PBGCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Oct 13, 2020
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE FINAL RULE] records under:
(1) Section 552(b)(2) of FOIA, dealing in general with internal agency personnel rules and practices; (2) Section 552(b)(4) of FOIA, dealing in general with trade secrets and commercial and financial information;
(3) Section 552(b)(5) of FOIA, dealing in general with int…
PBGCFinal Rules (FR)Jul 25, 2022
ich include as of August 24, 2022 records under:
(1) Section 552(b)(2) of FOIA, dealing in general with internal agency personnel rules and practices; (2) Section 552(b)(4) of FOIA, dealing in general with trade secrets and commercial and financial information;
(3) Section 552(b)(5) of FOIA, dealing in general with int…
91 FR 9213 — Requirement To Provide Paper Statements in Certain Cases-Amendments to Electronic Disclosure Safe Harbors ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Feb 25, 2026
…cost
Total
hours
Equivalent
cost
(A) (B)
(C)
(A × B)
(A × B × C)
Rule Review (Service Providers)
3552 Service Providers
4
$181.06
14,208
$2,572,500
Rule Review (In-House)
70,322 = 703,224 Small Plans × 10% Not Using a Service Provider
4
181.06
281,290
50,930,295
Total
295,498
53,502,795
Table 19—Cost for Preparation …
IRCCourt RulingsJul 14, 2005related by meaning
number of TLC's customers applied the sec. 274(n)(1) limitation
to any amounts that they paid to TLC.
"Even if we were to allow petitioner to advance petitioner's tax duplication argument, petitioner would not be
entitled to the remedy it seeks. If, as petitioner asserts,
certain trucking company clients applied the s…
PBGCFinal Rules (FR)Jun 13, 2017
…e) of this section, no charge for searching (or in the case of a requester described under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(ii)(II), for duplication) will be assessed if PBGC has failed to comply with any time limit under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6).”
b. Add paragraph (e).
The addition reads as follows:
§ 4901.31
Charges for services.
* *…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 1, 2012related by meaning
4, 2011, but was continued on petitioners' motion so that the parties
could determine the amounts of nondeductible contributions to the IRAs. The case was continued to March 23, 2011, but was thereafter continued again on
petitioners' motion so that they could take a trip out of the country.
By notice served May 9, 201…
PBGCRegulationsAug 24, 2022
(a) (a) In general. Pursuant to the provisions of section 552 of FOIA, as amended, PBGC will assess charges to cover the direct costs of searching for, reviewing, and/or duplicating records requested under FOIA, except where the charges are limited or waived under paragraph (b) or (d) of this section, according to the …
IRCCourt RulingsMar 16, 2015related by meaning
report the initial retirement distribution of $4,984 from State Street;
that his aggregate retirement distribution of $211,499 was includible in gross income; that he was liable under section 72(t) for additional tax equal to 10% of
the retirement distribution includible in gross income; and that he was liable for an
a…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 24, 1995related by meaning
OPINION
Tannenwald, Judge:
Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s 1988 Federal income tax of $11,752 and an addition to tax of $588 under section 6653(a)(1). This case is before us on respondent’s motion for partial summary judgment under Rule 121 that collateral estoppel precludes petitioner’s claim that a…
PBGCRegulationsAug 24, 2022
…e records exempted from FOIA, which include as of August 24, 2022 records under:
(b)(1) (1) Section 552(b)(2) of FOIA, dealing in general with internal agency personnel rules and practices;
(b)(2) (2) Section 552(b)(4) of FOIA, dealing in general with trade secrets and commercial and financial information;
(b)(3) (3) S…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 14, 1982related by meaning
nder the Sixth and Ninth Amendments of the Constitution were not violated by our actions in the instant case.
Decision will be entered under Rule 155. By stipulation, respondent concedes that the $1,562 figure is the product of an erroneous computation in the statutory notice of deficiency and that should respondent pr…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 17, 2024related by meaning
Title 26 U.S.C. (Code) , in effect at all relevant times, and Rule references are to
the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .
Served 01/17/24
2 [* 2 ] deficiencies under section 4973 in th e aggregate amount of
$8,476,705 . The notices also determined additions to tax under section
6651(a)(1) and (2) and accurac…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 13, 2006
…uring the year 2002, petitioner, as an employee and a
participant in the pension plan, withdrew $67,552 .64 from the
plan, the proceeds of which were to fund her daughter's higher
education expenses .
On her Federal income tax return for 2002, petitioner
reported the entire amount of the pension plan withdrawal as
inco…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 6, 1991related by meaning
f the matter is that the payment in question should be taxable to petitioner under section 72(e). Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination.6 In order to take into account what appear to be mechanical errors in respondent’s calculations and to afford the parties a further opportunity to resolve the question of…
IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Oct 31, 2023
…tinues to read as follows:
Authority:
80 Stat. 379; sec. 3, 60 Stat. 238, as amended; 5 U.S.C. 201, 552.
2. Add subpart A before § 323.1;
3. Revise the first sentence of § 323.1; and
4. Add subpart B after § 323.5.
The additions and revision read as follows:
PART 323—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
Authority:
80 Stat. 379; sec. …
T.C. Memo. 1999-80 — Edward Clasby and C. T. Garrahan Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Commissioner IRCCourt RulingsMar 16, 1999related by meaning
itioner and his wife
owned 100 percent of the Garrahan Agency, and since petitioner is
a disqualified person under section 4975(e)(2)(A), the Garrahan Agency is a disqualified person under section 4975(e)(2)(G).
3. Conclusion
The Garrahan Agency is a disqualified person under section
4975(e)(2), and thus it and petitio…
IRCCourt RulingsSep 23, 2019related by meaning
or the taxing
authority that imposed the levy. Petitioners have not shown that they are eligible
for the exception for tax levies under section 72(t). Petitioners also contend that the remaining portion of the $17,500 was a
loan which they used to purchase a home in Vermont in 2013. Petitioners
provided only Form 1099-…
PBGCCode / StatuteJan 6, 2025
…, exempt from disclosure pursuant to subparagraph (B) shall be exempt from disclosure under section 552(b) of title 5. For purposes of such section 552, this subparagraph shall be considered a statute described in subsection (b)(3) of such section 552.
IRCCourt RulingsDec 11, 2003related by meaning
f section 6501,
1
section 6651(a)(1),
2
- 37 -
2
(...continued)
(2003) ; Janpol v. Commissioner
, 102 T.C. 499, 503, 505 (1994);
Beard v. Commissioner , 82 T.C. 766, 780 (1984), affd. per curiam
793 F.2d 139 (6th Cir. 1986) ; Unroe v. Commissioner
, T.C. Memo.
1985-149; Counts v. Commissioner
, T.C. Memo. 1984-561, aff…
IRCCourt RulingsFeb 18, 1998related by meaning
lure to report any portion of
the distributions. Thus, we find petitioner liable for the
negligence penalty imposed on the portion of the underpayment attributable to the $102,519 not used to purchase the stock.
In keeping with the above holdings,
Decision will be entered
under Rule 155
.