Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to I.R.C. § 635 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
73 documents · 0.22sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 122 T.C. No. 16 — Gregory Iannone v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 19, 2004related by meaning
    the payment of such tax. * * * Section 6334(a) exempts from levy: (1) Wearing apparel and school books; (2) fuel, provisions, furniture, and personal effects; (3) books and tools of a trade, business, or profession; (4) unemployment benefits; (5) undelivered mail; (6) certain annuity and pension payments; (7) workmen’…
  2. Rev. Proc. 2014-32 — This revenue procedure establishes a pilot program providing administrative relief to plan administrators and plan sponsors of certain retirement plans from th…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJun 2, 2014related by meaning
    edure should be mailed to: Internal Revenue Service Employee Plans Delinquent Filer Program EP Classification 9350 Flair Drive El Monte, CA 91731-2828 .05. Private delivery services. Certain private delivery services designated by the Service can be used to meet the rule that timely mailing is treated as timely filing/…
  3. 82 T.C. 843; 82 T.C. No. 65 — Green v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 30, 1984related by meaning
    ents of section 2039(c)(3). Due to concessions and in order to reflect petitioner’s claim for an overpayment, Decision will be entered under Rule 155. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as amended and in effect at the date of death, and all references to Rules ar…
  4. T.C. Memo. 2019-67 — Maria Shenorah McCree v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 6, 2019related by meaning
    - *19. The Court did not make a determination regarding whether SO Taylor abused his discretion when he sustained the proposed levy. Because the Court determined that petitioner's underlying liability should be reviewed de novo at a future trial setting, the Court stated that a review of SO Taylor's administrative dete…
  5. T.C. Memo. 1996-265 — Harold E. & Anna Mae Emmons v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 11, 1996related by meaning
    1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of T.C. Memo. 1996-265 UNITED STATES TAX COURT HAROLD E. EMMONS AND ANNA MAE EMMONS, Petitioners v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respond…
  6. 88 FR 75744 — Federal Independent Dispute Resolution Operations
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023
    …the No Surprises Act. U.S.C.-Brookings Schaeffer on Health Policy. https://www.brookings.edu/​blog/​usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/​2021/​03/​16/​recommendations-for-implementing-the-no-surprises-act/​. Back to Citation 262.  See Federal Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) Process Administrative Fee and Cert…
  7. T.C. Memo. 2012-168 — Steven W. & Gayle F. Repetto v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 14, 2012related by meaning
    atement for any taxable year, there shall be added to the tax an amount equal to 20% of the amount of such understatement." The penalty applies to any deficiency which is attributable to any listed transaction or any reportable transaction if a significant purpose of the transaction is the avoidance or evasion - 41 - o…
  8. 89 FR 37706 — Clean Vehicle Credits Under Sections 25E and 30D; Transfer of Credits; Critical Minerals and Battery Components; Foreign Entities of Concern
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)May 6, 2024related by meaning
    ns clarify that failing to file a return or failing to attach Form 8936 to a return will not alone subject the taxpayer to the credit recapture rules. Proposed §§ 1.25E-3(h) and 1.30D-5(g) provide a reporting requirement for taxpayers who transfer a section 25E credit or section 30D credit to a dealer, but do not provi…
  9. 87 FR 52618 — Requirements Related to Surprise Billing
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Aug 26, 2022
    …s Act.” U.S.C.-Brookings Schaeffer on Health Policy. (March 2021). https://www.brookings.edu/​blog/​usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/​2021/​03/​16/​recommendations-for-implementing-the-no-surprises-act/​. Back to Citation 114.  2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq. (1995). Back to Citation 115.  See House Conf. Rep. No. 104-73…
  10. 88 FR 76032 — Proposed Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 75-1, 77-4, 80-83, 83-1, and 86-128
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023related by meaning
    rm × 5.8 percent paper) + (11,000 Annual Statement × 5.8 percent paper) + (11,000 Report of Commissions Paid × 5.8 percent paper) = 1,943 disclosures. Back to Citation 52.  5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. Back to Citation 53.  5 U.S.C. 601(2), 603(a); see also 5 U.S.C. 551. Back to Citation 54.  Public Law 104-4, 109 Stat. 48 (Ma…
  11. 75 FR 33992 — Interest and Penalty Suspension Provisions Under Section 6404(g) of the Internal Revenue Code
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jun 16, 2010related by meaning
    contact the taxpayer. (a) [Reserved]. (b)(1) through (4) [Reserved]. (5) Listed transactions and undisclosed reportable transactions —(i) In general. The general rule of suspension under section 6404(g)(1) does not apply to any interest, penalty, addition to tax, or additional amount with respect to any listed transac…
  12. Treas. Reg. § 54.6695-1(a) — Other assessable penalties with respect to the preparation of tax returns for other persons.
    IRCRegulationsDec 30, 2016related by meaning
    (a) (a) In general. A person who is a tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of tax under chapter 43 of subtitle D of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) shall be subject to penalties for failure to furnish a copy to the taxpayer under section 6695(a) of the Code, failure to sign the return under section 66…
  13. 151 T.C. No. 9 — David H. Melasky & Audrey Melasky v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 10, 2018related by meaning
    x under section 6651, 6654, or 6655, and there's no indication that it's automatically calculated through electronic means--but there's no evidence in the administrative record that the SO verified that the Commissioner complied with section 6751(b)(1) when he assessed the bad-check penalty against the Melaskys. CL Bla…