Rev. Rul. 2004-67 — Group or pooled trusts; participation; tax-exempt status, model language. This ruling provides that a governmental section 457(b) plan may invest in a second t… IRCRevenue RulingsJul 12, 2004related by meaning
…mination letter issued to it prior to July 12, 2004, regarding eligibility of its group trust under Rev. Rul. 81-100 will not lose its right to rely on its determination letter merely because it adopts Model Amendment 1 set forth above in this revenue ruling on a word-for-word basis (or adopts an amendment that is subs…
PLR 202524006 — Qualified Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Stock Bonus Plan IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJun 13, 2025
…“group t rust retiree benefit plans,” are qualified retirement plans under § 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code); governmental retiree benefit
plans under § 401(a)(24); certain custodial accounts under § 403(b)(7); retirement
income accounts under § 403(b)(9 ); IRAs that are exempt under § 408(e); eligible
gover…
IRCCourt RulingsSep 19, 1978related by meaning
…d part of our analysis, relating to the effect of unforeseen circumstances on respondent’s right to revoke his prior ruling. Respondent has publicly announced that a ruling will, in the absence of unusual circumstances, not be revoked retroactively. Statement of Procedural Rules, 26 C.F.R. sec. 601.201 (1977); Rev. Pro…
Notice 2014-19 — The purpose of this notice is to provide guidance on the application (including the retroactive application) of the decision in United States v. Windsor, 570 U… IRCNoticesApr 21, 2014★ strong match
…, must a qualified retirement plan be amended to reflect the outcome of Windsor and the guidance in Rev. Rul. 2013–17 and this notice?
A–4. Whether a plan must be amended to reflect the outcome of Windsor and the guidance in Rev. Rul. 2013–17 and this notice depends on the terms of the specific plan, as described in Q&…
IRCCourt RulingsMar 11, 1975related by meaning
… therein. In Andrew A. Sandor, 62 T.C. 469,481 (1974), we stated: The purpose of the publication of revenue rulings is to publish the official interpretation of the Revenue Service of certain laws as applied to certain circumstances in order to promote uniform application of the tax laws by Service employees and to adv…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsFeb 5, 1999
ions.
Various revenue rulings have considered the tax consequences of nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. Rev. Rul.
60-31, Situations 1-3 , 1960-1 C.B. 174, holds that a mere promise to pay, not represented by notes or secured in any way, does not
constitute receipt of income within the meaning of the cash…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMar 26, 1999
ion arrangements. Rev. Rul. 60-31, Situations 1-3
, 1960-1 C.B.
174, holds that a mere promise to pay, not represented by notes or secured in any way, does not constitute receipt of income within the meaning of the cash receipts and
disbursements method of accounting. See also, Rev. Rul. 69-650, 1969-2 C.B. 106,
and Re…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 25, 1968related by meaning
…rence F. Buckley, 29 T.C. 455 (1957). We recognize that the Commissioner issued in 1958 a series of revenue rulings on the question of “separation from the service” as related to corporate acquisitions. See Rev. Ruls. 58-94, 58-95, 58-96, 58-97, 58-98, 58-99, 1958-1 C.B. 194-204. The revenue ruling most like this case …
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMar 12, 1999
…he taxpayer's control of its receipt is subject to
substantial limitations or restrictions.
Various revenue rulings have considered the tax consequences of nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. Rev. Rul.
