Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to I.R.C. § 261 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
80 documents · 0.26sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 29 C.F.R. § 4000.41 — What are these computation-of-time rules about?
    PBGCRegulationsJan 22, 2018
    …r than in the PBGC's own regulations (e.g., requirements under the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, USC)). In meeting those requirements, you should follow any applicable computation-of-time rules under those other requirements. (Subpart A tells you what filing methods you may use for filings with us. Subpart B tells y…
  2. T.C. Memo. 2011-105 — Mark E. Warmoth v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 19, 2011related by meaning
    ion 6662(a) and (b) (2). Generally, section 6662(a) and (b) (1) authorizes the Commissioner to impose a 20-percent penalty on the portion of an - 72 - underpayment of income tax attributable to negligence or disregard of rules or regulations. The term "negligence" includes any failure to make.a reasonable attempt to co…
  3. 91 FR 9213 — Requirement To Provide Paper Statements in Certain Cases-Amendments to Electronic Disclosure Safe Harbors
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Feb 25, 2026
    … a result, DB Beneficiaries will not be included in calculations discussing “beneficiaries”. See 29 USC 1025 for more information. 3  Bureau of Labor Statistics, Job Opening and Labor Turnover. Table A, Total Private. February 2025. Most recent release can be found here: https://www.bls.gov/​news.release/​pdf/​jolts.pd…
  4. T.C. Memo. 2007-327 — Gregory Eugene Thompson v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 31, 2007related by meaning
    ner's legal obligations here . See, e .g ., Pessin v . Commissioner , 59 T .C . 473, 489 (1972) ; Rosanova v . Commissioner , T .C . Memo . 1985-306 ; Grant v . Commissioner , T .C . Memo . 1980-242 . -11IV . Section 6673 Penalt y We now consider whether petitioner should be held liable for a penalty under section 6673…
  5. 125 T.C. No. 5 — 100 Oak Street Corporation v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 15, 2005related by meaning
    tinued...) - 5 - of the Secretary, and in the same manner as taxes. Sec. 6652(c) (4) (A). Section 6331(a) provides that, if a person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to do so within 10 days after notice and demand, the Secretary can collect the tax by levy upon the property belonging to the person, subject to …
  6. T.C. Memo. 2011-58 — Erin N. Hellweg v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 9, 2011related by meaning
    ds of thousands of dollars in DISC commissions each year from a well-established business, and a 25-percent share in a company receiving such a steady stream of income should have been worth a large amount. -28IV. Section 6662(a) Penalty Section 6662(a) and (b) (1) and (2) imposes an accuracyrelated penalty of 20 perce…
  7. T.C. Memo. 2017-5 — Brian E. Harriss v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 5, 2017related by meaning
    ably with the Code, but also negligence and a clear disregard of rules or regulations. Petitioner did not act with reasonable cause and in good faith. Accordingly, the Court holds that petitioner is liable for accuracy-related penalties under section 6662(a) for the 2010 and 2011 tax years. - 15 - [*15] VII. Section 66…
  8. T.C. Memo. 2018-138 — Larry W. Macdonald v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 27, 2018related by meaning
    0 and $5,379, respectively; and (4) liable for an accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) for 2013 and 2014 of $3,267 and $7,364, respectively. The examining agent's immediate supervisor approved the section 6662(a) penalties in writing by making an entry in the Correspondence Examination Automation Case Support…
  9. PLR 201017056 — Tax on Prohibited Transactions
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsApr 30, 2010
    … April 01, 2010 2:59:47 PM To: ------------------ Cc: Subject: RE: ERISA question The pr ovision 29 USC 1104(b) that you are referring to is section 404(b) of ERISA, that provides that no fiduciary may maintain the indicia of ownership of any assets of a plan outside the jurisdiction of the District Courts of the U.S.,…
  10. 78 FR 68240 — Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008; Technical Amendment to External Review for Multi-…
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Nov 13, 2013
    …ursuant to the authority contained in sections 2701 through 2763, 2791, and 2792 of the PHS Act (42 USC 300gg through 300gg-63, 300gg-91, and 300gg-92), as amended. List of Subjects 26 CFR Part 54 Excise taxes Health care Health insurance Pensions Reporting and recordkeeping requirements 29 CFR Part 2590 Continuation c…
