Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 84 T.C. 996 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
89 documents · 0.21sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. T.C. Summary Opinion 2006-184 — William Edward & Patricia Marie Colombell v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 30, 2006related by meaning
    1 Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 2002, the taxable year in issue. T.C. Summary Opinion 2006-184 UNITED STATES TAX COURT WILLIAM EDWARD AND PATRICIA MARIE COLOMBELL, Petitioners v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 23979…
  2. T.C. Memo. 1996-263 — Richard J. & Adele S. Montgomery v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 11, 1996related by meaning
    …in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. T.C. Memo. 1996-263 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RICHARD J. MONTGOMERY AND ADELE S. MONTGOMERY, Petitioners v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 8028-94. Filed June 11, 1996. Edward L. Blanton, Jr. , for petitioner…
  3. T.C. Memo. 2000-171 — Van Roekel Farms, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 24, 2000
    996, Mr. Van Roekel and his wife, Darlene, filed joint Federal income tax returns. He worked as petitioner’s farm manager on an independent contractor basis, and, as reflected below, reported the management fees that - 5 - petitioner paid him on a Schedule C, Profit or Loss From Business: Wages, Business Type of salari…
  4. 92 T.C. 641; 92 T.C. No. 35 — Buzzetta Constr. Corp. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 27, 1989related by meaning
    ended returns, The conditions were not met, and it was not an abuse of discretion to disqualify the plan. Revocation of Favorable Determination Letter The Supreme Court has held that the Commissioner has broad discretion under section 7805(b) in deciding whether to revoke a ruling retroactively, and that his determinat…
  5. T.C. Memo. 2004-130 — Ralf Zacky v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 27, 2004related by meaning
    …t petitioner is liable for these additions to tax because he did not file an excise tax return for 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, or 2000. Petitioner argues that these additions to tax do not apply because the plan did not have the money to pay its plan administrator to prepare those returns. We agree with respondent. A disqu…
  6. T.C. Memo. 2015-119 — Clement C. Benenson v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 29, 2015
    …ock in a taxable transaction, or the corporation ceases to qualify as a DISC. Secs. 995(b)(2), (c), 996(a)(1). A DISC sometimes does not generate the income it reports on its returns and might otherwise not be recognized as a corporate entity for tax purposes if it were 7In the 1980s several European nations complained…
  7. 110 T.C. No. 11 — Albert Lemishow v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 18, 1998related by meaning
    lure to report any portion of the distributions. Thus, we find petitioner liable for the negligence penalty imposed on the portion of the underpayment attributable to the $102,519 not used to purchase the stock. In keeping with the above holdings, Decision will be entered under Rule 155 .
  8. T.C. Memo. 2007-292 — Hubert Joubert v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 24, 2007related by meaning
    him . On May 24, 2002, SBC Communications, Inc ., issued a check to petitioner in the amount of $131,317 .46 . The gross amount of the check had been $168,355 .71 . However, $33,671 .14 in Federal income tax and $3,367 .11 in California State income tax had been withheld . During 2002, petitioner also received $9,552 …
  9. 136 T.C. No. 2 — G. Mason Cadwell, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 3, 2011related by meaning
    s, earnings, and reasonable charges) pursuant tb Rev. Proc. 2005-25, 2005-1 C.B. 962. P may not : rŠduce the PERC value by the surrender charge, as it spould be disregarded for valuation purposes pursuant to Rev. Proc . 2005-25, lsupra. Held, further, P must include in his gross income the excess contributiorls pursuan…