Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 2012-252 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
77 documents · 0.23sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. T.C. Memo. 1996-263 — Richard J. & Adele S. Montgomery v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 11, 1996related by meaning
    g, we give effect to the plain meaning of the words used therein and sustain respondent's determination that petitioners are liable for the 10-percent additional tax under section 72(t). We have considered petitioners' remaining arguments and find them unpersuasive. 3. Conclusion In order to give effect to our disposit…
  2. T.C. Memo. 2017-112 — Whistleblower 19860-15W v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 13, 2017related by meaning
    and after the effective date of section 7623(b). See Whistleblower 1133213W v. Commissioner, 142 T.C. 396. In that case we held that the determinative issue is whether the whistleblower alleged facts that, if proven, would establish that the Commissioner proceeded against the targets using information that the whistleb…
  3. T.C. Memo. 1995-599 — Rhett B. & Sandra L. Ross v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 19, 1995
    …fer Refund does not constitute a qualified total distribution. See Wittstadt v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1995492; Humberson v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1995-470; Pumphrey v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1995-469 ; Adler v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1995-148; Dorsey v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1995-97; Brown v. Commissi…
  4. Notice 2013-2 — Weighted average interest rate update; corporate bond indices; 30-year Treasury securities; segment rates. This notice contains updates for the corporate bond …
    IRCNoticesFeb 4, 2013
    …Segment Rates First Segment Second Segment Third Segment 1.62 4.40 5.45 For plan years beginning in 2012, the 24-month average segment rates determined under § 430(h)(2)(C)(iv) must be not less than 90% nor greater than 110% of the 25-year average segment rates. Pursuant to Notice 2012-55, 2012-36 I.R.B. 332, the first…
  5. T.C. Summary Opinion 2013-51 — Martin Toombs v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 25, 2013related by meaning
    T.C. Summary Opinion 2013-51 UNITED STATES TAX COURT MARTIN TOOMBS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 27665-10S. Filed June 25, 2013. James O. Creech III, for petitioner. Thomas D. Yang, for respondent. SUMMARY OPINION ARMEN, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the p…
  6. T.C. Memo. 1996-365 — Timothy W. & Suzanne M. Coffield v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 8, 1996related by meaning
    to the Internal Revenue Code by section 302 of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2, Pub. L. 104-168, authorizes this Court to review the Secretary's failure to abate interest with respect to requests for abatement after July 30, 1996. Because this case does not involve a request for abatement after July 30, 1996, we lack jur…
  7. T.C. Memo. 2012-94 — Child Adult Intervention Services, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 28, 2012related by meaning
    …37, 260 (2006), rev'd on other grounds, 514 F.3d 1119 (10th Cir. 2008); Vines v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2009-267, aff'd, 418 Fed. Appx. 900 (11th Cir. 2011); Johnson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-73. Petitioner has made no valid challenge to the appropriateness of the proposed levy. In any event, from our review o…
  8. T.C. Memo. 2012-44 — James Anthony Fonteneaux, Sr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 21, 2012related by meaning
    Respondent prepared decisiori.documents reflecting respolident's concessions of all issues for 2005 and a reduced deficiency;and addition to tax for . 2006. Petitioner repudiated the settlement and sought complete victöry and . sanctions against respondent based on "reckless professional behavior." Petitioner is frustr…
  9. T.C. Memo. 2017-132 — Jack Howard Taylor v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 5, 2017related by meaning
    5, and bore a postmark indicating that it was mailed by FedEx Standard Overnight service on July 6, 2015. Since the petition was mailed timely using a - 6 - [*6] designated private delivery service, see Notice 2015-38, 2015-21 I.R.B. 984, it is treated as filed timely, see sec. 7502(a), (f). Discussion I. Overview Gene…
  10. T.C. Memo. 2019-145 — Jane M. Lassek, Petitioner and Michael E. Smith, Intervenor v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 28, 2019
    …collection action. Petitioner concedes that she is liable for the overreported income tax withheld. 2012 Underpayment In 2012 petitioner took an $11,000 taxable distribution from her section 401(k) retirement plan account, and intervenor took a $23,510 distribution from his section 401(k) retirement plan account, $23,4…
  11. 92 T.C. 376; 92 T.C. No. 24 — Foil v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 22, 1989related by meaning
    the text of TEFRA section 252. See Gunther v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 39, 56-57, 60, 64-65 (1989); Pallottini v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 498, 503 (1988). If we may paraphrase the conclusion and direction of the Supreme Court in Aaron v. SEC, 446 U.S. 680, 700 (1980), “It seems clear, therefore, that the legislative histor…
  12. T.C. Memo. 2016-182 — Dora Marie Martinez & Carlos Garcia v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 28, 2016
    … or - 5 - [*5] erroneous. See Hardy v. Commissioner, 181 F.3d 1002, 1004-1005 (9th Cir. 1999), T.C. Memo. 1997-97; Tokarski v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 74, 76-77
  13. T.C. Memo. 2006-22 — Teresa J. Fox v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 13, 2006related by meaning
    mmissioner,.119 T.C. 306,. 311 (2002), affd. 101 Fed. Appx. 34 (6th Cir. 2004); Jonson v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 106, 125 (2002), affd. 35.3 F.3d 1181 (10th Cir. 2003); Butler v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 276, 289-290 (2000). Our determination under section 6015(e) relating. to petitioner's eligibility for relief under se…
  14. T.C. Memo. 2017-139 — Louelia Salomon Frias & Mervyngil Salomon v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 11, 2017
    ommissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-421. Section 1.72(p)-1, Q&A-10(a), Income Tax Regs., provides that ordinarily the failure to make any installment payment when due7 violates the substantially level amortization requirement. However, the substantially level amortization requirement is not violated so long as a payment, even…
  15. T.C. Memo. 2025-7 — Sonji Marie Mosley v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 22, 2025related by meaning
    United States Tax Court T.C. Memo. 2025-7 SONJI MARIE MOSLEY , Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent __________ Docket No. 11872-22. Filed January 22, 2025. __________ Sonji Marie Mosley , pro se. Xheni D. Gallagher, Timothy R. Prosky, and Olivia H. Rembach , for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION ASHF…
  16. 79 FR 10296 — Ninety-Day Waiting Period Limitation and Technical Amendments to Certain Health Coverage Requirements Under the Affordable Care Act
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Feb 24, 2014
    …(3)(iii), and 45 CFR 146.111(a)(3)(iii). Back to Citation 4.  Department of Labor Technical Release 2012-01, IRS Notice 2012-17, and HHS FAQs issued February 9, 2012. Back to Citation 5.  Department of Labor Technical Release 2012-02, IRS Notice 2012-59, and HHS FAQs issued August 31, 2012. Back to Citation 6.   See 26…
  17. T.C. Memo. 2002-130 — Ray C. & Bernadette B. Baas v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 29, 2002related by meaning
    … however, there was no levy by respondent in this case. Similarly, in Murillo v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-13, affd. without published opinion 166 F.3d 1201 (2d Cir. 1998), also cited by petitioner, the taxpayer was indicted on charges of violating Federal currency transaction reporting laws. As part of the taxpaye…