Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to I.R.C. § 801 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
73 documents · 0.19sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 86 FR 708 — Regulatory Capital Treatment for Investments in Certain Unsecured Debt Instruments of Global Systemically Important U.S. Bank Holding Companies, Certain Interm…
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Jan 6, 2021
    …tation 67.  12 U.S.C. 4802(a). Back to Citation 68.  12 U.S.C. 4802. Back to Citation 69.  5 U.S.C. 801 et seq. Back to Citation 70.  5 U.S.C. 801(a)(3). Back to Citation 71.  5 U.S.C. 804(2). Back to Citation 23.  The national bank or Federal savings association must calculate amounts deducted under paragraphs (c) thr…
  2. 141 T.C. No. 19 — Andrew Wayne Roberts v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 30, 2013related by meaning
    . - 26 - return or in a statement attached to the return and there is a reasonable basis for the taxpayer's treatment of the item. Sec. 6662(d)(2)(B). The Commissioner bears the initial burden of production with respect to the taxpayer's liability for the section 6662 penalty. Sec. 7491(c). At trial the Commissioner mu…
  3. I.R.C. § 6652(l) — Failure to file certain information returns, registration statements, etc.
    IRCCode / StatuteJan 24, 2020related by meaning
    (l) (l) Failure to file return with respect to certain corporate transactions In the case of any failure to make a return required under section 6043(c) containing the information required by such section on the date prescribed therefor (determined with regard to any extension of time for filing), unless it is shown th…
  4. T.C. Memo. 2019-1 — Robert Wesley v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 14, 2019related by meaning
    appears on dozens of other documents in the record. In any event petitioner offered no plausible explanation about where the money went if not to him. 4We do not believe that respondent was obligated to concede the inapplicability of the section 72(t) additional tax or the nontaxability of $737 in miscellaneous income.…
  5. 76 FR 74699 — Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans; Valuation of Benefits and Assets; Expected Retirement Age
    PBGCFinal Rules (FR)Dec 1, 2011
    …577 2,577 2017 623 623 2,632 2,632 2018 636 636 2,687 2,687 2019 649 649 2,743 2,743 2020 663 663 2,801 2,801 2021 677 677 2,860 2,860 2022 or later 691 691 2,920 2,920 1 Table II-A. 2 Table II-B. 3 Table II-C. * * * * * Issued in Washington, DC, this 18th day of November 2011. Laricke Blanchard, Deputy Director for Po…
  6. T.C. Memo. 2007-68 — Christina L. Belmont v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 22, 2007related by meaning
    ddition to tax must be sustained. Section 6673(a)(1) authorizes the Court to require a taxpayer to pay the United States a penalty in an amount not to exceed $25,000 whenever the taxpayer’s position is frivolous or groundless or the taxpayer has instituted or pursued the proceeding primarily for delay. Respondent has n…
  7. 84 FR 25209 — Withholding on Certain Distributions Under Section 3405(a) and (b)
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed May 31, 2019related by meaning
    Pensions Railroad retirement Reporting and recordkeeping requirements Social security Unemployment compensation Proposed Amendments to the Regulations Accordingly, 26 CFR part 31 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 31—EMPLOYMENT TAXES AND COLLECTION OF INCOME AT THE SOURCE Paragraph 1. The authority citation for…
  8. T.D. 9130 — Final regulations concern required minimum distributions under section 401(a)(9) of the Code for defined benefit plans and annuity contracts providing benefits…
    IRCTreasury DecisionsJun 28, 2004
    …re paid at a rate of $250,000 per year and after D retires the lump sum payment at age 75 is $2,499,801. Thus, after taking into account the modification, the annuity stream determined as of the original annuity starting date consists of annual payments beginning at age 70 of $250,000, $250,000, $250,000, $250,000, and…
  9. T.C. Memo. 2008-17 — Herbert & Christine Bangs v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 31, 2008related by meaning
    er sec . 6662(a) . A - 23 - To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for p etitioners in l ocket No . 4467-06 . Decision w 11 be entered for respondent as t the deficiency and for petitioners as to the accuracyrelated penalty under sectio n 6662(a) in docket No . 7221-06 .
  10. 29 C.F.R. § 4000.21 — What are these rules for determining the filing or issuance date about?
    PBGCRegulationsJan 1, 2017
    …r than in the PBGC's own regulations (e.g., requirements under the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, USC)). In meeting those requirements, you should follow any applicable rules under those requirements for determining the filing and issuance date. (Subpart A tells you what filing methods you may use for filings with us…
  11. 29 C.F.R. § 4000.26(b) — What if I use a commercial delivery service?
    PBGCRegulationsJan 1, 2017
    …t use a “designated delivery service” under section 7502(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, USC). Our Web site, http://www.pbgc.gov, lists those designated delivery services. You should make sure that both the provider and the particular type of delivery (such as two-day delivery) are designated.
  12. 29 C.F.R. § 4000.41 — What are these computation-of-time rules about?
    PBGCRegulationsJan 22, 2018
    …r than in the PBGC's own regulations (e.g., requirements under the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, USC)). In meeting those requirements, you should follow any applicable computation-of-time rules under those other requirements. (Subpart A tells you what filing methods you may use for filings with us. Subpart B tells y…
  13. ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
    [Reserved]