Rev. Rul. 2004-67 — Group or pooled trusts; participation; tax-exempt status, model language. This ruling provides that a governmental section 457(b) plan may invest in a second t… IRCRevenue RulingsJul 12, 2004related by meaning
…mination letter issued to it prior to July 12, 2004, regarding eligibility of its group trust under Rev. Rul. 81-100 will not lose its right to rely on its determination letter merely because it adopts Model Amendment 1 set forth above in this revenue ruling on a word-for-word basis (or adopts an amendment that is subs…
PLR 202524006 — Qualified Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Stock Bonus Plan IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJun 13, 2025
…“group t rust retiree benefit plans,” are qualified retirement plans under § 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code); governmental retiree benefit
plans under § 401(a)(24); certain custodial accounts under § 403(b)(7); retirement
income accounts under § 403(b)(9 ); IRAs that are exempt under § 408(e); eligible
gover…
Rev. Proc. 2013-5 — Technical advice. Revised procedures are provided for furnishing technical advice to area managers and appeals office by the Office of the Division Commissione… IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2013related by meaning
s not required if the Director, EO Examinations proposes to revoke or modify a letter recognizing tax-exempt status issued by the headquarters office. Regarding employee plans matters, a request for a TAM is required in cases concerning (1) proposed adverse or proposed revocation letters on collectively-bargained plans…
Rev. Proc. 2013-8 — User fees for employee plans and exempt organizations. Current guidance for complying with the user fee program of the Service as it pertains to requests for l… IRCRevenue ProceduresModified Jan 2, 2013
etermination Rev. Proc. 93-41
Adoption agreement Rev. Proc. 2011-49
Advisory letter Rev. Procs. 2011-49, 2013-6
Basic plan document Rev. Proc. 2011-49 Determination letter Rev. Procs. 2013-6, 2013-9
Dual-purpose IRA Rev. Procs. 98-59, 2010-48
Group exemption letter Rev. Proc. 80-27
Information letter Rev. Proc. 2013-4
…
IRCCourt RulingsSep 19, 1978related by meaning
…d part of our analysis, relating to the effect of unforeseen circumstances on respondent’s right to revoke his prior ruling. Respondent has publicly announced that a ruling will, in the absence of unusual circumstances, not be revoked retroactively. Statement of Procedural Rules, 26 C.F.R. sec. 601.201 (1977); Rev. Pro…
IRCCourt RulingsMay 23, 1979
…nitial fiscal year of the corporation was a short taxable period of 14 days commencing November 20, 1970, and ending December 3,1970. The reason for the adoption of the initial short taxable year was to obtain two pension plan contributions by petitioner’s corporation prior to the application of the 1969 Tax Reform Act…
73 T.C. 182 — Oakton Distributors, Inc. v. Commissioner IRCCourt RulingsOct 30, 1979related by meaning
… We sustain respondent's determination. Respondent is authorized to determine the extent to which a revocation of a determination letter will be applied without retroactive effect. Sec. 7805(b); sec. 301.7805-1(b), Proced. & Admin. Regs. 10 We must uphold the retroactive revocation in the instant case unless respondent…
Rev. Rul. 2006-43 — Government pick-up plans; employer contributions; income tax; prospective application. This ruling describes the actions required for a state or its political … IRCRevenue RulingsAug 28, 2006
…contributions to meet the requirements set forth above in paragraph (1) of Law and Analysis in this revenue ruling. The relief provided above for “pick-ups” implemented prior to August 28, 2006, applies only if the actions taken otherwise complied with Rev. Rul. 81-35, Rev. Rul. 81-36, and Rev. Rul. 87-10, and only if …
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJul 26, 2013related by meaning
…sues addressed in this ruling
have not yet been adopted. Therefore, this ruling will be modified or revoked by
adoption of temporary or final regulations to the extent the regulations are not
i nconsistent with any conclusion in the ruling. See § 11.04 Rev. Proc. 95-1, 1995-1
C.B. 9. However, when the criteria in § 11.…
Rev. Proc. 2014-8 — User fees for employee plans and exempt organizations. Current guidance for complying with the user fee program of the Service as it pertains to requests for l… IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2014
istrative scrutiny determination
Rev. Proc. 93–41
Adoption agreement
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22
Advisory letter
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22, 2014–6 Basic plan document
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22
Determination letter
Rev. Procs. 2014–6, 2014–9
Dual-purpose IRA
Rev. Procs. 98–59, 2010–48
Group exemption letter
Rev. …
IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 1981related by meaning
…ority of the "otherwise provided” language of that Rule.
