Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 1983-733 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
73 documents · 0.26sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. T.C. Memo. 1996-272 — Tommy L. & Patricia A. Hobson v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 12, 1996related by meaning
    tioner's distribution. Section 72(t) provides: (1) Imposition of additional tax.--If any taxpayer receives any amount from a qualified retirement plan * * *, the taxpayer's tax * * * for the taxable year in which such amount is received shall be increased by an amount equal to 10 percent of the portion of such amount w…
  2. T.C. Memo. 2005-86 — Lisa Beth Levine v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 14, 2005related by meaning
    gard to any burden-shifting rule. See Williams v. Commissioner , 123 T.C. 144 (2004). Background This case was submitted to the Court fully stipulated pursuant to Rule 122. Petitioner resided in Berwyn Heights, Maryland, when she filed her petition in this case. A. Service Provided to the State Department Pursuant to P…
  3. 90 T.C. 862; 90 T.C. No. 58 — New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 9, 1988
    …plans did not arise in the context of a determination as to whether the plan was qualified. (G) The 1983 Application Thereafter, the trustees of the Teamsters Fund, also claiming to act as successor trustees of the Brewery Workers Fund, filed another request for a determination, dated September 30, 1983, with the Distr…
  4. T.C. Memo. 1996-421 — Joe M. & Patricia M. Brown v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 18, 1996related by meaning
    T.C. Memo. 1996-421 UNITED STATES TAX COURT JOE M. AND PATRICIA M. BROWN, Petitioners v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 9129-93. Filed September 18, 1996. Robert O. Kazary , for petitioners. Alan R. Peregoy , for respondent. MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION DAWSON, Judge : This case was…
  5. 82 T.C. 152; 82 T.C. No. 14 — Baetens v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 26, 1984
    …e statute, or are unreasonable. See, e.g., Edward L. Stephenson Trust v. Commissioner, 81 T.C. 283 (1983); Durbin Paper Stock Co. v. Commissioner, 80 T.C. 252 (1983); Gresham v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 322 (1982), on appeal (10th Cir., Jan. 24, 1983); Estate of Boeshore v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. 523 (1982); State of Washi…
  6. T.C. Memo. 2011-56 — Delores Chenault v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 9, 2011related by meaning
    16determination to proceed with the-proposed levy as a permissible exercise of discretion. We have considered all' arguments raised by the parties and have found those arguments not discussed here-in to be irrelevant or without merit. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent.
  7. T.C. Memo. 1996-365 — Timothy W. & Suzanne M. Coffield v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 8, 1996related by meaning
    to the Internal Revenue Code by section 302 of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2, Pub. L. 104-168, authorizes this Court to review the Secretary's failure to abate interest with respect to requests for abatement after July 30, 1996. Because this case does not involve a request for abatement after July 30, 1996, we lack jur…
  8. T.C. Memo. 1995-469 — C. Merritt & Dorothy Pumphrey v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 3, 1995related by meaning
    T.C. Memo. 1995-469 UNITED STATES TAX COURT C. MERRITT and DOROTHY PUMPHREY, Petitioners v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 13538-94. Filed October 3, 1995. Jay Fred Cohen , for petitioners. Alan R. Peregoy , for respondent. MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION DAWSON, Judge : This case was …
  9. 88 FR 75890 — Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment Advice Fiduciary
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023
    agencies/​ebsa/​about-ebsa/​our-activities/​resource-center/​advisory-opinions/​1983-60a. Back to Citation 133.   Id. Back to Citation 134.   Id.; see Letter from the Department of Labor to the Securities Industry Association (Mar. 1, 1984) (declining to modify this position); see also IB 96-1, 61 FR 29586, 29589 at fn…
  10. 83 FR 614 — Definition of “Employer” Under Section 3(5) of ERISA-Association Health Plans
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 5, 2018
    Congress has enacted reforms to curb MEWA abuse. Prior to 1983, a number of States attempted to subject MEWAs to State insurance law requirements but were frustrated in their regulatory and enforcement efforts by MEWA-promoter claims of ERISA-plan status and federal preemption. Recognizing that it was both appropriate …
  11. Rev. Proc. 2014-5 — Revised procedures are provided for furnishing technical advice to area managers and appeals office by the Office of the Division Commissioner, Tax Exempt and …
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 2, 2014related by meaning
    P or EO Technical must mail the taxpayer its final administrative conclusion about the deletions to be made. When no copy is given to the taxpayer .06 If EP or EO Technical tells the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the Appeals Area Director that a copy of the TAM should not be give…
  12. 81 FR 43430 — Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Catch-Up Adjustments
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jul 1, 2016
    he Prior Inflation Adjustment Act was set in 1983 and is the same as the existing maximum penalty amount. See MSPA, Public Law 97-470 (Jan. 14, 1983). To adjust the existing civil money penalty for this paragraph, the Department multiplied that maximum penalty amount by the inflation adjustment factor for 1983 of 2.354…
  13. T.D. 9294 — Final regulations under section 401 of the Code set forth standards for electronic systems that make use of an electronic medium to provide a notice to a recip…
    IRCTreasury DecisionsNov 27, 2006related by meaning
    vide an applicable notice or to make a participant election merely because the notice or election was not in writing or written form. Special Analyses It has been determined that this Treasury Decision is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore a regulatory assessment is not r…