81 FR 20946 — Definition of the Term “Fiduciary”; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
…-1, Parts II-V; PTE 77-4; PTE 80-83; PTE 83-1: PTE 84-24; and PTE 86-128.
Back to Citation
54.
The revoked exemptions include PTE 75-1, Parts I(b) and (c); PTE 75-1, Part II(2); and parts of PTE 84-2 and PTE 86-128.
Back to Citation
55.
IRCCourt RulingsApr 12, 1976★ strong match
…f simplicity the partial termination of the plan is referred to as the termination of the plan.
See Rev. Rul. 58-94, 1958-1 C.B. 194; Rev. Rul. 58-95, 1958-1 C.B. 197; Rev. Rul. 58-96,1958-1 C.B. 200; Rev. Rul. 58-97,1958-1 C.B. 201; Rev. Rul. 58-98,1958-1 C.B. 202; Rev. Rul. 58-383,1958-2 C.B. 149; Rev. Rul. 65-147,19…
IRCCourt RulingsOct 2, 1974
…4.15 (plus interest not herein material) to Marine Midland Trust Co. of Rochester, N.Y., which had previously qualified as successor trustee of the B-G plan. This sum represented the entire amount accrued on the books of B-G which had not previously been actually paid under the plan.
The following is a transcript of de…
Rev. Proc. 2013-8 — User fees for employee plans and exempt organizations. Current guidance for complying with the user fee program of the Service as it pertains to requests for l… IRCRevenue ProceduresModified Jan 2, 2013
etermination Rev. Proc. 93-41
Adoption agreement Rev. Proc. 2011-49
Advisory letter Rev. Procs. 2011-49, 2013-6
Basic plan document Rev. Proc. 2011-49 Determination letter Rev. Procs. 2013-6, 2013-9
Dual-purpose IRA Rev. Procs. 98-59, 2010-48
Group exemption letter Rev. Proc. 80-27
Information letter Rev. Proc. 2013-4
…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsFeb 5, 1999
ions.
Various revenue rulings have considered the tax consequences of nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. Rev. Rul.
60-31, Situations 1-3 , 1960-1 C.B. 174, holds that a mere promise to pay, not represented by notes or secured in any way, does not
constitute receipt of income within the meaning of the cash…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMar 26, 1999
ion arrangements. Rev. Rul. 60-31, Situations 1-3
, 1960-1 C.B.
174, holds that a mere promise to pay, not represented by notes or secured in any way, does not constitute receipt of income within the meaning of the cash receipts and
disbursements method of accounting. See also, Rev. Rul. 69-650, 1969-2 C.B. 106,
and Re…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMar 12, 1999
…he taxpayer's control of its receipt is subject to
substantial limitations or restrictions.
Various revenue rulings have considered the tax consequences of nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. Rev. Rul.
60-31, Situations 1-3
, 1960-1 C.B. 174, holds that a mere promise to pay, not represented by notes or se…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJun 29, 2018related by meaning
…and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party, as specified in Rev. Proc. 2018-1, 2018-1 I.R.B. 1,
§ 7.01(16) (b). This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the
request for ruling, and such material is subject to verification on examination. The
Associ…
IRCCourt RulingsApr 25, 1972
…at the distribution of all funds of a pension trust to the employee participants, each of whom has previously executed and who thereafter carries out a legally enforceable agreement to pay over his distributive share to a new pension trust which, like the former, constitutes a qualified trust under section 401(a) of th…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsOct 21, 2016
… applies to
nonqualified plans of deferred compensation, including excess benefit plans, in various
revenue rulings. In Rev. Rul. 60-31, Situations 1 – 3, the Service held that a mere
promise to pay, not represented by notes or secured in any way, does not constitute
receipt of income by a cash basis taxpayer. Rev. Rul…
Rev. Rul. 2006-43 — Government pick-up plans; employer contributions; income tax; prospective application. This ruling describes the actions required for a state or its political … IRCRevenue RulingsAug 28, 2006
…contributions to meet the requirements set forth above in paragraph (1) of Law and Analysis in this revenue ruling. The relief provided above for “pick-ups” implemented prior to August 28, 2006, applies only if the actions taken otherwise complied with Rev. Rul. 81-35, Rev. Rul. 81-36, and Rev. Rul. 87-10, and only if …
Rev. Proc. 2014-8 — User fees for employee plans and exempt organizations. Current guidance for complying with the user fee program of the Service as it pertains to requests for l… IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2014
istrative scrutiny determination
Rev. Proc. 93–41
Adoption agreement
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22
Advisory letter
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22, 2014–6 Basic plan document
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22
Determination letter
Rev. Procs. 2014–6, 2014–9
Dual-purpose IRA
Rev. Procs. 98–59, 2010–48
Group exemption letter
Rev. …
Rev. Rul. 2014-24 — This revenue ruling modifies the list of group trust retiree benefit plans eligible to participate in 81–100 group trusts in accordance with the requirements o… IRCRevenue RulingsSep 8, 2014
…splaced by the disaster and modifies other requirements of § 142(d) to accommodate this suspension.