A11 section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, unless otherwise indicated.
Respondent’s reasoning for not sending a determination letter previously was that petitioner had no employees.
Sec. 7476 provides in pertinent part:
SEC. 7476…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJul 19, 2002related by meaning
…orary or final regulations are inconsistent with any
conclusion in the ruling. See section 12.04 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1, 2001-1 I.R.B. 1, 46. However, when the criteria in section 12.05 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1 are satisfied, a ruling
is not revoked or modified retroactively except in rare or unusual circumstances.
Sincerely…
Notice 2026-33 — This notice provides guidance with respect to section 334 of Division T of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Pub. L. 117-328, 136 Stat. 3559 (2022), k… IRCNoticesJun 8, 2026
term rate is set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 467.—Certain Payments for the Use of Property or Services The applicable federal short-term, mid-term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 468.—Special Rules f…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMay 8, 2015
. Rev. Rul. 77-85, 1977-1 C.B. 12, Rev. Rul. 80-274, 1980-2 C.B. 27,
Rev. Rul. 81-225, Rev. Rul. 82-54, 1982-1 C.B. 11, Rev. Rul. 2003-91, 2003-2 C.B. 347, and Rev. Rul. 2003-92, 2003-2 C.B. 350. The rulings stand for the proposition that
contract holders possessing control over the investment of the separate account a…
IRCCourt RulingsFeb 12, 2003related by meaning
…)(6), Income Tax
Regs.
5
Howard E. Clendenen, Inc. v. Commissioner
, supra
.
Petitioners argue that Rev. Rul. 72-368, 1972-2 C.B. 220,
and Rev. Rul. 73-79, 1973-1 C.B. 194, support their contention
that disqualification in a prior year does not prevent the plan
from being qualified in a future year when it meets the
re…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsAug 27, 1999
…al
or is not relevant to the issue presented in this
technical advice request.
5
The application of Rev. Rul. 54-608 was delayed by Rev. Rul. 55-246,
1955-1 C.B. 68; Rev. Rul. 56-315, 1956-2 C.B. 304; Rev. Rul. 57-28, 1957-1
C.B. 193; and Rev. Rul. 57-325, 1957-2 C.B. 302. Congress further delayed the
application of Re…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsOct 13, 2006
…ge for such insurance is unreasonably large in
relation to the total charges under the contract.
In Rev. Rul. 75-302 , 1975-2 C.B. 86, Rev. Rul. 75-303, 1975-2 C.B. 87, and Rev. Rul. 76 -
481, 1976-2 C.B. 82, taxpayers were allowed a current deduction of payments for future medical
care extendi ng substantially beyond …
IRCCourt RulingsApr 12, 1976
…f simplicity the partial termination of the plan is referred to as the termination of the plan.
See Rev. Rul. 58-94, 1958-1 C.B. 194; Rev. Rul. 58-95, 1958-1 C.B. 197; Rev. Rul. 58-96,1958-1 C.B. 200; Rev. Rul. 58-97,1958-1 C.B. 201; Rev. Rul. 58-98,1958-1 C.B. 202; Rev. Rul. 58-383,1958-2 C.B. 149; Rev. Rul. 65-147,19…
Notice 2014-19 — The purpose of this notice is to provide guidance on the application (including the retroactive application) of the decision in United States v. Windsor, 570 U… IRCNoticesApr 21, 2014
…, must a qualified retirement plan be amended to reflect the outcome of Windsor and the guidance in Rev. Rul. 2013–17 and this notice?
A–4. Whether a plan must be amended to reflect the outcome of Windsor and the guidance in Rev. Rul. 2013–17 and this notice depends on the terms of the specific plan, as described in Q&…
Rev. Rul. 2008-13 — Performance-based compensation. This ruling holds that compensation paid to an executive is not qualified performance-based compensation for purposes of sectio… IRCRevenue RulingsMar 10, 2008
INCOME TAX
Rev. Rul. 2008-11 Rev. Rul. 2008-11
Federal rates; adjusted federal rates; adjusted federal long-term rate and the long-term exempt rate. For purposes of sections 382, 642, 1274, 1288, and other sections of the Code, tables set forth the rates for March 2008.
Rev. Rul. 2008-12 Rev. Rul. 2008-12
Application o…