Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 1994-310 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
66 documents · 0.24sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 59 T.C. 598; 59 T.C. No. 59 — Thriftimart, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 31, 1973related by meaning
    for any payment of any specific amount to any employee until the conditions of that employee having medical services or being away from work occurred. In Simplified Tax Records, Inc., 41 T.C. 75, 79 (1963), in disallowing a deduction to the taxpayer for a reserve for the estimated future cost of preparing subscribers’ …
  2. Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(4)-13(c)(6) — Effective dates and fresh-start rules.
    IRCRegulationsMay 18, 2016
    …lied by the employee's years of service for Employer X up to 40. (b) For plan years beginning after 1994, Employer X amends the plan formula to provide a normal retirement benefit of 0.75 percent of average annual compensation up to covered compensation multiplied by the employee's total years of service for Employer X…
  3. T.C. Memo. 2014-106 — Whistleblower 10949-13W v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 4, 2014related by meaning
    hey would establish that respondent proceeded against the targets using information the whistleblower provided after December 20, 2006. If these facts are established, the whistleblower is entitled to judicial review of respondent's award determination. We hold, consistent with the rationale of Dacosta, that this Court…
  4. 111 T.C. No. 20 — Dona Elizabeth Conway v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 30, 1998
    e home. In 1994, petitioner paid a $10,000 consulting fee relating to a family business plan and to the acquisition and the sale of personal property. In 1994, petitioner received $5,149 as a distribution from an individual retirement account (IRA) that petitioner maintained at Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Co. (…
  5. T.C. Memo. 2017-3 — Candace Elaine v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 3, 2017related by meaning
    he extent they are not addressed herein, we find them to be moot, irrelevant, or without merit. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent as to the deficiency and for petitioner as to the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a).
  6. 24 T.C. 460 — Northwest Automatic Products Corp. v. United States
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 23, 1955related by meaning
    h respect to this matter is hereby set for_ at_if that time is not convenient, kindly advise us promptly in order that a continuance may- be arranged. This notice, sent by registered mail, constitutes commencement of the renegotiation proceedings in conformity with the provisions of subsection (c) (1) of the Renegotiat…