IRCPrivate Letter RulingsOct 21, 2016
… applies to
nonqualified plans of deferred compensation, including excess benefit plans, in various
revenue rulings. In Rev. Rul. 60-31, Situations 1 – 3, the Service held that a mere
promise to pay, not represented by notes or secured in any way, does not constitute
receipt of income by a cash basis taxpayer. Rev. Rul…
83 FR 57536 — Religious Exemptions and Accommodations for Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act IRCFinal Rules (FR)Nov 15, 2018related by meaning
…the accommodation process to an optional process for exempt organizations and requiring a notice of revocation to be sent by the issuer or third party administrator to participants and beneficiaries in plans whose employer revokes their accommodation; these final rules confirm as final the Religious IFC provisions on t…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJul 19, 2002related by meaning
…orary or final regulations are inconsistent with any
conclusion in the ruling. See section 12.04 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1, 2001-1 I.R.B. 1, 46. However, when the criteria in section 12.05 of Rev. Proc. 2001-1 are satisfied, a ruling
is not revoked or modified retroactively except in rare or unusual circumstances.
Sincerely…
Rev. Rul. 2006-43 — Government pick-up plans; employer contributions; income tax; prospective application. This ruling describes the actions required for a state or its political … IRCRevenue RulingsAug 28, 2006
…contributions to meet the requirements set forth above in paragraph (1) of Law and Analysis in this revenue ruling. The relief provided above for “pick-ups” implemented prior to August 28, 2006, applies only if the actions taken otherwise complied with Rev. Rul. 81-35, Rev. Rul. 81-36, and Rev. Rul. 87-10, and only if …
Rev. Proc. 2014-8 — User fees for employee plans and exempt organizations. Current guidance for complying with the user fee program of the Service as it pertains to requests for l… IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2014
istrative scrutiny determination
Rev. Proc. 93–41
Adoption agreement
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22
Advisory letter
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22, 2014–6 Basic plan document
Rev. Procs. 2011–49, 2013–22
Determination letter
Rev. Procs. 2014–6, 2014–9
Dual-purpose IRA
Rev. Procs. 98–59, 2010–48
Group exemption letter
Rev. …
Rev. Rul. 2014-24 — This revenue ruling modifies the list of group trust retiree benefit plans eligible to participate in 81–100 group trusts in accordance with the requirements o… IRCRevenue RulingsSep 8, 2014
…splaced by the disaster and modifies other requirements of § 142(d) to accommodate this suspension.
Rev. Proc. 2014–51 Rev. Proc. 2014–51 This revenue procedure provides guidance on certain aspects of an entity’s qualification as a real estate investment trust (REIT) in the context of transactions involving debt secure…
Notice 2026-33 — This notice provides guidance with respect to section 334 of Division T of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Pub. L. 117-328, 136 Stat. 3559 (2022), k… IRCNoticesJun 8, 2026
term rate is set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 467.—Certain Payments for the Use of Property or Services The applicable federal short-term, mid-term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 468.—Special Rules f…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMay 8, 2015
. Rev. Rul. 77-85, 1977-1 C.B. 12, Rev. Rul. 80-274, 1980-2 C.B. 27,
Rev. Rul. 81-225, Rev. Rul. 82-54, 1982-1 C.B. 11, Rev. Rul. 2003-91, 2003-2 C.B. 347, and Rev. Rul. 2003-92, 2003-2 C.B. 350. The rulings stand for the proposition that
contract holders possessing control over the investment of the separate account a…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsAug 27, 1999
…al
or is not relevant to the issue presented in this
technical advice request.
5
The application of Rev. Rul. 54-608 was delayed by Rev. Rul. 55-246,
1955-1 C.B. 68; Rev. Rul. 56-315, 1956-2 C.B. 304; Rev. Rul. 57-28, 1957-1
C.B. 193; and Rev. Rul. 57-325, 1957-2 C.B. 302. Congress further delayed the
application of Re…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsOct 13, 2006
…ge for such insurance is unreasonably large in
relation to the total charges under the contract.
