ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
For 502(c)(8) civil penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.10 of this title.
ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
(k) (k) Cross-reference. See §§ 2570.160 through 2570.171 of this chapter for procedural rules relating to administrative hearings under section 502(c)(8) of the Act.
IRCCourt RulingsMar 22, 2007related by meaning
ddition to tax must be
sustained.
Section 6673(a)(1) authorizes the Court to require a
taxpayer to pay the United States a penalty in an amount not to exceed $25,000 whenever the taxpayer’s position is frivolous or
groundless or the taxpayer has instituted or pursued the
proceeding primarily for delay. Respondent has n…
IRCCourt RulingsDec 30, 2013related by meaning
the amount of tax imposed that is shown on the return, reduced by any
rebate. Sec. 6662(d)(2)(A). The amount of the understatement is reduced by that portion of the understatement that is attributable to (1) the tax treatment of any
item if there is or was substantial authority for such treatment, or (2) any item if
t…
IRCCourt RulingsFeb 9, 1998related by meaning
this case of most of the
enumerated badges of fraud. Accordingly, petitioner is liable
for section 6651(f) additions to tax for 1990, 1991, and 1992. Section 6654(a) imposes an addition to tax for failure to
make timely estimated income tax payments. Where prepayments of
tax do not equal the percentage of total liabil…
ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
For prohibited transaction penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of § 18.10 of this title.
88 FR 75744 — Federal Independent Dispute Resolution Operations IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023
…the No Surprises Act.
U.S.C.-Brookings Schaeffer on Health Policy.
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/2021/03/16/recommendations-for-implementing-the-no-surprises-act/.
Back to Citation
262.
See
Federal Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) Process Administrative Fee and Cert…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 8, 1980related by meaning
minations should also be within our jurisdiction. Regardless of the logic of petitioners’ position, we are constrained to deny their motion to vacate. The United States Tax Court has limited jurisdiction. See sec. 7442. Under this jurisdictional umbrella fall generally income, estate, gift, and miscellaneous excise tax…
IRCFinal Rules (FR)Aug 26, 2022
…s Act.” U.S.C.-Brookings Schaeffer on Health Policy. (March 2021).
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/2021/03/16/recommendations-for-implementing-the-no-surprises-act/.
Back to Citation
114.
2 U.S.C. 1501
et seq.
(1995).
Back to Citation
115.
See House Conf. Rep. No. 104-73…
167 T.C. No. 4 — Piton Holdings, LLC, David L. Hall, Partnership Representative, Petitioner(s) v. Commissioner IRCCourt RulingsJul 15, 2026related by meaning
e rules regarding other penalties listed in section 6662(b).
See § 6662(c), (e)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1), (j)(1), (k) (each beginning with the phrase “[f]or purposes of this section” and explaining the meaning of terms such as “negligence,”
“substantial valuation misstatement,” and so on).
11
Section 6664(c) is titled “ Reas…
IRCCourt RulingsDec 22, 2008related by meaning
foregoing quoted terms are specially defined and used
under the "Public Salary Tax Act of 1939" ;
3 . petitioner was not a "person," nor "individual," nor "U .S . person," nor "U .S . individual," nor
"taxpayer," nor "non-resident alien," nor any other
"legal entity" "made liable for" or "subject to" any
"internal reve…