75 FR 43330 — Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Internal Claims and Appeals and External Review Processes Under the Patient… IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jul 23, 2010
…ing Department of Labor claims procedure regulation. That is, the Department of Labor interprets 29 USC 1133 and the DOL claims procedure regulation as already requiring that plans provide claimants with new or additional evidence or rationales upon request and an opportunity to respond in certain circumstances.
See
Br…
PLR 201432029 — Excise Tax on Certain Accumulations in Qualified Retirement Plans IRCPrivate Letter RulingsAug 8, 2014related by meaning
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
MAY 13 2014
Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00, 2501.00-00, 4973.00-00, 4974.00-00
* * *
* * *
* * *
Legend:
Taxpayer A
=
* * *
Decedent 8
=
* * *
Decedent c
=
* * *
Charity D
=
* * *
Trust
=
* * *
Financia…
75 FR 37188 — Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits, Rescissions, and Patient Protections IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jun 28, 2010
… read as follows:
Authority:
2701 through 2763, 2791, and 2792 of the Public Health Service Act (42 USC 300gg through 300gg-63, 300gg-91, and 300gg-92), as amended.
5. Add § 147.108 to read as follows:
§ 147.108
Prohibition of preexisting condition exclusions.
(a)
No preexisting condition exclusions
—(1)
In general.
A …
91 FR 33900 — Federal Independent Dispute Resolution Operations IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jun 4, 2026
…the No Surprises Act.
U.S.C.-Brookings Schaeffer on Health Policy.
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/2021/03/16/recommendations-for-implementing-the-no-surprises-act/.
Back to Citation
340.
See,
for example, the proposed 2027 HHS notice of benefit and payment parameters (9…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 1, 2012related by meaning
yer's return information. None of the assertions, even if true,
would affect petitioners' deficiency. Petitioners' attacks on the Court in relation to its Rules of Practice and Procedure and the rulings in this and other cases lack
merit and will not be addressed in this opinion. Adverse rulings are not grounds
- 8 -
[…
IRCCourt RulingsSep 10, 2015related by meaning
le petitioner may not agree with the way the law is written and may
have reasons that he believes support changing the law, we cannot do that for him. Tax policy is within Congress' purview, not within this Court's. We decide cases
on the basis of the law enacted by Congress rather than a taxpayer's policy
arguments as…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 23, 2025related by meaning
one fluent in English knows that the word ‘includes’ cannot be assumed
to mean ‘includes only .’ . . .”) ; Waltne r , 107 T.C.M. (CCH) at 1201 (citing United States v. Lat ham , 754 F.2d 747, 750 (7th Cir. 1985) ) .
In sum, petitioner’s arguments have been rejected by the courts
in hundreds of cases, and we will not di…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 5, 2017related by meaning
n 6662(a) and (b)(1) and (2), a taxpayer may be liable for a penalty of20%
5 Over petitioner's objection respondent introduced a literal transcript of account for petitioner's 2010 tax year. The literal transcript contains no reference
to any SFRs. Even if it did, the literal transcript does not establish that the
requ…
IRCCourt RulingsMar 7, 2000related by meaning
rental income, and IRA
distributions are included in gross income and subject to Federal
income tax. Secs. 1, 61(a)(4), 61(a)(5), 61(a)(9), 61(a)(11), 408(d). Petitioner's income from wages, interest, rent, and IRA
distributions is taxable. We sustain respondent's determinations
on these issues.
We next consider whethe…
IRCCourt RulingsNov 7, 1996related by meaning
case.
E. Legislative Intent
Petitioner also argues that Congress did not intend for the
excise tax under section 4980A to apply to amounts distributed under a qualified employer plan to an individual who is not
retired. Here, however, we are reminded of the admonition of the
Supreme Court that "There is * * * no more p…
167 T.C. No. 4 — Piton Holdings, LLC, David L. Hall, Partnership Representative, Petitioner(s) v. Commissioner IRCCourt RulingsJul 15, 2026related by meaning
e rules regarding other penalties listed in section 6662(b).
See § 6662(c), (e)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1), (j)(1), (k) (each beginning with the phrase “[f]or purposes of this section” and explaining the meaning of terms such as “negligence,”
“substantial valuation misstatement,” and so on).
11
Section 6664(c) is titled “ Reas…
76 FR 52259 — Interest and Penalty Suspension Provisions Under Section 6404(g) of the Internal Revenue Code IRCFinal Rules (FR)Aug 22, 2011related by meaning
use these regulations do not impose a collection of information on small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, the notice of proposed rulemaking preceding these regulations was submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Busin…