  11. PBGC Op. Ltr. 1994-8 — Withdrawal liability
    PBGCPBGC Opinion LettersSep 30, 1994
    …( 4)( B)> 421 9 N otice & Co llection o f W ithdraw al Liab ility 422 1 Reso lution of Disputes >29 USC 1461 n ote > OP INI ON : I wri te i n res ponse t o your reque st for the opini on of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBG C"). Your fir st r equest c oncerns a par ticu lar applicat ion of t he princ iples…
  12. T.C. Memo. 2012-168 — Steven W. & Gayle F. Repetto v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 14, 2012related by meaning
    ause, petitioners must show that the assessment of the penalties is so harsh and oppressive as to transgress the constitutional limitation: See, e.g., McGehee Family Clinic v. Commissioner, T.C.:Memo. 2010-202. The penalty structure of section 6662A does not do so Petitioners also contend that their due process rights …
  13. 75 FR 43330 — Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Internal Claims and Appeals and External Review Processes Under the Patient…
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jul 23, 2010
    …ing Department of Labor claims procedure regulation. That is, the Department of Labor interprets 29 USC 1133 and the DOL claims procedure regulation as already requiring that plans provide claimants with new or additional evidence or rationales upon request and an opportunity to respond in certain circumstances. See Br…
  14. 75 FR 37188 — Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits, Rescissions, and Patient Protections
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jun 28, 2010
    … read as follows: Authority: 2701 through 2763, 2791, and 2792 of the Public Health Service Act (42 USC 300gg through 300gg-63, 300gg-91, and 300gg-92), as amended. 5. Add § 147.108 to read as follows: § 147.108 Prohibition of preexisting condition exclusions. (a) No preexisting condition exclusions —(1) In general. A …
  15. 29 C.F.R. § 2560.502c-6(e) — Civil penalties under section 502(c)(6).
    ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
    (e) (e) Showing of reasonable cause. Upon issuance by the Department of a notice of intent to assess a penalty, the administrator shall have thirty (30) days from the date of service of the notice, as described in paragraph (i) of this section, to file a statement of reasonable cause explaining why the penalty, as calc…
  16. 91 FR 33900 — Federal Independent Dispute Resolution Operations
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jun 4, 2026
    …the No Surprises Act. U.S.C.-Brookings Schaeffer on Health Policy. https://www.brookings.edu/​blog/​usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/​2021/​03/​16/​recommendations-for-implementing-the-no-surprises-act/​. Back to Citation 340.   See, for example, the proposed 2027 HHS notice of benefit and payment parameters (9…
  17. T.C. Memo. 2020-152 — Brett John Ball v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 10, 2020related by meaning
    payer had "substantial authority" or, in the case of items adequately disclosed, a "reasonable basis". Sec. 6662(d)(2)(B). Section 6664(c)(1) provides an exception to the imposition of the section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty if it is shown that there was reasonable cause for the underpayment and the taxpayer acted…
  18. 24 T.C. 460 — Northwest Automatic Products Corp. v. United States
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 23, 1955related by meaning
    a determination of whether we had jurisdiction or not once it should be held that the method prescribed by statute is not the exclusive method. * * * See also, Henry Wilson, 16 B. T. A. 1280 (1929); William M. Greve, 37 B. T. A. 450 (1938); John A. Gebelein, Inc., 37 B. T. A. 605 (1938); Oscar Block, 2 T. C. 761 (1943…
  19. T.C. Memo. 2019-1 — Robert Wesley v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 14, 2019related by meaning
    mmissioner, 126 T.C. 237, 257-258 (2006), rev'd on other grounds, 514 F.3d 1119 (10th Cir. 2008); Hull v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2015-86, 109 T.C.M. (CCH) 1438, 1441. - 20 - [*20] D. Frivolous Position Penalty Section 6673(a)(1) authorizes this Court to impose a penalty not in excess of $25,000 "[w]henever it appears…
  20. 63 T.C. 11 — Gillis v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 2, 1974related by meaning
    may draw upon it at any time, or so that he could have drawn upon it during the taxable year if notice of intention to withdraw had been given. * * * The cases arising under sec. 267, cited by petitioners, include Fetzer Refrigerator Co. v. United States, 437 F.2d 577 (C.A. 6, 1971); Hyplains Dressed Beef, Inc., 56 T.…