Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to ERISA 2003 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
70 documents · 0.27sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 75 FR 9360 — Investment Advice-Participants and Beneficiaries
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Mar 2, 2010related by meaning
    …er and ( printed page 9365) responsibilities among the various levels of government. Section 514 of ERISA provides, with certain exceptions specifically enumerated, that the provisions of Titles I and IV of ERISA supersede any and all laws of the States as they relate to any employee benefit plan covered under ERISA. T…
  2. 85 FR 55219 — Fiduciary Duties Regarding Proxy Voting and Shareholder Rights
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Sep 4, 2020related by meaning
    xy voting policy are consistent with Title I of ERISA and this section before deciding to retain the investment manager. * * * * * (g) Effective date. This section shall be effective on [30 days after date of publication of final rule]. (h) Severability. Should a court of competent jurisdiction hold any provision(s) of…
  3. Rev. Proc. 2005-3 — Areas in which rulings will not be issued (domestic areas). This procedure provides a revised list of those provisions of the Code under the jurisdiction of th…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 3, 2005
    …approval), as clarified and modified by Notice 2002-72, 2002-2 C.B. 843, and modified by Rev. Proc. 2003-34, 2003-1 C.B. 856, and Rev. Proc. 2003-79, 2003-2 C.B. 1036; Rev. Proc. 2002-37, 2002-1 C.B. 1030 (certain corporations), as clarified and modified by Notice 2002-72 and modified by Rev. Proc. 2003-34; Rev. Proc. …
  4. 85 FR 72934 — Registration Requirements for Pooled Plan Providers
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Nov 16, 2020related by meaning
    …. Back to Citation 29.  84 FR 37508 (July 31, 2019) (Definition of “Employer” Under Section 3(5) of ERISA—Association Retirement Plans and Other Multiple-Employer Plans); see also 83 FR28912 (June 21, 2018) (Definition of “Employer” Under Section 3(5) of ERISA—Association Health Plans). Back to Citation 30.
  5. T.C. Summary Opinion 2017-57 — Gregory J. Gowen v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 24, 2017
    …y installments due at the end of each month. After making all monthly payments due through July 31, 2003, the participant fails to make the payment due on August 31, 2003 or any other monthly payments due thereafter. The plan administrator allows a threemonth [sic] cure period. (ii) As a result of the failure to satisf…
  6. ERISA § 4050(e) (29 U.S.C. § 1350) — Missing participants
    PBGCCode / StatuteJan 6, 2017related by meaning
    (e) (e) Regulatory authority The corporation shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry out the purposes of this section, including rules relating to what will be considered a diligent search, the amount payable to the corporation, and the amount to be paid by the corporation.
  7. IRCCourt RulingsAug 3, 1979related by meaning
    …n 2002 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (hereinafter sometimes referred to as ERISA), Pub. L. 93-406, 88 Stat. 958. Examination of the legislative history makes it clear that the Congress was concerned about strengthening employee benefit arrangements, largely to be sure that benefits that appeare…
  8. T.C. Memo. 2010-61 — Wendy W. Bozick v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 30, 2010
    … Cir .''2004) . . It is uncontested that Bozick satisfies the .threshold conditions of Rev . Proc . 2003-61, sec . 4 .01, 2003-2 C .B . 296, 297-298 . But Bozick fails to qualify,for relief under Rev . Proc . 2003-61, sec . 4 .02, 2003-2 C .B . at 298, because, as we explain later, Bozick had reason to know the 2003 li…
  9. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION v. BAKERY AND CONFECTIONERY WORKERS LOCAL 125 HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND
    ERISACourt RulingsApr 12, 1995related by meaning
    …icious manner based on respondent's actions and the entire compliance record in this case. [Page 2] ERISA is a comprehensive statute adopted by Congress after careful study of employee benefit plans. Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 451 U.S. 504, 510 (1981). Its provisions are remedial in nature and were designed t…
  10. T.D. 9081 — REG-129709-03 Temporary and proposed regulations under section 409(p) of the Code provide guidance concerning the requirements for employee stock ownership pla…
    IRCTreasury DecisionsSep 2, 2003
