Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 55 T.C. 142 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
92 documents · 0.22sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 56 T.C. 263 — Smith v. Comm'r
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 12, 1971related by meaning
    g $1,000, may (under regulations prescribed by the Secretary or his delegate) be returned on the basis and in the manner prescribed in subsection (a). Harold and Caroline reported $10,224.57 as long-term capital gain in. 1964 and $30,673.70 as long-term capital gain in each subsequent year. Assuming that the annual pay…
  2. T.C. Memo. 1998-36 — Neil M. Baizer v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 27, 1998related by meaning
    articipants, Harold Breslow and Robert Levine, received their full benefit and petitioner signed an irrevocable waiver of his rights to Plan benefits. We reject petitioner's argument. Examining the record, we find no documentary evidence that all rank and file employees were paid their full vested interest, especially …
  3. T.C. Summary Opinion 2006-90 — Juanita Doby v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 25, 2006
    …iciency is presumed correct. Welch v. Helvering , 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). In pertinent part, Rule 142(a)(1) provides the general rule that “The burden of proof shall be upon the petitioner”. In certain circumstances, however, if the taxpayer introduces credible evidence with respect to any factual issue relevant to a…
  4. T.C. Memo. 1997-20 — Jerry L. Burton v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 13, 1997related by meaning
    …. Since respondent asserts an increased deficiency, she has the burden of proof on this issue. Rule 142(a). However, the parties stipulated that $20,655.42 of that distribution is taxable income to petitioner. The parties further stipulated that if the Court holds that the total amount of the retirement accounts distri…
  5. U.S. Tax Court — Timothy D. Nelson v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 16, 2010
    …correct, and the taxpayer bears the burden of proving that the determination is in error . See Rule 142(a) ; Welch v . Helvering , 290 U .S . 111, 115 (1933) . Pursuant to section 7491(a), the burden of proof as to,factual matters shifts to the Commissioner under certain circumstances . Petitioner has neither alleged t…
  6. T.C. Memo. 1996-450 — Theodore Souris, P.C., a dissolved corporation, and Theodore Souris, as successor in interest of Theodore Souris, P.C. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 2, 1996related by meaning
    g the term "employer reversion" subsection (c) begins with the words "For purposes of this section". Yet, as just indicated, both parties in this case treat the section 4980(c)(2) definition as applicable here for purposes of the income tax . Indeed this Court has so indicated. Lee Engineering Supply Co. v. Commissione…
  7. T.C. Memo. 2010-142 — Ronald W. Parkinson v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 28, 2010
    …epresents payment for- ;physical :injuries . The burden of-proof ; is on petitioner .' { See'_ Rule 142 ( a ) On brief, -although` he concedesx«that° he "bears the burden of proving respondent' s . determinationto-be erroneous", petitione r 'Petitioner has not claimed or shown that he meets the requirements under sec .…
  8. T.C. Memo. 2015-244 — Jeremiah J. O'Connor & Mary K. O'Connor v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 16, 2015
    …as the amount of the penalty, $28,483, is exactly 20% of the notice's determined tax deficiency of $142,416. B. Applicable Law Section 6662(a) and (b)(1)-(3) provides for an accuracy-related penalty (the penalty) in the amount of20% of the portion of any underpayment attributable to, among other things, negligence or i…
  9. T.C. Memo. 2017-69 — Larry E. Austin & Belinda Austin v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 24, 2017
    …presumed correct, and the taxpayer bears the burden of proving those determinations erroneous. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). Petitioners contend that respondent bears the burden of proof for two reasons: (1) they have satisfied the requirements of section 7491(a) for shifting the burden of …
  10. 89 T.C. 287; 89 T.C. No. 25 — Larotonda v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 13, 1987related by meaning
    alty was designed to cover the situation involved herein. Because of such doubt, we think it judicious to resolve this issue in favor of the taxpayer. Finally, we must decide whether additions to tax pursuant to section 6653(a)(1) and (a)(2) should be imposed. Section 6653(a)(1) provides for an addition to tax of 5 per…
  11. 115 T.C. No. 19 — Flahertys Arden Bowl, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 25, 2000related by meaning
    lity for the excise taxes and that petitioner was liable for the additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1). Discussion I. Liability Under Section 4975 A. The Statutes Section 4975 was added to the Internal Revenue Code by title II of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), Pub. L. 93-406, sec. 2003…
  12. 142 T.C. No. 21 — Whistleblower 11332-13W v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 4, 2014
    142 T.C. No. 21 UNITED STATES TAX COURT WHISTLEBLOWER 11332-13W, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 11332-13W. Filed June 4, 2014. Whistleblower W reported a tax fraud scheme, involving W's employer and related entities, to the Government. W provided the Government with information re…