Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 104 T.C. 424 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
98 documents · 0.51sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. Treas. Reg. § 1.424-1(b) — Definitions and special rules applicable to statutory options.
    IRCRegulationsJan 19, 2017
    (b) (b) Acquisition of new stock. (b)(1) (1) Section 424(b) provides that the rules provided by sections 421 through 424 which are applicable with respect to stock transferred to an individual upon his exercise of an option, shall likewise be applicable with respect to stock acquired by a distribution or an exchange to…
  2. 136 T.C. No. 2 — G. Mason Cadwell, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 3, 2011related by meaning
    s, earnings, and reasonable charges) pursuant tb Rev. Proc. 2005-25, 2005-1 C.B. 962. P may not : rŠduce the PERC value by the surrender charge, as it spould be disregarded for valuation purposes pursuant to Rev. Proc . 2005-25, lsupra. Held, further, P must include in his gross income the excess contributiorls pursuan…
  3. T.C. Memo. 2005-173 — Transport Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 14, 2005related by meaning
    number of TLC's customers applied the sec. 274(n)(1) limitation to any amounts that they paid to TLC. "Even if we were to allow petitioner to advance petitioner's tax duplication argument, petitioner would not be entitled to the remedy it seeks. If, as petitioner asserts, certain trucking company clients applied the s…
  4. 86 FR 9120 — Net Stable Funding Ratio: Liquidity Risk Measurement Standards and Disclosure Requirements
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Feb 11, 2021
    …mount of retail deposits other than stable retail deposits or brokered deposits, described in § 249.104(c)(1) (row 6); (vii) The average weighted amount and, for each applicable maturity category, the average unweighted amount of sweep deposits, brokered reciprocal deposits, and brokered deposits provided by a retail c…
  5. 160 T.C. No. 3 — 3M Company and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 9, 2023
    of the $5,104,756 trademark royalty payment can be viewed as a $0 adjustment because respondent agrees with the tax reporting of this amount by the 3M consolidated group. Equivalently, one can think of respondent’s position on the tax treatment of the $ 5,104,756 trademark royalty payment as comprising two separate ste…
  6. 108 T.C. No. 5 — George & Elam Campbell v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsFeb 18, 1997related by meaning
    l section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for 1991, the taxable year in issue. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. 2 Sec. 4980A imposes a 15-percent excise tax on excess distributions from qualified retirement plans. This tax is included within ch. 43 of the I…
  7. 81 FR 35124 — Net Stable Funding Ratio: Liquidity Risk Measurement Standards and Disclosure Requirements
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jun 1, 2016
    …amount of retail deposits other than stable retail deposits or brokered deposits, described in § __.104(c)(1) (row 6); (vii) The weighted amount and, for each applicable maturity category, the unweighted amount of brokered deposits provided by a retail customer or counterparty described in §§ __.104(c)(2), __.104(c)(3)…
  8. T.C. SUMMARY OPINION 2020-12 — Edwin D. Benton & Sheila E. Benton v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 11, 2020related by meaning
    little more than guesswork and failed to satisfy the strict substantiation requirements for vehicle expenses prescribed in section 274(d) and related regulations. As noted above the Court may not use the rule established in Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 F.2d at 543-544, to estimate expenses covered by section 274(d). Cons…
  9. T.C. Memo. 2005-298 — Isabelle Bichindaritz v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 29, 2005related by meaning
    d the $1,916 payment as a qualified retirement contribution to an individual retirement account (IRA). She contended in her pretrial memorandum and at trial that she properly deducted that amount as an IRA contribution. In the opening brief, respondent argued that section 219(g)(5) limits IRA deductions for active part…
  10. 29 C.F.R. § 2520.104b-10(g) — Summary Annual Report.
