Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 111 T.C. 105 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
69 documents · 0.21sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. U.S. Tax Court — Jeremiah Francis O'Neill v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 25, 2009
    …, contained no expres s y benefits . Therefore,' not excludable unde r section 104(a)(3) . Section .105 is the . mirror . image to section 104(a .) .-(3) buts provides two exceptions to iricludabilit . .-Section 105(b) provides an exclusion for amounts paid . by an employer to the taxpayer to reimburse the taxpayer for…
  2. DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges — USDOL v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SCHENECTADY LOCAL 105 ANNUITY FUND
    ERISACourt RulingsOct 31, 1997
    …MS Search Case Status DOL Home > OALJ > ERISA > USDOL v. Board of Trustees of the Schenectady Local 105 Annuity Fund, 95-RIS-40 (ALJ Oct. 31, 1997) USDOL/OALJ Reporter USDOL v. Board of Trustees of the Schenectady Local 105 Annuity Fund, 95-RIS-40 (ALJ Oct. 31, 1997) U.S. Department of Labor Office of Administrative La…
  3. FAB 2026-02 — Temporary Enforcement Policy Regarding Pension Benefit Statements Pursuant to ERISA § 105(a)(2)(E)
    ERISADOL Field Assistance BulletinsDec 31, 2025
    …ons Subj ect: Temporary Enforcement Policy Regarding Pension Benefit Statements Pursuant to ERISA § 105(a)(2)(E) Background Section 338(a) of the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (SECURE 2.0) amended section 105(a)(2) of ERISA by adding subparagraph ( E), which mandates the disclosure of certain pension benefit statements in pap…
  4. 59 T.C. 598; 59 T.C. No. 59 — Thriftimart, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 31, 1973related by meaning
    for any payment of any specific amount to any employee until the conditions of that employee having medical services or being away from work occurred. In Simplified Tax Records, Inc., 41 T.C. 75, 79 (1963), in disallowing a deduction to the taxpayer for a reserve for the estimated future cost of preparing subscribers’ …
  5. 95 T.C. 289; 95 T.C. No. 22 — Estate of Levitt v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 13, 1990related by meaning
    as to utilize the estate tax unified credit to its fullest extent. Kenneth G. Coveney, for the petitioner. William H. Quealy, Jr., for the respondent. Nims, Chief Judge. Korner, Hamblen, Cohen, Clapp, Swift, Wright, Parr, and Colvin, JJ., agree with the majority. Chabot, J., concurring *88 in the result. Hamblen and Wh…
  6. 89 FR 23338 — Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance and Independent, Noncoordinated Excepted Benefits Coverage
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Apr 3, 2024
    …income where the premiums or contributions were paid on a pre-tax basis is determined under section 105. Section 105(a) of the Code provides that such amounts are included in gross income except as otherwise provided in section 105 of the Code. Section 105(b) of the Code excludes such amounts from gross income amounts …
  7. T.C. Memo. 2010-226 — Harry Eugene Mathews v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 19, 2010related by meaning
    tter of local law and a State court's determination with regards to such assignment is not reviewable by this Court);9 Chambers v. Commissioner, supra 9This Court recognizes that in Commissioner v. Estate of Bosch, 387 U.S. 456, 465 (1967), the Court held that where the Federal estate tax liability turns upon the chara…
  8. T.C. Summary Opinion 2005-78 — Hossam Helmy El-Bibany & Salma Hassan Kandil v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 8, 2005related by meaning
    respondent from changing respondent’s position to correct a mistake of law unless - 15 - petitioners would suffer an unconscionable injury because of their reliance on respondent’s concession at trial. Although petitioners did not file a brief in response, the record in its entirety fails to demonstrate that petitioner…
  9. 112 T.C. No. 6 — Gideon L. & Corazon P. Medina v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 22, 1999related by meaning
    112 T.C. No. 6 UNITED STATES TAX COURT GIDEON L. MEDINA AND CORAZON P. MEDINA, Petitioners v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 18999-97. Filed February 22, 1999. H and W, who were both disqualified persons within the meaning of sec. 4975, I.R.C., borrowed $340,000 from the qualified pension plan…