Rev. Proc. 2011-6 — Employee plans determination letters. Revised procedures are provided for issuing determination letters on the qualified status of employee plans under section… IRCRevenue ProceduresSuperseded Jan 3, 2011
.02 A request for a determination letter on the status of a group trust as described in Rev. Rul. 81-100 is made by submitting a written request demonstrating how the group trust satisfies the five criteria listed in Rev. Rul. 81-100, together with the trust instrument and related documents. Rev. Rul. 2004-67 extends t…
PLR 202524006 — Qualified Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Stock Bonus Plan IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJun 13, 2025
…“group t rust retiree benefit plans,” are qualified retirement plans under § 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code); governmental retiree benefit
plans under § 401(a)(24); certain custodial accounts under § 403(b)(7); retirement
income accounts under § 403(b)(9 ); IRAs that are exempt under § 408(e); eligible
gover…
IRCCourt RulingsMay 27, 1968related by meaning
…ther cases. Decisions will be entered under Rude 60.
All Code references herein are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.
Petitioner points to Rev. Rul. 66—12, 1966— 1 C.B. 72, where respondent approved a salaried-only classification with respect to an employer who had S3 hourly paid employees and 26 salaried employees…
PLR 200202027 — Annuities Purchased by Section 501(c)(3) Organizations or Public Schools IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJan 11, 2002related by meaning
…orary or final regulations are inconsistent with any
conclusion in the ruling. See section 12.04 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1, 2001-1 I.R.B. 1, 46. However, when the criteria in section 12.05 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1 are satisfied, a ruling
is not revoked or modified retroactively except in rare or unusual circumstances.
Sincerely…
IRCCourt RulingsOct 2, 1974
…4.15 (plus interest not herein material) to Marine Midland Trust Co. of Rochester, N.Y., which had previously qualified as successor trustee of the B-G plan. This sum represented the entire amount accrued on the books of B-G which had not previously been actually paid under the plan.
The following is a transcript of de…
Rev. Proc. 2013-8 — User fees for employee plans and exempt organizations. Current guidance for complying with the user fee program of the Service as it pertains to requests for l… IRCRevenue ProceduresModified Jan 2, 2013
etermination Rev. Proc. 93-41
Adoption agreement Rev. Proc. 2011-49
Advisory letter Rev. Procs. 2011-49, 2013-6
Basic plan document Rev. Proc. 2011-49 Determination letter Rev. Procs. 2013-6, 2013-9
Dual-purpose IRA Rev. Procs. 98-59, 2010-48
Group exemption letter Rev. Proc. 80-27
Information letter Rev. Proc. 2013-4
…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 25, 1968related by meaning
…rence F. Buckley, 29 T.C. 455 (1957). We recognize that the Commissioner issued in 1958 a series of revenue rulings on the question of “separation from the service” as related to corporate acquisitions. See Rev. Ruls. 58-94, 58-95, 58-96, 58-97, 58-98, 58-99, 1958-1 C.B. 194-204. The revenue ruling most like this case …
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsFeb 5, 1999
ions.
Various revenue rulings have considered the tax consequences of nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. Rev. Rul.
60-31, Situations 1-3 , 1960-1 C.B. 174, holds that a mere promise to pay, not represented by notes or secured in any way, does not
constitute receipt of income within the meaning of the cash…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMar 26, 1999
ion arrangements. Rev. Rul. 60-31, Situations 1-3
, 1960-1 C.B.
174, holds that a mere promise to pay, not represented by notes or secured in any way, does not constitute receipt of income within the meaning of the cash receipts and
disbursements method of accounting. See also, Rev. Rul. 69-650, 1969-2 C.B. 106,
and Re…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMar 12, 1999
…he taxpayer's control of its receipt is subject to
substantial limitations or restrictions.
Various revenue rulings have considered the tax consequences of nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. Rev. Rul.