Rev. Proc. 2014–51 Rev. Proc. 2014–51 This revenue procedure provides guidance on certain aspects of an entity’s qualification as a real estate investment trust (REIT) in the context of transactions involving debt secure…
Notice 2026-33 — This notice provides guidance with respect to section 334 of Division T of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Pub. L. 117-328, 136 Stat. 3559 (2022), k… IRCNoticesJun 8, 2026
term rate is set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 467.—Certain Payments for the Use of Property or Services The applicable federal short-term, mid-term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 468.—Special Rules f…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJul 26, 2013related by meaning
…sues addressed in this ruling
have not yet been adopted. Therefore, this ruling will be modified or revoked by
adoption of temporary or final regulations to the extent the regulations are not
i nconsistent with any conclusion in the ruling. See § 11.04 Rev. Proc. 95-1, 1995-1
C.B. 9. However, when the criteria in § 11.…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMay 8, 2015
. Rev. Rul. 77-85, 1977-1 C.B. 12, Rev. Rul. 80-274, 1980-2 C.B. 27,
Rev. Rul. 81-225, Rev. Rul. 82-54, 1982-1 C.B. 11, Rev. Rul. 2003-91, 2003-2 C.B. 347, and Rev. Rul. 2003-92, 2003-2 C.B. 350. The rulings stand for the proposition that
contract holders possessing control over the investment of the separate account a…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsAug 27, 1999
…al
or is not relevant to the issue presented in this
technical advice request.
5
The application of Rev. Rul. 54-608 was delayed by Rev. Rul. 55-246,
1955-1 C.B. 68; Rev. Rul. 56-315, 1956-2 C.B. 304; Rev. Rul. 57-28, 1957-1
C.B. 193; and Rev. Rul. 57-325, 1957-2 C.B. 302. Congress further delayed the
application of Re…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsOct 13, 2006
…ge for such insurance is unreasonably large in
relation to the total charges under the contract.
In Rev. Rul. 75-302 , 1975-2 C.B. 86, Rev. Rul. 75-303, 1975-2 C.B. 87, and Rev. Rul. 76 -
481, 1976-2 C.B. 82, taxpayers were allowed a current deduction of payments for future medical
care extendi ng substantially beyond …
Rev. Rul. 2004-12 — Plan qualification; rollovers. This ruling describes a situation where an eligible retirement plan separately accounts for amounts attributable to rollover con… IRCRevenue RulingsFeb 17, 2004related by meaning
…es and between § 457 eligible governmental plans.
DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this revenue ruling is Roger Kuehnle of the Employee Plans, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. For further information regarding this revenue ruling, please contact Employee Plans’ taxpayer assistance telephone serv…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 11, 1980
and Effects,” 52 Minn. L. Rev. 1198 (1968); H. Dederick, “What Constitutes Discrimination in Pension and Profit-Sharing Plans?”, 22 J. Tax. 272(1965). An approach more favorable to petitioners would include in the computations Higgins’ Social Security (PICA) contributions. Liberty Machine Works, Inc. v. Commissioner, 6…