IRCCourt RulingsOct 19, 1981
…s through contributions to both defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans subject to the rule of 1.4. Sec. 415(e).
IRCCourt RulingsJun 16, 1987
…130,000 from the trust. The note was payable on demand and was non-interest-bearing. On January 30, 1981, an article published in the Detroit Free Press stated that the shareholders of Cunningham had approved the sale to the New York investors on January 29, 1981, and that the shareholders would receive $18 per share b…
Rev. Proc. 2014-8 — User fees for employee plans and exempt organizations. Current guidance for complying with the user fee program of the Service as it pertains to requests for l… IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2014
istrative scrutiny determination
Rev. Proc. 93–41
Adoption agreement
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22
Advisory letter
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22, 2014–6 Basic plan document
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22
Determination letter
Rev. Procs. 2014–6, 2014–9
Dual-purpose IRA
Rev. Procs. 98–59, 2010–48
Group exemption letter
Rev. …
Rev. Rul. 2014-24 — This revenue ruling modifies the list of group trust retiree benefit plans eligible to participate in 81–100 group trusts in accordance with the requirements o… IRCRevenue RulingsSep 8, 2014
…splaced by the disaster and modifies other requirements of § 142(d) to accommodate this suspension.
Rev. Proc. 2014–51 Rev. Proc. 2014–51 This revenue procedure provides guidance on certain aspects of an entity’s qualification as a real estate investment trust (REIT) in the context of transactions involving debt secure…
Notice 2026-33 — This notice provides guidance with respect to section 334 of Division T of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Pub. L. 117-328, 136 Stat. 3559 (2022), k… IRCNoticesJun 8, 2026
term rate is set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 467.—Certain Payments for the Use of Property or Services The applicable federal short-term, mid-term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 468.—Special Rules f…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMay 8, 2015
. Rev. Rul. 77-85, 1977-1 C.B. 12, Rev. Rul. 80-274, 1980-2 C.B. 27,
Rev. Rul. 81-225, Rev. Rul. 82-54, 1982-1 C.B. 11, Rev. Rul. 2003-91, 2003-2 C.B. 347, and Rev. Rul. 2003-92, 2003-2 C.B. 350. The rulings stand for the proposition that
contract holders possessing control over the investment of the separate account a…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsAug 27, 1999
…al
or is not relevant to the issue presented in this
technical advice request.
5
The application of Rev. Rul. 54-608 was delayed by Rev. Rul. 55-246,
1955-1 C.B. 68; Rev. Rul. 56-315, 1956-2 C.B. 304; Rev. Rul. 57-28, 1957-1
C.B. 193; and Rev. Rul. 57-325, 1957-2 C.B. 302. Congress further delayed the
application of Re…
PLR 200202027 — Annuities Purchased by Section 501(c)(3) Organizations or Public Schools IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJan 11, 2002related by meaning
…orary or final regulations are inconsistent with any
conclusion in the ruling. See section 12.04 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1, 2001-1 I.R.B. 1, 46. However, when the criteria in section 12.05 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1 are satisfied, a ruling
is not revoked or modified retroactively except in rare or unusual circumstances.
Sincerely…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsOct 13, 2006
…ge for such insurance is unreasonably large in
relation to the total charges under the contract.
In Rev. Rul. 75-302 , 1975-2 C.B. 86, Rev. Rul. 75-303, 1975-2 C.B. 87, and Rev. Rul. 76 -
481, 1976-2 C.B. 82, taxpayers were allowed a current deduction of payments for future medical
care extendi ng substantially beyond …
IRCCourt RulingsApr 12, 1976
…f simplicity the partial termination of the plan is referred to as the termination of the plan.