60-31, Situations 1-3
, 1960-1 C.B. 174, holds that a mere promise to pay, not represented by notes or se…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJun 29, 2018related by meaning
…and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party, as specified in Rev. Proc. 2018-1, 2018-1 I.R.B. 1,
§ 7.01(16) (b). This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the
request for ruling, and such material is subject to verification on examination. The
Associ…
67 T.C. 490 — Wisconsin Nipple & Fabricating Corp. v. Commissioner IRCCourt RulingsDec 16, 1976
…y of the profit-sharing plan, together with the required data, to the District Director of Internal Revenue, Milwaukee, Wis., for a determination whether the plan qualified under section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and whether the profit-sharing trust was exempt under section 501. After the petitioner supp…
50 T.C. 771 — New England Tank Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner IRCCourt RulingsAug 26, 1968
erests under the contract. On January 15, 1960, NET, petitioner, and the Government entered into an agreement whereby this assignment was effectuated. On January 19, 1960, petitioner, as successor in interest of NET, the First National Bank of Boston, and J. F. White Contracting Co., petitioner’s subcontractor, entered…
Rev. Rul. 2004-12 — Plan qualification; rollovers. This ruling describes a situation where an eligible retirement plan separately accounts for amounts attributable to rollover con… IRCRevenue RulingsFeb 17, 2004related by meaning
…es and between § 457 eligible governmental plans.
DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this revenue ruling is Roger Kuehnle of the Employee Plans, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. For further information regarding this revenue ruling, please contact Employee Plans’ taxpayer assistance telephone serv…
Rev. Proc. 2013-8 — User fees for employee plans and exempt organizations. Current guidance for complying with the user fee program of the Service as it pertains to requests for l… IRCRevenue ProceduresModified Jan 2, 2013
etermination Rev. Proc. 93-41
Adoption agreement Rev. Proc. 2011-49
Advisory letter Rev. Procs. 2011-49, 2013-6
Basic plan document Rev. Proc. 2011-49 Determination letter Rev. Procs. 2013-6, 2013-9
Dual-purpose IRA Rev. Procs. 98-59, 2010-48
Group exemption letter Rev. Proc. 80-27
Information letter Rev. Proc. 2013-4
…
Rev. Rul. 2006-43 — Government pick-up plans; employer contributions; income tax; prospective application. This ruling describes the actions required for a state or its political … IRCRevenue RulingsAug 28, 2006
…contributions to meet the requirements set forth above in paragraph (1) of Law and Analysis in this revenue ruling. The relief provided above for “pick-ups” implemented prior to August 28, 2006, applies only if the actions taken otherwise complied with Rev. Rul. 81-35, Rev. Rul. 81-36, and Rev. Rul. 87-10, and only if …
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJul 19, 2002related by meaning
…orary or final regulations are inconsistent with any
conclusion in the ruling. See section 12.04 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1, 2001-1 I.R.B. 1, 46. However, when the criteria in section 12.05 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1 are satisfied, a ruling
is not revoked or modified retroactively except in rare or unusual circumstances.
Sincerely…
Rev. Proc. 2014-8 — User fees for employee plans and exempt organizations. Current guidance for complying with the user fee program of the Service as it pertains to requests for l… IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2014
istrative scrutiny determination
Rev. Proc. 93–41
Adoption agreement
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22
Advisory letter
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22, 2014–6 Basic plan document
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22
Determination letter
Rev. Procs. 2014–6, 2014–9
Dual-purpose IRA
Rev. Procs. 98–59, 2010–48
Group exemption letter
Rev. …
Notice 2026-33 — This notice provides guidance with respect to section 334 of Division T of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Pub. L. 117-328, 136 Stat. 3559 (2022), k… IRCNoticesJun 8, 2026
term rate is set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 467.—Certain Payments for the Use of Property or Services The applicable federal short-term, mid-term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 468.—Special Rules f…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMar 16, 2018related by meaning
…and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party, as specified in Rev. Proc. 2017-1, 2017-1 I.R.B. 1,
§ 7.01(15)(b). This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the
request for ruling, and such material is subject to verification on examination. The
Associa…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMay 8, 2015
. Rev. Rul. 77-85, 1977-1 C.B. 12, Rev. Rul. 80-274, 1980-2 C.B. 27,
Rev. Rul. 81-225, Rev. Rul. 82-54, 1982-1 C.B. 11, Rev. Rul. 2003-91, 2003-2 C.B. 347, and Rev. Rul. 2003-92, 2003-2 C.B. 350. The rulings stand for the proposition that
contract holders possessing control over the investment of the separate account a…