Rev. Rul. 2014-24 — This revenue ruling modifies the list of group trust retiree benefit plans eligible to participate in 81–100 group trusts in accordance with the requirements o… IRCRevenue RulingsSep 8, 2014
…splaced by the disaster and modifies other requirements of § 142(d) to accommodate this suspension.
Rev. Proc. 2014–51 Rev. Proc. 2014–51 This revenue procedure provides guidance on certain aspects of an entity’s qualification as a real estate investment trust (REIT) in the context of transactions involving debt secure…
Notice 2026-33 — This notice provides guidance with respect to section 334 of Division T of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Pub. L. 117-328, 136 Stat. 3559 (2022), k… IRCNoticesJun 8, 2026
term rate is set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 467.—Certain Payments for the Use of Property or Services The applicable federal short-term, mid-term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month of June 2026. See Rev. Rul. 2026-11, page 1570.
Section 468.—Special Rules f…
IRCCourt RulingsMay 27, 1968related by meaning
…ther cases. Decisions will be entered under Rude 60.
All Code references herein are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.
Petitioner points to Rev. Rul. 66—12, 1966— 1 C.B. 72, where respondent approved a salaried-only classification with respect to an employer who had S3 hourly paid employees and 26 salaried employees…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMay 8, 2015
. Rev. Rul. 77-85, 1977-1 C.B. 12, Rev. Rul. 80-274, 1980-2 C.B. 27,
Rev. Rul. 81-225, Rev. Rul. 82-54, 1982-1 C.B. 11, Rev. Rul. 2003-91, 2003-2 C.B. 347, and Rev. Rul. 2003-92, 2003-2 C.B. 350. The rulings stand for the proposition that
contract holders possessing control over the investment of the separate account a…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 25, 1968related by meaning
…rence F. Buckley, 29 T.C. 455 (1957). We recognize that the Commissioner issued in 1958 a series of revenue rulings on the question of “separation from the service” as related to corporate acquisitions. See Rev. Ruls. 58-94, 58-95, 58-96, 58-97, 58-98, 58-99, 1958-1 C.B. 194-204. The revenue ruling most like this case …
IRCCourt RulingsApr 12, 1976
…f simplicity the partial termination of the plan is referred to as the termination of the plan.
See Rev. Rul. 58-94, 1958-1 C.B. 194; Rev. Rul. 58-95, 1958-1 C.B. 197; Rev. Rul. 58-96,1958-1 C.B. 200; Rev. Rul. 58-97,1958-1 C.B. 201; Rev. Rul. 58-98,1958-1 C.B. 202; Rev. Rul. 58-383,1958-2 C.B. 149; Rev. Rul. 65-147,19…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsDec 18, 2015related by meaning
…sions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be
applicable thereto. These rulings exp ress no opinion with respect to whether Plan 1 or Plan 2 satisfies the
requirements of section 403(b).
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may no…
Rev. Rul. 2008-13 — Performance-based compensation. This ruling holds that compensation paid to an executive is not qualified performance-based compensation for purposes of sectio… IRCRevenue RulingsMar 10, 2008
INCOME TAX
Rev. Rul. 2008-11 Rev. Rul. 2008-11
Federal rates; adjusted federal rates; adjusted federal long-term rate and the long-term exempt rate. For purposes of sections 382, 642, 1274, 1288, and other sections of the Code, tables set forth the rates for March 2008.
Rev. Rul. 2008-12 Rev. Rul. 2008-12
Application o…
Rev. Proc. 2015-28 — This revenue procedure contains modifications to Revenue Procedure 2013–12, 2013–4 I.R.B. 313. The modifications reflected in this revenue procedure include ne… IRCRevenue ProceduresApr 20, 2015related by meaning
…ve election because the employee was improperly excluded from the plan.
SECTION 4. MODIFICATIONS TO REV. PROC. 2013–12 .01 Appendix A of Rev. Proc. 2013–12 is revised to add the following new section .05(8) to Appendix A. As revised, section .05(8) of Appendix A reads as follows:
54 T.C. 1057 — Bernard McMenamy, Contractor, Inc. v. Commissioner IRCCourt RulingsMay 25, 1970
…ovision of the regulations was adopted, the respondent issued I.T. 3685, 1944 C.B. 324, restated in Rev. Rul. 68-653,1968-2 C.B. 177; I.T. 3686, 1944 C.B. 326, restated in Rev. Rul. 68-654, 1968-2 C.B. 179; and P.S. No. 28 (1944), restated in Rev. Rul. 68-652, 1968-2 C.B. 176. In these rulings, he made clear that in hi…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsAug 27, 1999related by meaning
…al
or is not relevant to the issue presented in this
technical advice request.
5
The application of Rev. Rul. 54-608 was delayed by Rev. Rul. 55-246,
1955-1 C.B. 68; Rev. Rul. 56-315, 1956-2 C.B. 304; Rev. Rul. 57-28, 1957-1
C.B. 193; and Rev. Rul. 57-325, 1957-2 C.B. 302. Congress further delayed the
application of Re…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 11, 1980
and Effects,” 52 Minn. L. Rev. 1198 (1968); H. Dederick, “What Constitutes Discrimination in Pension and Profit-Sharing Plans?”, 22 J. Tax. 272(1965). An approach more favorable to petitioners would include in the computations Higgins’ Social Security (PICA) contributions. Liberty Machine Works, Inc. v. Commissioner, 6…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJan 17, 2003related by meaning
See section 12.04 of Rev. Proc. 2002-1, 2002-1 I.R.B. 1, 50.
However, when the criteria in section 12.05 of Rev. Proc. 2002-1 are satisfied, a ruling is not revoked or modified retroactively except in rare or unusual circumstances.
Sincerely yours,
ROBERT D. PATCHELL
Chief, Qualified Plans Branch 2
Office of the Associ…