Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 72 T.C. 677 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
89 documents · 0.29sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. T.C. Memo. 1995-599 — Rhett B. & Sandra L. Ross v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 19, 1995related by meaning
    -2503 at 95-2504, 95-1 USTC par. 50,280 (D. Md. 1995); see also Conway v. United States , supra ; cf. Wheeler v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1993-561. 6 We observe that the definition of "qualified total distribution" set forth in section 402(a)(5)(E)(i)(II) incorporates the definition of "lump sum distribution" set fort…
  2. 82 T.C. 941; 82 T.C. No. 71 — Benbow v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 7, 1984related by meaning
    eived. An exception is provided in § 402(a)(2) for capital gains treatment in specific cases. * * * The exception was always strictly construed. * * * Further expansion of the favored treatment specifically provided in § 402(a)(2) as an exercise of legislative grace is a function for the Congress, not for the Courts. S…
  3. T.C. Summary Opinion 2005-103 — Basman Ahmad & Khitam Amerneh v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 25, 2005related by meaning
    settlement agreement is not a qualified domestic order, and Mr. Ahmad is not an alternate payee, the exception in section 72(t)(2)(C) is inapplicable. In light of the foregoing, the Court holds that petitioners are liable for the 10-percent additional tax imposed under section 72(t). Reviewed and adopted as the report …
  4. T.C. Memo. 1998-336 — Robert A. & Laverne M. Hall v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 22, 1998related by meaning
    te minus amounts received before such date to the extent excludible from gross income. Sec. 72(e)(6). The remainder of petitioner's distribution after determination of the nontaxable amount represents the payment to him of income and as the parties have agreed is subject to the 10-percent premature distribution tax und…
  5. 54 T.C. 702 — Republic Engineers, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 31, 1970related by meaning
    OPINION Quealy, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency in income tax of petitioner for the taxable year September 10, 1965, to June 80, 1966, in the amount of $618.41. The sole issue for decision relates to the deductibility of a payment of $2,000 made to the widow of a former officer of Utilities Engineering & Mana…
  6. 67 T.C. 29 — Federal Land Bank Asso. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 6, 1976related by meaning
    or lack of jurisdiction. Appropriate orders will be issued. Statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, unless otherwise indicated. Sec. 7476 is a new provision of the Internal Revenue Code. It provides taxpayers with a forum in which they may receive determinations of whether their plans are qualifi…
  7. T.C. Memo. 1995-469 — C. Merritt & Dorothy Pumphrey v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 3, 1995related by meaning
    T.C. Memo. 1995-469 UNITED STATES TAX COURT C. MERRITT and DOROTHY PUMPHREY, Petitioners v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 13538-94. Filed October 3, 1995. Jay Fred Cohen , for petitioners. Alan R. Peregoy , for respondent. MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION DAWSON, Judge : This case was …
  8. T.C. Summary Opinion 2003-137 — John & Michele McGovern v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 30, 2003related by meaning
    999 taxable year. Respondent contends that, with respect to the $12,880.04 distribution from petitioner’s TSP, petitioners are subject to a 10-percent additional tax on an early distribution from a qualified retirement plan under section 72(t)(1). Petitioners contend that they are not subject to the 10percent additiona…
  9. T.C. Memo. 1998-407 — Stephen Neal Swihart v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 13, 1998related by meaning
    s in which taxpayers have sought to avoid the 10-percent additional tax under section 72(t). We repeatedly have ruled that we are bound by the list of statutory exceptions to section 72(t) contained in section 72(t)(2)(A). See, e.g., Clark v. Commissioner , 101 T.C. 215, 224-225 (1993); Vorwald v. Commissioner , T.C. M…