Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 11 U.S.C. § 704 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
72 documents · 0.20sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. T.C. Memo. 2016-33 — Sally M. Costello v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 1, 2016related by meaning
    tency), § T.C. Memo. 1998-145. That insight is applicable here where, besides failing to cite a single authority to support their premise, petitioners fail to show that any prohibited transaction took place. Although they do not specify which section 4975 prohibited transaction allegedly occurred, petitioners argue tha…
  2. 76 T.C. 1048 — Arkin v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 25, 1981
    …er’s distributive share of contributions and deductions. (1) For purposes of sections 702(a)(8) and 704 in the case of a defined contribution plan, a partner’s distributive share of contributions on behalf of self-employed individuals under such a plan is the contribution made on his behalf, and his distributive share …
  3. 162 T.C. No. 4 — Clair R. Couturier, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 28, 2024related by meaning
    004 made an excess contribution of $25,132,892 to his individual retirement account (IRA). Section 4973(a) 1 imposes an excise tax “in an amount equal to 6 percent of the amount of the excess contributions” that a taxpayer makes to an IRA in any given year. This tax continues to apply for future years, until such time …
  4. Treas. Reg. § 54.9816-8(h)(1) — Independent dispute resolution process.
    IRCRegulationsAug 28, 2026related by meaning
    (h)(1) (1) Any provision of this section held to be invalid or unenforceable by its terms, or as applied to any person or circumstance, will be construed so as to continue to give maximum effect to the provision permitted by law, unless such holding is one of utter invalidity or unenforceability, in which event the pro…
  5. 88 FR 75979 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023related by meaning
    y crime, however denominated by the laws of the relevant foreign or state government, that is substantially equivalent to an offense described in (A). For purposes of this section (a)(1), a person shall be deemed to have been convicted of a crime as of the “conviction date,” which is the date of the judgment of the tri…
  6. 82 FR 5373 — Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Annual Adjustments for 2017
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 18, 2017related by meaning
    portunities under Section 701(f)(3)(B)(i)(l)—each employee a separate violation 29 CFR 2575.2(h) 110 112. EBSA Employee Retirement Income Security Act Section 502(c)(9)(B)—Per day for each failure by a plan to timely provide to any State information required to be disclosed under Section 701(f)(3)(B)(ii), as added by C…
  7. Notice 2024-55 — Certain Exceptions to the 10 Percent Additional Tax Under Code Section 72(t)
    IRCNoticesJul 8, 2024related by meaning
    nal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by section 6103 of the Code. VI. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal authors of this notice are Naomi Lehr, Vernon Carter, and Pamela R. Kinard of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organization…
  8. 89 FR 43636 — Abandoned Plan Regulations
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)May 17, 2024
     One commenter argued that § 704(a)(11) does not make the chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee the plan administrator but rather requires it to “perform the obligation required of the administrator[.]” In this circumstance, the Department does not believe there is a meaningful distinction between the two. The Bankruptcy Abuse …
  9. 89 FR 3552 — Update to Minimum Present Value Requirements for Defined Benefit Plan Distributions
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jan 19, 2024
    …of this section ( Example 1), taking the probability of death only after age 65 into account, is 10.704. To satisfy the requirement of section 417(e)(3) and this paragraph (d), the single-sum distribution received by Q with respect to the employee-provided portion of the accrued benefit may not be less than $64,224 (th…
  10. PLR 201615013 — Special Antidiscrimination Rules
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsApr 8, 2016related by meaning
    Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service memorandum Number: 201615013 Release Date: 4/8/2016 CC:TEGE:EB PRESP - 126659-15 UILC: 410.02-01, 401.29-01 date : January 08, 2016 to : ------------------ ----------------------------------------- Area Counsel ( Tax Exempt & Government Entities Division Counsel) from : …
  11. T.C. Memo. 1998-336 — Robert A. & Laverne M. Hall v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 22, 1998related by meaning
    ights-related activity. And since none of petitioner's compensation for the year was includable in gross income, all of petitioner's IRA contributions for the year are nondeductible. Secs. 219(b), 408(o). Contributions are deemed to have been made to an IRA on the last day of the preceding taxable year if the contribut…
  12. 84 FR 67186 — Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans; Valuation of Benefits and Assets; Expected Retirement Age
    PBGCFinal Rules (FR)Dec 9, 2019
    …ly benefit at URA is greater than— From— To— 2021 672 672 2,839 2,839 2022 688 688 2,905 2,905 2023 704 704 2,971 2,971 2024 720 720 3,040 3,040 2025 736 736 3,110 3,110 2026 753 753 3,181 3,181 2027 771 771 3,254 3,254 2028 788 788 3,329 3,329 2029 806 806 3,406 3,406 2030 or later 825 825 3,484 3,484 1  Applicable ta…