    …bchapter S corporations. A public hearing on the proposed regulations is scheduled for November 20, 2003. REG-108639-99 REG-108639-99 Proposed regulations under sections 401(k) and 401(m) of the Code provide guidance on the requirements for certain retirement plans containing cash or deferred arrangements and providing…
  11. 81 FR 40548 — Deferred Compensation Plans of State and Local Governments and Tax-Exempt Entities
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jun 22, 2016
    …ection 457 does not apply to certain nonelective deferred compensation of nonemployees. On July 11, 2003, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued final regulations under section 457 (TD 9075) (68 FR 41230) (2003 final regulations). The 2003 final regulations provide guidance on deferred compensation plans of eligibl…
  12. 76 FR 76222 — Filings Required of Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements and Certain Other Related Entities
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Dec 6, 2011related by meaning
    …ortability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936) (1996)) (HIPAA) amended ERISA to provide for, among other things, improved portability and continuity of health insurance coverage. HIPAA also added section 101(g) to ERISA, 29 U.S.C. 1021(g), providing the Secretary with the authority to requi…
  13. 84 FR 56894 — Default Electronic Disclosure by Employee Pension Benefit Plans Under ERISA
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Oct 23, 2019related by meaning
    rs and their service providers comply with amendments to ERISA's pension benefit statement requirements made by the Pension Protection Act of 2006.[6] FAB 2006-03, in relevant part, provides that when pension plans give participants continuous access to benefit statement information through one or more secure websites,…
  14. 83 FR 614 — Definition of “Employer” Under Section 3(5) of ERISA-Association Health Plans
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 5, 2018related by meaning
    …ing when employers may join together in a group or association to sponsor a group health plan under ERISA, is likely to have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, the Department provides its IRFA of the proposed rule, below. Need for and Objectives of the Rule
  15. TR 2026-02 — Technical Release 2026-02
    ERISADOL Technical ReleasesJun 17, 2026related by meaning
    …e whole law, and to its object and policy” in deciding what type of benefit programs are covered by ERISA). ↩ See FAB 2004-01 (April 7, 2004) and FAB 2006-02 (October 27, 2006) which came to similar conclusions regarding employers’ involvement with Health Savings Accounts. ↩ 29 C.F.R. 2510.3-2(d)(1)(iii). ↩ See Interpr…
  16. T.C. Memo. 2012-104 — Jerald W. & Claudia K. White v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 11, 2012
    …19 plan) in 2001 and 2002 and to the Millennium Multiple Welfare Benefit Trust (Millennium plan) in 2003, and respondent's 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in effect for the years at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Proc…
  17. ERISA § 4241 (29 U.S.C. § 1421) — §§1421 to 1425. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–235, div. O, title I, §108(a)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2786
    PBGCCode / StatuteJan 5, 2015related by meaning
    §§1421 to 1425. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–235, div. O, title I, §108(a)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2786
  18. T.C. Memo. 2011-110 — Michael Rosenfeld v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 23, 2011
    d to an SEP plan on the basis of these earnings.6 In 2003 he contributed $12,242 to his SEP plan. In the notice of deficiency respondent determined in pertinent part that petitioner was:; (1)- A common law employee of the BCG and consequently was not entitled to report gross receipts and expenses associated with his wo…
  19. T.C. Summary Opinion 2008-1 — Shawn Timothy Hynes v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 2, 2008
    ork City to Palo Alto . Petitioner timely filed his 2003 Federal income tax return . Petitioner reported wages, salaries, and tips on his return . His wages of $51,304 were earned from his employment at STB from September through December of 2003 . Respondent received the following third party information for petitione…
  20. T.C. Memo. 2009-100 — Peter I. & Daria A. Basalyk v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 14, 2009
    …of the Memphis and Forest Lakes properties were $92,480 and $53,880, respectively . Tax Years 2002, 2003, and 200 4 During 2002, 2003, and 2004 petitioner Daria A . Basalyk (Mrs . Basalyk) was an employee of the Brecksville-Broadview Heights Board of Education . Petitioner Peter I . Basalyk (Mr . Basalyk) was an employ…