See Rev. Rul. 58-94, 1958-1 C.B. 194; Rev. Rul. 58-95, 1958-1 C.B. 197; Rev. Rul. 58-96,1958-1 C.B. 200; Rev. Rul. 58-97,1958-1 C.B. 201; Rev. Rul. 58-98,1958-1 C.B. 202; Rev. Rul. 58-383,1958-2 C.B. 149; Rev. Rul. 65-147,19…
Rev. Rul. 2009-18 — Tax-sheltered annuity contracts. This ruling notes that a number of guidance documents had become outdated due to numerous intervening statutory revisions enac… IRCRevenue RulingsJul 6, 2009related by meaning
…bsoleted or superseded in their entirety, with one partial exception (Notice 89-23).
ADMINISTRATIVE
Rev. Proc. 2009-30 Rev. Proc. 2009-30 Electronic filing; 2009 form specifications. This procedure contains updates and changes to Publication 1220, Specifications for Filing Forms 1098, 1099, 3921, 3922, 5498, 8935, and …
Notice 2014-19 — The purpose of this notice is to provide guidance on the application (including the retroactive application) of the decision in United States v. Windsor, 570 U… IRCNoticesApr 21, 2014
…, must a qualified retirement plan be amended to reflect the outcome of Windsor and the guidance in Rev. Rul. 2013–17 and this notice?
A–4. Whether a plan must be amended to reflect the outcome of Windsor and the guidance in Rev. Rul. 2013–17 and this notice depends on the terms of the specific plan, as described in Q&…
Rev. Rul. 2008-13 — Performance-based compensation. This ruling holds that compensation paid to an executive is not qualified performance-based compensation for purposes of sectio… IRCRevenue RulingsMar 10, 2008
INCOME TAX
Rev. Rul. 2008-11 Rev. Rul. 2008-11
Federal rates; adjusted federal rates; adjusted federal long-term rate and the long-term exempt rate. For purposes of sections 382, 642, 1274, 1288, and other sections of the Code, tables set forth the rates for March 2008.
Rev. Rul. 2008-12 Rev. Rul. 2008-12
Application o…
Rev. Rul. 2004-12 — Plan qualification; rollovers. This ruling describes a situation where an eligible retirement plan separately accounts for amounts attributable to rollover con… IRCRevenue RulingsFeb 17, 2004related by meaning
…es and between § 457 eligible governmental plans.
DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this revenue ruling is Roger Kuehnle of the Employee Plans, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. For further information regarding this revenue ruling, please contact Employee Plans’ taxpayer assistance telephone serv…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJul 19, 2002related by meaning
…orary or final regulations are inconsistent with any
conclusion in the ruling. See section 12.04 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1, 2001-1 I.R.B. 1, 46. However, when the criteria in section 12.05 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1 are satisfied, a ruling
is not revoked or modified retroactively except in rare or unusual circumstances.
Sincerely…
Rev. Proc. 2015-36 — This revenue procedure modifies Rev. Proc. 2011–49 by expanding the scope of the pre-approved program to include defined benefit plans containing cash balance … IRCRevenue ProceduresJul 6, 2015
d Rev. Proc. 2015–22, 2015–11 I.R.B. 754).
.03 Areas Not Covered by Opinion Letters - Opinion letters will not be issued for:
(1) Multiemployer plans; (2) Union plans (this does not preclude a M&P plan from covering employees of the employer who are included in a unit covered by a collective bargaining agreement or the…
Rev. Rul. 2017-22 — This revenue ruling provides tables of covered compensation under § 401(l)(5)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code and the Income Tax Regulations thereunder, effect… IRCRevenue RulingsNov 27, 2017related by meaning
…yees under certain circumstances relating to the California Wildfires that began on October 8, 2017
Rev. Proc. 2017–59 Rev. Proc. 2017–59
This revenue procedure modifies Rev. Proc. 2015–13, 2015–5 I.R.B. 419, as clarified and modified by Rev. Proc. 2015–33, 2015–24 I.R.B. 1067, and as modified by Rev. Proc. 2016–1, 201…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsAug 17, 2018related by meaning
…d accompanied by a penalties of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party, as specified in Rev. Proc. 2018-1, 2018-1 I.R.B. 1,
§ 7.01(16)(b). This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the
request for ruling, and such material is subject to verification on examination. The
Associa…