Brief Case
Pension Resource

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 77 T.C. 1275 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
85 documents · 0.22sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. T.C. Memo. 1998-336 — Robert A. & Laverne M. Hall v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 22, 1998related by meaning
    te minus amounts received before such date to the extent excludible from gross income. Sec. 72(e)(6). The remainder of petitioner's distribution after determination of the nontaxable amount represents the payment to him of income and as the parties have agreed is subject to the 10-percent premature distribution tax und…
  2. T.C. Memo. 2013-10 — Robert A. & Pearl Fletcher v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 14, 2013related by meaning
    Mr. Villasenor was injured on or about May 13, 2000. Although the file is much more extensive than that of Ms. Muriel and it appears that petitioners hired and paid attorneys through 20 3 to handle the appeal of the worker's compensation claim, Ms. Strick's name does not appear on any of the documents, and she did not…
  3. T.C. Summary Opinion 2001-69 — Marsha K. Huggins v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 14, 2001related by meaning
    December 19, 1989, - 6 - for tax years ending after the date of enactment. See OBRA sec. 7841(a)(3), 103 Stat. 2428. The court order in this case was issued in 1985; it precedes the effective date of section 414(p)(11) and cannot qualify as a QDRO. The decree provided that petitioner is to receive a "sum of money equa…
  4. T.C. Memo. 1999-59 — Robert J. Geiger v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 1, 1999related by meaning
    me-generating activities relating to the items of income, he has satisfied that obligation through the introduction of predicate evidence. Absent some showing by petitioner as to how the distribution in liquidation should have been divided between himself and his spouse, there is no basis for making any apportionment. …
  5. 115 T.C. No. 19 — Flahertys Arden Bowl, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 25, 2000related by meaning
    lity for the excise taxes and that petitioner was liable for the additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1). Discussion I. Liability Under Section 4975 A. The Statutes Section 4975 was added to the Internal Revenue Code by title II of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), Pub. L. 93-406, sec. 2003…