IRCCourt RulingsMay 28, 2003
…on of fact to be resolved upon consideration of the entire
record. DiLeo v. Commissioner
, supra
at 874; Gajewski v. Commis-
sioner
, 67 T.C. 181, 199 (1976), affd. without published opinion
578 F.2d 1383 (8th Cir. 1978). Fraud is never presumed or
imputed and should not be found in circumstances which create at
most o…
81 FR 92639 — Savings Arrangements Established by Qualified State Political Subdivisions for Non-Governmental Employees ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Dec 20, 2016related by meaning
…etirement Savings Board Act, Ch. 557 (H.B. 2960) (2015).
Back to Citation
2. 29 U.S.C. 1002(2)(A). ERISA's Title I provisions “shall apply to any employee benefit plan if it is established or maintained . . . by any employer engaged in commerce or in any industry or activity affecting commerce . . . .” 29 U.S.C. 1003(…
IRCCourt RulingsMar 19, 2025
…the retirement distribution as being subject
to the 10% additional tax . N or did he report the $1, 874 in tax withheld
by Fidelity .
OPINION
I. Burden of Proof
Generally, the Commissioner ’ s determination of a deficiency is
presumed correct. See Rule 142(a). In the case of unreported income, the
presumption adheres o…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 2, 2025
…T.C. 104 (2023).
28
[* 28] cash. See Parks, 94 T.C. at 664– 65; Recklitis v. Commissioner , 91
T.C. 874, 910 (1988); Morse v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-332,
aff’d , 419 F.3d 829 (8th Cir. 2005) ; see also Bradford v. Commissioner,
796 F.2d 303, 307 – 08 (9th Cir. 1986), aff’g T.C. Memo. 1984-601. The
existence of a…
ERISACode / StatuteJan 6, 2025related by meaning
(l) (l) Cross reference For special rules relating to plan provisions adopted to preclude discrimination, see section 1053(c)(2) of this title.
89 FR 43675 — Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2006-06 for Services Provided in Connection With the Termination of Abandoned Individual Account Plans ERISAFinal Rules (FR)May 17, 2024related by meaning
…ther the debtor (or any entity designated by the debtor) serves as the administrator (as defined in ERISA section 3) of an employee benefit plan. ERISA section 3(16) defines the “administrator” as the plan sponsor in the absence of any designation in the plan document of another person as administrator.
Back to Citatio…
ERISACode / StatuteJan 6, 2017related by meaning
(a)(4)(B) (B) in the case of a qualifying event described in paragraph (3) or (5) of section 1163 of this title where the covered employee notifies the administrator under paragraph (3), any qualified beneficiary with respect to such event,
IRCCourt RulingsApr 20, 2017
…ong other things) a likely source of the unreported income. DiLeo v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. 858, 873-874 (1991), M, 959 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1992). Once respondent has produced evidence linking the taxpayer to an income-producing activity, the burden of proof shifts to the taxpayer to prove by a preponderance of the
- 9 -
[…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 29, 2019
…er must establish some basis upon which an estimate may be
made. Norgaard v. Commissioner, 939 F.2d 874, 879 (9th Cir. 1991), aff'g in
part, rev'g in part T.C. Memo. 1989-390; Vanicek v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. at
742-743. Otherwise an allowance would amount to "unguided largesse."
Norgaard v. Commissioner, 939 F.2d at 8…
IRCCourt RulingsMay 15, 1978related by meaning
… section 3002(c) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (hereinafter referred to as ERISA) which provides: Regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Treasury under sections 410(a), 411, and 412 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (relating to minimum participation standards, minimum vesting standards,…
78 FR 13781 — Filings Required of Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements and Certain Other Related Entities ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Mar 1, 2013related by meaning
ssessment of civil penalties under section 502(c)(5) of ERISA, see §§ 2570.90 through 2570.101 of this chapter.
(2)
Criminal penalties and procedures. For information on criminal penalties under section 519 of ERISA for persons who knowingly make false statements or false representation of fact with regards to the info…
T.C. Memo. 2024-24 — James Elbert Aldridge, Jr. & Shirley Lorraine Aldridge v. Commissioner IRCCourt RulingsFeb 21, 2024
…ud is a question of fact to be resolved upon
consideration of the entire record. DiLeo , 96 T.C. at 874. Fraud is never
presumed and must be established by independent evidence. Minchem
Int’l, Inc. , T.C. Memo. 2015-56, at *45.
R espondent has clearly and convincingly demonstrated for each
year at issue that petitioner…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 9, 2005
…ent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s Federal
income tax of $46,076, an addition to tax of $4,874.85 pursuant
to section 6651(a)(1), an addition to tax of $3,791.55 pursuant
to section 6651(a)(2), and an addition to tax of $910.21 pursuant
to section 6654(a) for the taxable year 1999.
The petition placed in dispu…
85 FR 72934 — Registration Requirements for Pooled Plan Providers ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Nov 16, 2020related by meaning
ministrative Hearings on the Issuance of Cease and Desist Orders Under ERISA Section 521—Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements).
Back to Citation
14. The preamble to the proposal provided that, for purposes of registration, employees of the pooled plan provider would include employees of the pooled employer plan, but…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 24, 1996
…nded
Amount
1
June 30, 1988 $ 529,543
June 30, 1989 574,034
June 30, 1990 694,697
June 30, 1991 739,874
June 30, 1992 871,953
June 30, 1993 926,162
June 30, 1994 1,158,574
1
Because the VEBA Trust reimbursed
Provident for these payments, there is a
slight timing difference resulting from these
disbursements.
Petitioner…
T.C. Memo. 2016-10 — Family Chiropractic Sports Injury & Rehab Clinic, Inc. v. Commissioner IRCCourt RulingsJan 19, 2016related by meaning
…described the antialientation procedures under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), Pub. L. No. 93-406, 88 Stat.
- 14 -
[*14] 829, 29 U.S.C. sec. 1001 (2006), and the Internal Revenue Code in Gallade
v. Commissioner, 106 T.C. 355, 361 (1996), as follows:
ERISA was enacted to establish "a compreh…
IRCCourt RulingsSep 27, 1990
… in the nature of, and for some purposes is, a penalty provision. See Nieto v. Ecker, 845 F.2d 868, 874 n. 6 (9th Cir. 1988); cf. Matter of Unified Control Systems, 586 F.2d 1036, 1039 (5th Cir. 1978); compare Latterman v. United States, 872 F.2d 564, 568-570 (3d Cir. 1989).
Respondent assumes but does not concede that…
ERISACode / StatuteJan 6, 2025related by meaning
(a) (a) Except as provided in sections 1105(b)(1) and 1105(d) of this title, any provision in an agreement or instrument which purports to relieve a fiduciary from responsibility or liability for any responsibility, obligation, or duty under this part shall be void as against public policy.
IRCCourt RulingsJun 24, 1966
…0)
1951 _ 5, 642. 43 1958 _ 2,107.80
1952 - (15,291. 66) 1959 _ 6, 398.16
1953 _ 5,357. 65 1960 _ 1,874.59
1954 - (4,754. 95) 1961 _ 9,205.08
It had always been the consistent policy of petitioner to show concern for its employees and their families in cases of death, and to provide fringe benefits to employees as an i…
ERISACode / StatuteJan 6, 2025related by meaning
(f)(4)(C) (C) may be provided in written, electronic, or other appropriate form to the extent such form is reasonably accessible to persons to whom the notice is required to be provided.