Rev. Rul. 2004-67 — Group or pooled trusts; participation; tax-exempt status, model language. This ruling provides that a governmental section 457(b) plan may invest in a second t… IRCRevenue RulingsJul 12, 2004related by meaning
…mination letter issued to it prior to July 12, 2004, regarding eligibility of its group trust under Rev. Rul. 81-100 will not lose its right to rely on its determination letter merely because it adopts Model Amendment 1 set forth above in this revenue ruling on a word-for-word basis (or adopts an amendment that is subs…
67 T.C. 490 — Wisconsin Nipple & Fabricating Corp. v. Commissioner IRCCourt RulingsDec 16, 1976
…y of the profit-sharing plan, together with the required data, to the District Director of Internal Revenue, Milwaukee, Wis., for a determination whether the plan qualified under section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and whether the profit-sharing trust was exempt under section 501. After the petitioner supp…
50 T.C. 771 — New England Tank Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner IRCCourt RulingsAug 26, 1968
erests under the contract. On January 15, 1960, NET, petitioner, and the Government entered into an agreement whereby this assignment was effectuated. On January 19, 1960, petitioner, as successor in interest of NET, the First National Bank of Boston, and J. F. White Contracting Co., petitioner’s subcontractor, entered…
IRCCourt RulingsMay 27, 1968related by meaning
…ther cases. Decisions will be entered under Rude 60.
All Code references herein are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.
Petitioner points to Rev. Rul. 66—12, 1966— 1 C.B. 72, where respondent approved a salaried-only classification with respect to an employer who had S3 hourly paid employees and 26 salaried employees…
Rev. Proc. 2013-8 — User fees for employee plans and exempt organizations. Current guidance for complying with the user fee program of the Service as it pertains to requests for l… IRCRevenue ProceduresModified Jan 2, 2013
etermination Rev. Proc. 93-41
Adoption agreement Rev. Proc. 2011-49
Advisory letter Rev. Procs. 2011-49, 2013-6
Basic plan document Rev. Proc. 2011-49 Determination letter Rev. Procs. 2013-6, 2013-9
Dual-purpose IRA Rev. Procs. 98-59, 2010-48
Group exemption letter Rev. Proc. 80-27
Information letter Rev. Proc. 2013-4
…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsSep 29, 2017related by meaning
…nd accompanied by a penalty of perjury st atement executed
by an appropriate party, as specified in Rev. Proc. 2017-1, 2017-1 I.R.B. 1,
§ 7.01(15)(b). T his office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the
request for ruling, and such material is subject to verification on e xamination. The
Assoc…
Rev. Proc. 2014-4 — Rulings and information letters; issuance procedures. Revised procedures are provided for furnishing ruling letters, information letters, etc., on matters rela… IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2014related by meaning
mpt status of a plan or account is granted, denied, or revoked or the portion of any document in which technical advice with respect thereto is given; (iv) Any application filed and any document issued by the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the qualification or status of EP master and prototype plans; and
(v) …
Rev. Rul. 2006-43 — Government pick-up plans; employer contributions; income tax; prospective application. This ruling describes the actions required for a state or its political … IRCRevenue RulingsAug 28, 2006
…contributions to meet the requirements set forth above in paragraph (1) of Law and Analysis in this revenue ruling. The relief provided above for “pick-ups” implemented prior to August 28, 2006, applies only if the actions taken otherwise complied with Rev. Rul. 81-35, Rev. Rul. 81-36, and Rev. Rul. 87-10, and only if …
Rev. Proc. 2014-8 — User fees for employee plans and exempt organizations. Current guidance for complying with the user fee program of the Service as it pertains to requests for l… IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2014
istrative scrutiny determination
Rev. Proc. 93–41
Adoption agreement
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22
Advisory letter
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22, 2014–6 Basic plan document
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22
Determination letter
Rev. Procs. 2014–6, 2014–9
Dual-purpose IRA
Rev. Procs. 98–59, 2010–48
Group exemption letter
Rev. …
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsDec 14, 2018related by meaning
l revoke or modify a letter ruling and apply the revocation
retroactively if there has been a misstatement or omission of controlling facts; the facts at the time of the transaction are materially different from t he controlling facts on which
the ruling was based; or, in the case of a transaction involving a continuin…
Rev. Rul. 2014-24 — This revenue ruling modifies the list of group trust retiree benefit plans eligible to participate in 81–100 group trusts in accordance with the requirements o… IRCRevenue RulingsSep 8, 2014
…splaced by the disaster and modifies other requirements of § 142(d) to accommodate this suspension.