60-31, Situations 1-3
, 1960-1 C.B. 174, holds that a mere promise to pay, not represented by notes or se…
IRCCourt RulingsApr 25, 1972
…at the distribution of all funds of a pension trust to the employee participants, each of whom has previously executed and who thereafter carries out a legally enforceable agreement to pay over his distributive share to a new pension trust which, like the former, constitutes a qualified trust under section 401(a) of th…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsOct 21, 2016
… applies to
nonqualified plans of deferred compensation, including excess benefit plans, in various
revenue rulings. In Rev. Rul. 60-31, Situations 1 – 3, the Service held that a mere
promise to pay, not represented by notes or secured in any way, does not constitute
receipt of income by a cash basis taxpayer. Rev. Rul…
Rev. Rul. 2006-43 — Government pick-up plans; employer contributions; income tax; prospective application. This ruling describes the actions required for a state or its political … IRCRevenue RulingsAug 28, 2006
…contributions to meet the requirements set forth above in paragraph (1) of Law and Analysis in this revenue ruling. The relief provided above for “pick-ups” implemented prior to August 28, 2006, applies only if the actions taken otherwise complied with Rev. Rul. 81-35, Rev. Rul. 81-36, and Rev. Rul. 87-10, and only if …
IRCCourt RulingsNov 15, 2004related by meaning
…1-552, 6, 28-29 (1969), 1969-3 C.B. 426, 442-443; also see Staff of the Joint Committee
on Internal Revenue Taxation, General Explanation of the Tax
Reform Act of 1969 (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the TRA
'69 Blue Book) 3, 30-31. The Senate Finance Committee described
its conclusions as follows:
9 Sec. 503 of …
Rev. Proc. 2014-8 — User fees for employee plans and exempt organizations. Current guidance for complying with the user fee program of the Service as it pertains to requests for l… IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2014
istrative scrutiny determination
Rev. Proc. 93–41
Adoption agreement
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22
Advisory letter
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22, 2014–6 Basic plan document
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22
Determination letter
Rev. Procs. 2014–6, 2014–9
Dual-purpose IRA
Rev. Procs. 98–59, 2010–48
Group exemption letter
Rev. …
Rev. Rul. 2014-24 — This revenue ruling modifies the list of group trust retiree benefit plans eligible to participate in 81–100 group trusts in accordance with the requirements o… IRCRevenue RulingsSep 8, 2014
…splaced by the disaster and modifies other requirements of § 142(d) to accommodate this suspension.
Rev. Proc. 2014–51 Rev. Proc. 2014–51 This revenue procedure provides guidance on certain aspects of an entity’s qualification as a real estate investment trust (REIT) in the context of transactions involving debt secure…
IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 1981related by meaning
…ority of the "otherwise provided” language of that Rule.
A11 section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, unless otherwise indicated.
Respondent’s reasoning for not sending a determination letter previously was that petitioner had no employees.
Sec. 7476 provides in pertinent part:
SEC. 7476…
Notice 2026-33 — This notice provides guidance with respect to section 334 of Division T of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Pub. L. 117-328, 136 Stat. 3559 (2022), k… IRCNoticesJun 8, 2026
term rate is set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 467.—Certain Payments for the Use of Property or Services The applicable federal short-term, mid-term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 468.—Special Rules f…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMay 8, 2015
. Rev. Rul. 77-85, 1977-1 C.B. 12, Rev. Rul. 80-274, 1980-2 C.B. 27,
Rev. Rul. 81-225, Rev. Rul. 82-54, 1982-1 C.B. 11, Rev. Rul. 2003-91, 2003-2 C.B. 347, and Rev. Rul. 2003-92, 2003-2 C.B. 350. The rulings stand for the proposition that
contract holders possessing control over the investment of the separate account a…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsAug 27, 1999
…al
or is not relevant to the issue presented in this
technical advice request.
5
The application of Rev. Rul. 54-608 was delayed by Rev. Rul. 55-246,
1955-1 C.B. 68; Rev. Rul. 56-315, 1956-2 C.B. 304; Rev. Rul. 57-28, 1957-1
C.B. 193; and Rev. Rul. 57-325, 1957-2 C.B. 302. Congress further delayed the
application of Re…