IRCCourt RulingsFeb 9, 2023★ strong match
rticle 12 of Law
No. 4,131, of September 3, 1962.
ANTONIO DELFIM NETTO
The English portion of Exhibit 31 - J (Portaria 60/94 ) is:
MF Ordinance No. 60 D.O.U.: 2/01/1994
The MINISTER OF FINANCE, in exercise of its statutory
duties, taking into view the provisions of art. 50 of Law No.
8,383, of December 30, 1991 and Ord…
T.C. Memo. 2026-68 — Malibu Valley Land, LLC, Spectrum Development, Inc., Tax Matters Partner v. Commissioner IRCCourt RulingsAug 17, 2026
… Coastal Act. Redondo Beach
Waterfront , LLC v. City of Redondo Beach, 265 Cal. Rptr. 3d 556 , 564,
569 (Ct. App. 2020). It would not be bound by LA County’s prior
determination. Id. The Coastal Commission has final interpretive
authority over the 2014 LCP. Charles A. Pratt Constr. Co. , 76 Cal. Rptr.
3d at 47 3 .
Acco…
IRCCourt RulingsMay 4, 1978
…he submitted vouchers covering $9,869.90. During fiscal year 1973 he submitted vouchers covering $7,569.14 and charged back $2,050.
During the calendar years 1971, 1972, and 1973 Huffaker received advances for travel and entertainment expenses and submitted vouchers for travel and entertainment expenses as follows:
Yea…
89 FR 32260 — Amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02 ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 25, 2024
… prepare the statement. This results in an hour burden of 9,474 hours with an equivalent cost of $1,569,868.[78]
Table 3—Hour Burden and Equivalent Cost Associated With the Statement of the Care and Loyalty Obligation
Activity
Year 1
Subsequent years
Burden hours
Equivalent burden cost
Burden hours
Equivalent burden co…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsAug 30, 2019
…nt plan under the
objective outlay-of-assets test of Don E. Wi lliams Co. v. Commissioner, 429 U.S. 569
(1977)
This memorandum provides general legal advice on the determination of whether a
contribution by an employer to the employer’s qualified retirement plan has actually
been pai d to the plan’s trust such that the…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 31, 1973related by meaning
for any payment of any specific amount to any employee until the conditions of that employee having medical services or being away from work occurred. In Simplified Tax Records, Inc., 41 T.C. 75, 79 (1963), in disallowing a deduction to the taxpayer for a reserve for the estimated future cost of preparing subscribers’ …
IRCCourt RulingsJul 30, 2007
…nes 35 through 43, zeros on
lines 53 through 59, zero total tax, Federal income tax
withholding of $569, and a claimed refund of $569 . Under Rule
- 5 -
91(f), it was deemed stipulated that petitioner failed to file a
Federal income tax return for 2003 .
IRCCourt RulingsJul 6, 2022related by meaning
and a decision may be rendered as a matter of law. Rule 121(b); Sundstrand Corp. ,
98 T.C. at 520. In deciding whether to grant sum mary judgment, we construe factual materials and inferences drawn from them in the light
most favorable to the nonmoving party (here respondent) . Sundstrand
4
On December 13, 2021, petit…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 17, 2024related by meaning
Title 26 U.S.C. (Code) , in effect at all relevant times, and Rule references are to
the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .
Served 01/17/24
2 [* 2 ] deficiencies under section 4973 in th e aggregate amount of
$8,476,705 . The notices also determined additions to tax under section
6651(a)(1) and (2) and accurac…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 6, 1991related by meaning
f the matter is that the payment in question should be taxable to petitioner under section 72(e). Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination.6 In order to take into account what appear to be mechanical errors in respondent’s calculations and to afford the parties a further opportunity to resolve the question of…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsNov 8, 2019
… employer under section 414(b), (c), (m) or (o).
In Don E. Williams Co. v. Commi ssioner , 429 U.S. 569 (1977), the Supreme Court held
IRCCourt RulingsMay 29, 2002related by meaning
is Court.
Section 72(t) provides that:
(1) * * * If any taxpayer receives any amount from a
qualified retirement plan (as defined in section 4974(c)), the taxpayer's tax * * * shall be increased by an amount
equal to 10 percent of the portion of such amount which is
includible in gross income.
Section 72(t)(2) provides…
Notice 2004-84 — Retirement plans; qualification, list of changes. This notice sets forth a list of changes referred to in Announcement 2004-71, 2004-40 I.R.B. 569, pertaining … IRCNoticesModified Dec 27, 2004
…ist) described in section 10 of the draft revenue procedure in Announcement 2004-71, 2004-40 I.R.B. 569. The Internal Revenue Service intends to annually publish a Cumulative List to identify statutory, regulatory and guidance changes that must be taken into account in a plan sponsor’s submissions to the Service for op…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 17, 1997
…only in the case of an uncertainty.
See Harry A. Wellons, Jr., M.D., S.C. v. Commissioner
, 31 F.3d
569 (7th Cir. 1994), affg. T.C. Memo. 1992-704. Although the
Prime Plan had features of deferred compensation (e.g., the
payment of DWB's upon an employee's termination from employment
based on his or her compensation an…
IRCCourt RulingsDec 18, 2012related by meaning
ly for delay, (2) a taxpayer's position is frivolous or groundless, or (3) a
taxpayer unreasonably failed to pursue available administrative remedies. Section 6673 serves in part as "a penalty statute designed to deter taxpayers from
bringing frivolous or dilatory suits". Sauers v. Commissioner, 771 F.2d 64, 68
(3d Cir…
IRCCourt RulingsMay 31, 1989related by meaning
nal Revenue Code of 1954 as amended and in effect at the relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Sec. 7482(b)(1)(A) establishes venue for appeal in the case of a petitioner other than a corporation. While the parties stipulated that petitioner’s principal office was…
IRCCourt RulingsJun 6, 2019related by meaning
f the distribution to $16,056 in calculating his adjustment to petitioner's
tax liability. We will treat this reduction as a concession by respondent. 6As stated supra, petitioner's ERS plan was a qualified defined benefit plan
under sec. 401(a). The sec. 72(t)(2)(E) exception applies only to distributions
from an "ind…
IRCRegulationsJan 19, 2024
… of $15,000) and the reduction in present value as a result of the amendment is $1,828 ($91,397—$89,569). In this case, the retirement-type subsidy at age 55 is the excess of the present value of the 50% early retirement benefit over the present value of the deferred payment of the accrued benefit, or $13,921 ($97,269—…
IRCCourt RulingsDec 29, 2005related by meaning
d the $1,916 payment as
a qualified retirement contribution to an individual retirement
account (IRA). She contended in her pretrial memorandum and at trial that she properly deducted that amount as an IRA
contribution. In the opening brief, respondent argued that
section 219(g)(5) limits IRA deductions for active part…
Treas. Reg. § 54.9802-4(f)(1)(ix) — Special Rule Allowing Integration of Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs) and Other Account-Based Group Health Plans with Individual Health Insurance Cover… IRCRegulationsAug 19, 2019
…overage to its 10 part-time employees in rating area 1. Plan Sponsor H reasonably expects to employ 569 employees on the first day of the HRA plan year.