    ERISARegulationsApr 25, 2023
    … with respect to the following: (g)(1) (1) A totally unfunded welfare plan described in 29 CFR 2520.104-44(b)(1)(i); (g)(2) (2) A welfare plan which meets the requirements of 29 CFR 2520.104-20(b); (g)(3) (3) An apprenticeship or other training plan which meets the requirements of 29 CFR 2520.104-22; (g)(4) (4) A pensi…
  11. 145 T.C. No. 1 — John A. Tomassetti & Cathy C. Tomassetti v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 13, 2015related by meaning
    …le, corporate-level proceeding. However, the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-188, sec. 1307(c)(1), 110 Stat. at 1781, repealed those provisions for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1996. Respondent's adjustments to Environmental's income are therefore properly before us in this proc…
  12. T.C. Summary Opinion 2001-165 — William L. & Audrey K. Trace v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 16, 2001related by meaning
    …71-131; White v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1979-6. Petitioners claim that the instruction booklet (“1040 Forms and Instructions”) they used in the preparation of their return is misleading. Putting aside the point that the statute is clear and is controlling, the instructions to which petitioners refer clearly provides…
  13. T.C. Memo. 2005-258 — Joyce M. Thomas v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 1, 2005related by meaning
    bilateral tendinitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, and depression at the time the estimated payments were required to be made. However, during this period, petitioner was employed by Cypress and was running her own startup network marketing business. We find that petitioner was not disabled for purposes of section 6654. The…
  14. Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(b)(5)(v)(D) — Definitions and covered plans.
    IRCRegulationsMay 18, 2016
    …ns and assumptions of stock rights by reason of a corporate transaction. If the requirements of § 1.424-1 (without regard to the requirement described in § 1.424-1(a)(2) that an eligible corporation be the employer of the optionee) would be met if the stock right were a statutory option, the substitution of a new stock…
  15. 66 T.C. 348 — Comprehensive Designers International, Ltd. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 26, 1976related by meaning
    poses of this case, that the credit which petitioner will obtain is precisely equal to the amount of the creditable foreign taxes in terms of dollars. For the reasons stated, we hold that the foreign tax credit available to petitioner for fiscal 1967 should be adjusted to reflect the dollar cost on the payment date of …
  16. Treas. Reg. § 1.421-1(h)(4)(i) — Meaning and use of certain terms.
    IRCRegulationsSep 9, 2016
    …ditional definitions. (h)(1) (1) Corporation. For purposes of this section and §§ 1.421-2 through 1.424-1, the term corporation has the meaning prescribed by section 7701(a)(3) and § 301.7701-2(b) of this chapter. For example, a corporation for purposes of the preceding sentence includes an S corporation (as defined in…
  17. PLR 200424004 — Year of Deduction
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJun 11, 2004related by meaning
    INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE TECHNICA L ADVICE MEMORANDUM January 07, 2004 Number: 200424004 Release Date: 6/11/04 Third Party Contact: Index (UIL) No.: 404.11-00, 446.04-03, 446.04-04 CASE-MIS No.: TAM- 127815-03, CC:ITA:B07 Industry Director ------------------------------------------------ Taxpayer's Name…
  18. T.C. Memo. 2024-6 — Clair R. Couturier, Jr. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 17, 2024related by meaning
    Title 26 U.S.C. (Code) , in effect at all relevant times, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure . Served 01/17/24 2 [* 2 ] deficiencies under section 4973 in th e aggregate amount of $8,476,705 . The notices also determined additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1) and (2) and accurac…
  19. 74 T.C. 808; 2 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2071 — Engineered Timber Sales, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 22, 1980related by meaning
    23 as a contribution to its profit-sharing trust. In his notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed the claimed $16,123 deduction and explained that— (a)(1) The deduction claimed for contributions to your profit-sharing plan for the taxable year ended December 31, 1974 in the amount of $16,123.00 is not allowed becaus…
  20. 91 FR 46602 — Electronic Disclosure by Group Health Plans Under ERISA
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jul 23, 2026
    …n 100 participants to be small entities.[99] The basis of this definition is found in ERISA section 104(a)(2), which permits the Secretary of Labor to prescribe simplified annual reports for plans that cover fewer than 100 participants. Under ERISA section 104(a)(3), the Secretary may also provide for exemptions or sim…