Search the Pension Law Library

61. 29 C.F.R. § 2570.2 — Definitions.
    ERISARegulationsJan 1, 2017related by meaning
    For prohibited transaction penalty proceedings, this section shall apply in lieu of the definitions in § 18.2 of this title:
62. 88 FR 75744 — Federal Independent Dispute Resolution Operations
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023
    …the No Surprises Act. U.S.C.-Brookings Schaeffer on Health Policy. https://www.brookings.edu/​blog/​usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/​2021/​03/​16/​recommendations-for-implementing-the-no-surprises-act/​. Back to Citation 262.  See Federal Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) Process Administrative Fee and Cert…
63. ERISA § 502(c)(10)(E) (29 U.S.C. § 1132) — Civil enforcement
    ERISACode / StatuteJan 6, 2025related by meaning
    (c)(10)(E) (E) Waiver by secretary .—In the case of a failure which is due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, the Secretary may waive part or all of the penalty imposed by subparagraph (A) to the extent that the payment of such penalty would be excessive relative to the failure involved. (c)(10)(F) (F) Def…
64. 87 FR 52618 — Requirements Related to Surprise Billing
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Aug 26, 2022
    …s Act.” U.S.C.-Brookings Schaeffer on Health Policy. (March 2021). https://www.brookings.edu/​blog/​usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/​2021/​03/​16/​recommendations-for-implementing-the-no-surprises-act/​. Back to Citation 114.  2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq. (1995). Back to Citation 115.  See House Conf. Rep. No. 104-73…
65. 29 C.F.R. § 4262.17(g) — Other provisions.
    PBGCRegulationsAug 8, 2022related by meaning
    (g) (g) If any provision in this part is held to be invalid or unenforceable by its terms, or as applied to any person or circumstance, or stayed pending further agency action, the provision will be construed so as to continue to give the maximum effect to the provision permitted by law, unless such holding will be one…
66. Circular 230 § 10.50(c) — Sanctions.
    Joint BoardRegulationsOct 11, 2017related by meaning
    (c) (c) Authority to impose monetary penalty (c)(1) (1) In general. (c)(1)(i) (i) The Secretary of the Treasury, or delegate, after notice and an opportunity for a proceeding, may impose a monetary penalty on any practitioner who engages in conduct subject to sanction under paragraph (a) of this section. (c)(1)(ii) (ii…
67. T.C. Memo. 2012-221 — Robert L. Bernard & Diolinda B. Abilheira v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 1, 2012related by meaning
    yer's return information. None of the assertions, even if true, would affect petitioners' deficiency. Petitioners' attacks on the Court in relation to its Rules of Practice and Procedure and the rulings in this and other cases lack merit and will not be addressed in this opinion. Adverse rulings are not grounds - 8 - […
68. 85 FR 81658 — Fiduciary Duties Regarding Proxy Voting and Shareholder Rights
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Dec 16, 2020related by meaning
    Back to Citation 54.   See Cent. Hudson Gas & Elec. Corp. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of New York, 447 U.S. 557, 564 (1980). Commenters generally argued that Central Hudson' s commercial speech test would apply. Back to Citation 55.   Clark v. Community for Creative NonViolence, 468 U.S. 288, 293 (1984). Back to Citation 56. …
69. 97 T.C. 237; 97 T.C. No. 14 — Guilzon v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 6, 1991related by meaning
    ent, even if some inconsistency could be said to exist, we find it insufficient to persuade us to agree with the first prong of petitioners’ position. The second prong of petitioners’ position is that section 72 does not, in any event, apply because that section requires that the payment be made “under an annuity * * *…
70. 88 FR 65888 — Federal Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) Process Administrative Fee and Certified IDR Entity Fee Ranges
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Sep 26, 2023
    …the No Surprises Act. U.S.C.-Brookings Schaeffer on Health Policy. https://www.brookings.edu/​blog/​usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/​2021/​03/​16/​recommendations-for-implementing-the-no-surprises-act/​. Back to Citation 127.  United States Census Bureau (March 2020). 2017 SUSB Annual Data Tables by Establishm…
71. T.C. Memo. 1998-24 — Neal A. Sanders, d.b.a. Law Offices of Neal A. Sanders v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 21, 1998related by meaning
    second notice of - 12 - deficiency). Petitioner asserts that the 3-year period of limitations on assessment and collection with respect to 1992 income tax deficiencies (which are joint deficiencies) and for section 4975 excise taxe s for years before 1993 had expired. Petitioner characterizes this assertion as a jurisd…
72. 134 T.C. No. 6 — Karl L. & Deborah Matthies v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 22, 2010related by meaning
    Print 1982) . Sec . 7702 was enacted in 1984 as part of the Deficit Reduction . Act of 1984, Pub . L . 98-369, sec . 221(a), 98 Stat . 767 . Although these statutory amendments . postdate the promulgation of the applicable regulations in 1956, for the reasons . discussed supra we believe that the cross-reference to se…
73. T.C. Memo. 2014-80 — Michael H. Boulware v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 6, 2014related by meaning
    e us to blindly ignore the section 7485 bond requirement. This we can not do. Moreover, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied petitioner's motion to stay collection pending appeal. Therefore, respondent was free to pursue collection action against petitioner, in accordance with his established policies. Pet…