Rev. Proc. 2014–51 Rev. Proc. 2014–51 This revenue procedure provides guidance on certain aspects of an entity’s qualification as a real estate investment trust (REIT) in the context of transactions involving debt secure…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJan 3, 2020related by meaning
…and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party, as specified in Rev. Proc. 2019-1, 2019-1 I.R.B. 1,
§ 7.01(16)(b). This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the
requ est for a ruling, and such material is subject to verification on examination. The
Asso…
Notice 2026-33 — This notice provides guidance with respect to section 334 of Division T of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Pub. L. 117-328, 136 Stat. 3559 (2022), k… IRCNoticesJun 8, 2026
term rate is set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 467.—Certain Payments for the Use of Property or Services The applicable federal short-term, mid-term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 468.—Special Rules f…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMay 8, 2015
. Rev. Rul. 77-85, 1977-1 C.B. 12, Rev. Rul. 80-274, 1980-2 C.B. 27,
Rev. Rul. 81-225, Rev. Rul. 82-54, 1982-1 C.B. 11, Rev. Rul. 2003-91, 2003-2 C.B. 347, and Rev. Rul. 2003-92, 2003-2 C.B. 350. The rulings stand for the proposition that
contract holders possessing control over the investment of the separate account a…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsAug 27, 1999
…al
or is not relevant to the issue presented in this
technical advice request.
5
The application of Rev. Rul. 54-608 was delayed by Rev. Rul. 55-246,
1955-1 C.B. 68; Rev. Rul. 56-315, 1956-2 C.B. 304; Rev. Rul. 57-28, 1957-1
C.B. 193; and Rev. Rul. 57-325, 1957-2 C.B. 302. Congress further delayed the
application of Re…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJul 19, 2002related by meaning
…orary or final regulations are inconsistent with any
conclusion in the ruling. See section 12.04 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1, 2001-1 I.R.B. 1, 46. However, when the criteria in section 12.05 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1 are satisfied, a ruling
is not revoked or modified retroactively except in rare or unusual circumstances.
Sincerely…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsOct 13, 2006
…ge for such insurance is unreasonably large in
relation to the total charges under the contract.
In Rev. Rul. 75-302 , 1975-2 C.B. 86, Rev. Rul. 75-303, 1975-2 C.B. 87, and Rev. Rul. 76 -
481, 1976-2 C.B. 82, taxpayers were allowed a current deduction of payments for future medical
care extendi ng substantially beyond …
IRCCourt RulingsApr 12, 1976
…f simplicity the partial termination of the plan is referred to as the termination of the plan.
See Rev. Rul. 58-94, 1958-1 C.B. 194; Rev. Rul. 58-95, 1958-1 C.B. 197; Rev. Rul. 58-96,1958-1 C.B. 200; Rev. Rul. 58-97,1958-1 C.B. 201; Rev. Rul. 58-98,1958-1 C.B. 202; Rev. Rul. 58-383,1958-2 C.B. 149; Rev. Rul. 65-147,19…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsSep 12, 2003related by meaning
…ssues addressed in this
ruling have not yet been adopted. Therefore, this ruling may be modified or revoked if
the adopted temporary or final regulations are inconsistent with any conclusions in the
ruling. See section 12.04 of Rev. Proc. 2003-1, 2003-1 I.R.B. 1, 44. However, when the
criteria in section 12.06 of Rev. …
Notice 2014-19 — The purpose of this notice is to provide guidance on the application (including the retroactive application) of the decision in United States v. Windsor, 570 U… IRCNoticesApr 21, 2014
…, must a qualified retirement plan be amended to reflect the outcome of Windsor and the guidance in Rev. Rul. 2013–17 and this notice?
A–4. Whether a plan must be amended to reflect the outcome of Windsor and the guidance in Rev. Rul. 2013–17 and this notice depends on the terms of the specific plan, as described in Q&…