In Rev. Rul. 75-302 , 1975-2 C.B. 86, Rev. Rul. 75-303, 1975-2 C.B. 87, and Rev. Rul. 76 -
481, 1976-2 C.B. 82, taxpayers were allowed a current deduction of payments for future medical
care extendi ng substantially beyond …
IRCCourt RulingsApr 12, 1976
…f simplicity the partial termination of the plan is referred to as the termination of the plan.
See Rev. Rul. 58-94, 1958-1 C.B. 194; Rev. Rul. 58-95, 1958-1 C.B. 197; Rev. Rul. 58-96,1958-1 C.B. 200; Rev. Rul. 58-97,1958-1 C.B. 201; Rev. Rul. 58-98,1958-1 C.B. 202; Rev. Rul. 58-383,1958-2 C.B. 149; Rev. Rul. 65-147,19…
Rev. Rul. 2008-13 — Performance-based compensation. This ruling holds that compensation paid to an executive is not qualified performance-based compensation for purposes of sectio… IRCRevenue RulingsMar 10, 2008
INCOME TAX
Rev. Rul. 2008-11 Rev. Rul. 2008-11
Federal rates; adjusted federal rates; adjusted federal long-term rate and the long-term exempt rate. For purposes of sections 382, 642, 1274, 1288, and other sections of the Code, tables set forth the rates for March 2008.
Rev. Rul. 2008-12 Rev. Rul. 2008-12
Application o…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJan 19, 2001related by meaning
…orary or final regulations are inconsistent with any
conclusion in the ruling. See section 12.04 of Rev. Proc. 2000-1, 2000-1 I.R.B. 4, 46. However, when the criteria in section 12.05 of Rev. Proc. 2000-1 are satisfied, a ruling
is not revoked or modified retroactively except in rare or unusual circumstances.
Sincerely…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsAug 6, 1999related by meaning
oc. 99-1 are satisfied, a ruling is
not revoked or modified retroactively except in rare or unusual circumstances.
Sincerely yours,
ROBERT D. PATCHELL Assistant Chief, Branch 1
Office of the Associate
Chief Counsel
(Employee Benefits and
Exempt Organizations)
Enclosure:
Copy for section 6110 purposes
IRCCourt RulingsOct 3, 1995
…81.18, is unexplained in the record.
Similarly, the discrepancy between the amount of petitioner's
previously taxed contributions as reported on the Form 1099-R,
Rev. Rul. 2014-18 — This ruling provides that a nonstatutory stock option or a stock appreciation right (each, a stock right) granted by a nonqualified entity for purposes of sect… IRCRevenue RulingsJun 23, 2014related by meaning
…appraisers. These individuals are subject to the regulations governing practice before the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which are set out in Title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 10, and which are published in pamphlet form as Treasury Department Circular No. 230. The regulations prescribe the duties and restr…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsOct 5, 2012
…counting Principles, a synthetic lease is viewed as a secured loan by the IRS for tax purposes."
20
Rev. Rul. 77-85, 1977-1 C.B. 12; Rev. Rul. 80-274, 1980-2 C.B. 27; Rev. Rul. 81-225, 1981-2 C.B. 12; and Rev. Rul. 82-55, 1982-1 C.B. 12. See
also Rev. Proc. 99-44, 1999-2 C.B. 598.
21
Rev. Rul. 2003-91, 2003-2 C.B. 347,…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJun 5, 2020related by meaning
…and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by an appropriate party, as specified in Rev. Proc. 2020-1, 2020-1 I.R.B. 1,
PLR - 112964-19
5
section 7.01(16)(b). This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support
of the request for ruling, and such material is subject to verification on …
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsOct 8, 1999related by meaning
ly to the Plan submitted on February 26, 1999. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Temporary or final regulations pertaining to one or more of the issues addressed
in this ruling have not yet been adopted. Therefore, this ruling may be modified or
revo…
Rev. Proc. 2014-4 — Rulings and information letters; issuance procedures. Revised procedures are provided for furnishing ruling letters, information letters, etc., on matters rela… IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2014related by meaning
…7). These matters are generally handled by the Employee Plans Determinations program as provided in Rev. Proc. 2014–6, this Bulletin, Rev. Proc. 93–10 and Rev. Proc. 93–12. Although the Employee Plans Technical office will not ordinarily issue rulings on matters involving plan qualification, a ruling may be issued wher…