farms, Inc. v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 1054, 1068-1069 (1982) (retroactive application of a regulation was sustained where the taxpayer unjustifiably relied on a handbook published by respondent for guidance)…
IRCCourt RulingsOct 20, 2003related by meaning
result apparently so at
odds with accepted tax policy.” Darby v. Commissioner
, supra
at
68.
We find that petitioner did not have a basis in the 1999 distribution from his section 401(k) plan, and that petitioner
properly included the full distribution in his 1999 gross income.
Accordingly, we hold that petitioner is l…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 8, 1980related by meaning
minations should also be within our jurisdiction. Regardless of the logic of petitioners’ position, we are constrained to deny their motion to vacate. The United States Tax Court has limited jurisdiction. See sec. 7442. Under this jurisdictional umbrella fall generally income, estate, gift, and miscellaneous excise tax…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 24, 1991related by meaning
and sec. 1011A(b)(l) of the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-647, 102 Stat. 3342, 3472), do not affect the instant case.] Sec. 1.72-8. Effect of certain employer contributions with respect to premiums or other consideration paid or contributed by an employee, (a) Contributions in the nature…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 31, 1973related by meaning
for any payment of any specific amount to any employee until the conditions of that employee having medical services or being away from work occurred. In Simplified Tax Records, Inc., 41 T.C. 75, 79 (1963), in disallowing a deduction to the taxpayer for a reserve for the estimated future cost of preparing subscribers’ …