IRCCourt RulingsJun 18, 1999related by meaning
1402(a). We therefore simply sustain
respondent's determination as respondent did not assert an
increased deficiency in this regard. See sec. 6214(a). used for retirement purposes, a 10 percent penalty is generally
imposed on IRA distributions made before the taxpayer reaches age
59-1/2. See sec. 72(t). In that regard,…
IRCCourt RulingsOct 10, 2018
ry 27, 2011, check. The check did not clear, either because of the hold on
petitioners' account (before February 28, 2011) or because the funds in the account had been transferred to the IRS (after February 28, 2011). Because
petitioners' check did not clear, respondent reversed application of the check
against their 2…
IRCCourt RulingsFeb 10, 2009related by meaning
ic v . ,Commissioner , T .C . Memo . 1992--
609 ; sec . 1 .72-17A(f)(4), Income Tax Regs . .
In 2006 petitioner discontinued the self-destructive life choices which had previously increased the severity of her
medical condition
. She explained at trial that although she
received treatment from doctors in 2005, she did …
84 FR 56894 — Default Electronic Disclosure by Employee Pension Benefit Plans Under ERISA ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Oct 23, 2019
…ections 401(k)(13)(E) and 414(w)(4) for automatic contribution arrangements.
(iv) Technical Release 2011-03R On December 8, 2011, the Department issued Technical Release 2011-03R (TR 2011-03R), which sets forth an interim enforcement policy regarding the use of electronic media to satisfy the disclosure requirements un…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 10, 2017related by meaning
09).
Petitioners concede that none of the exceptions in section 72(t)(2) applies with
respect to all or any portion of their retirement distribution.3 On the record before us, we find that petitioners are liable for their taxable
year 2008 for the 10-percent additional tax imposed by section 72(t)(1) with
respect to th…
IRCCourt RulingsFeb 4, 1998related by meaning
ng warned by the Court
and after having received notice from the Court in a prior case.
6
On the basis of the record, we conclude that the proceedings herein were instituted primarily for delay and that petitioner's
position is both frivolous and groundless. Accordingly, we
exercise our discretion and award a penalty t…
IRCCourt RulingsDec 29, 2005related by meaning
. ADM. ||
RVICE
STAT.
. . |S57-f JUDGE
' j FILES 042 t
T.C. Memo. 2005-298
UNITED STATES TAX COURT
ISABELLE BICHINDARITZ, Petitioner 1.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondént
Docket No. 16098-0.3. Filed December 29, 2005.
Scott A. Schumacher, for petitioner.
Catherine L. Campbell, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM FINDI…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 29, 2019related by meaning
made by the parties and, to the
extent they are not addressed herein, we find them to be moot, irrelevant, or
without merit.
To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered under
Rule 155.
IRCCourt RulingsDec 8, 2010related by meaning
iency on November 24,
2008. Pursuant to section 6503(a) (1), the mailing of the notice
of deficiency tolled the limitations period until 60 days after our final decision. Petitioners are required to retain records
- 8 -
"so long as the contents thereof may become material in the
administration of any internal revenue l…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 8, 2020related by meaning
s, including the experience, knowledge, and
education of the taxpayer." Ibid.
Petitioner prepared her 2016 return during a very tumultuous time in her life. We found credible her testimony that she attempted to report her tax liability
correctly. She reported the full amount of the IRA distributions she received
($54,5…
IRCCourt RulingsMay 8, 2006related by meaning
002, it could not have been determined
whether petitioner had any overpayment with respect to taxable
year 2002.
petitioner’s overpayment for 2001.
10 The disallowance of the
credit that petitioner claimed with respect to this item does not
affect the amount of petitioner’s deficiency for 2002. See sec.
6211(a) (defini…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 25, 2013related by meaning
T.C. Summary Opinion 2013-51
UNITED STATES TAX COURT
MARTIN TOOMBS, Petitioner v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Docket No. 27665-10S. Filed June 25, 2013.
James O. Creech III, for petitioner.
Thomas D. Yang, for respondent.
SUMMARY OPINION
ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the
p…
IRCCourt RulingsMay 29, 1997related by meaning
…
prior years. Easter v. Commissioner
, 338 F.2d 968, 969-970 (4th
Cir. 1964), affg. per curiam T.C. Memo. 1964-58; Rose v.
Commissioner
, 55 T.C. 28, 32 (1970). We reject petitioners’
argument that an exception to this rule applies to disputes
involving $10,000 or less.
To reflect the foregoing,
Decision will be entere…
IRCCourt RulingsDec 19, 1995
…fer Refund does not constitute a qualified total
distribution. See Wittstadt v. Commissioner
, T.C. Memo. 1995492; Humberson v. Commissioner
, T.C. Memo. 1995-470; Pumphrey v.
Commissioner
, T.C. Memo. 1995-469 ; Adler v. Commissioner
, T.C.
Memo. 1995-148; Dorsey v. Commissioner
, T.C. Memo. 1995-97; Brown
v. Commissi…
IRCCourt RulingsMar 14, 2019related by meaning
ho conducted petitioner's CDP hearing, a USPS document relating to the
notice of deficiency for 2012, and a copy of this Court's order and decision in Wesley v. Commissioner, docket No. 6560-14L.
At trial petitioner offered and we admitted into evidence a screen shot of
information he had downloaded from the USPS track…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 6, 2019related by meaning
erwork if she agreed to the proposed monthly payment. SO Taylor also stated
that if petitioner did not agree to the proposed amount, she would need to complete a Form 433-A, Collection Information Statement for Wage Earners and
Self-Employed Individuals, before they could discuss other options.
Petitioner did not respo…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 26, 1984related by meaning
shall not apply to amounts described in clause (ii) of subparagraph (A) of section 72(mX5) to the extent that section 72(mX5) applies to such amounts. (J) Unrealized appreciation op employer securities. — In the case of any distribution including securities of the employer corporation which, without regard to the requi…