Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 83 T.C. 742 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
93 documents · 0.19sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 115 T.C. No. 5 — Wan B. & Cecilia Lo v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 31, 2000related by meaning
    on with the performance of services, property is transferred to any person other than the person for whom such services are performed, the excess of-- (1) the fair market value of such property (determined without regard to any restriction other than a restriction which by its terms will never lapse) at the first time …
  2. T.C. Summary Opinion 2015-60 — Cheryl Lynn Ireland v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 1, 2015related by meaning
    ioner, 106 T.C. 337, 340 (1996) (citing and discussing the legislative history underlying section 408(f), the statutory predecessor to section 72(t)); Milner v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-111. Section 72(t)(2)(B) provides an exception to the imposition of additional tax to the extent that retirement plan distributio…
  3. T.C. Summary Opinion 2004-135 — Charlotte Marie Scott v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 30, 2004related by meaning
    etitioner did not “roll over” her distributions pursuant to section 408(d)(3). - 6 - Therefore, in order for petitioner to prevail, she must show that the distributions fall under one of the exceptions under section 72(t)(2). With respect to section 72(t), this Court has repeatedly held that it is bound by the list of …
  4. T.C. Memo. 2011-58 — Erin N. Hellweg v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 9, 2011related by meaning
    4 (1984); see United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001). Although they may be entitled to deference under Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134 (1944), see United States v. Mead Corp., supra, we need not decide whether Notice 2004-8, supra, should be given Skidmore deference because the Transaction does not féll…
  5. T.C. Memo. 2010-263 — Ernestine Forrest v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 2010
    …; Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 F.2d 540, 543-544 (2d Cir. 1930); Vanicek v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 731, 742-743 (1985). But see sec. 1.274-5T(a), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46014 (Nov. 6, 1985). In these instances, the Court is permitted to approximate the allowable expense, bearing heavily against the taxpay…
  6. T.C. Summary Opinion 2003-83 — Manuel Francisco Palomo & Jane Lyon Potter v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 24, 2003related by meaning
    tract unless such amounts are specifically excluded from gross income under other provisions of chapter 1 of the Code. The burden is on petitioners to demonstrate that the payments in question fall into a specific statutory exclusion. See Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. , 348 U.S. at 429-431. Under section 72(t), a …
  7. T.C. Memo. 2009-140 — James A. Haigh v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 15, 2009
    … . VWe are not required to follow Robinette in this case . See Golsen v . Commissioner , .54 T .C . 742 ., 757 (1970), affd . 445 F .2d 985 (10th Cir . 1971) ; see also Lardas v . Commissioner , 99 T .C . 490, 494-495 (1992) .
  8. T.C. Memo. 1998-336 — Robert A. & Laverne M. Hall v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 22, 1998related by meaning
    te minus amounts received before such date to the extent excludible from gross income. Sec. 72(e)(6). The remainder of petitioner's distribution after determination of the nontaxable amount represents the payment to him of income and as the parties have agreed is subject to the 10-percent premature distribution tax und…
  9. T.C. Memo. 2024-24 — James Elbert Aldridge, Jr. & Shirley Lorraine Aldridge v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 21, 2024
    …RRAINE ALDRIDGE, Petitioner s v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ————— Docket N o. 13 742-10. Filed February 21, 2024. ————— James Elbert Aldridge, Jr., and Shirley Lorraine Aldridge , pro se se . Randall L. Eager, Christina L. Holland , and Shaina E. Boatright , for respondent. MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FAC…
  10. T.C. Memo. 2022-4 — Estate of Anthony K. Washington, Deceased, Lenda Washington, Personal Representative v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 2, 2022
    …iciled when he died and where the Estate is being administered. See Golsen v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 742 (1970), aff’d , 445 F.2d 985 (10th Cir. 1971) . 3 [* 3 ] Two provisions of the Divorce Decree are relevant to this case. The first is the Judgment entered by the court , and the second is a Finding of Fact with respe…
  11. T.C. Memo. 1996-421 — Joe M. & Patricia M. Brown v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 18, 1996related by meaning
    sents taxable earnings from petitioner's IRA and that such amount is properly includable in petitioners' gross income for 1990. Sec. 408(d)(1). - 25 - In view of our conclusion, supra , that petitioner's Transfer Refund qualifies for tax-free rollover treatment in 1989 under section 402(a)(5)(D), we understand petition…
  12. 112 T.C. No. 6 — Gideon L. & Corazon P. Medina v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 22, 1999
    … Medina Excise Taxes Addition to Tax Year Sec. 4975(a) Sec. 4975(b) Sec. 6651(a)(1) 1992 $2,967 -- $742 1993 6,245 -- 1,561 1994 9,868 -- 2,467 1995 13,871 -- 3,468 1996 18,294 -- -- 1997 1 -- $414,769 -- 1 For the taxable period ending June 30, 1997. - 3 - Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the …
  13. 105 T.C. 16; 105 T.C. No. 2 — Snap-Drape v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 13, 1995related by meaning
    ere the detriment is very severe. Beneficial Life Ins. Co. v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 627, 642 (1982); see also CWT Farms, Inc. v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 1054, 1068-1069 (1982) (retroactive application of a regulation was sustained where the taxpayer unjustifiably relied on a handbook published by respondent for guidance)…