Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to 91 T.C. 371 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
84 documents · 0.22sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 88 T.C. 548; 88 T.C. No. 28 — Porter v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 5, 1987★ strong match
    …, all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Our references to secs. 371 and 372 of the Judicial Code are to those sections as in effect during 1980 and 1981. Sec. 372 of the Judicial Code was amended twice by acts with effective dates during 1980 and 1981; Act of October 10, 1980, Pub. L…
  2. T.C. Memo. 2002-166 — Wayne A. McFadden v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 2, 2002
    …in 1995 and 1996, respectively. On his 1995 Federal income tax return, petitioner reported the $170,371 early distribution in gross income and calculated a tax of $17,037 for an early distribution under section 72(t). Petitioner claimed a $136,331 short-term capital loss from the sale of the Atascadero property. Petiti…
  3. 58 T.C. 241 — Estate of Kleemeier v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 8, 1972
    …ecedent, pursuant to paragraph. 10 of CEEF certificate No. P-15073, received CEEF certificate No. N-371-0, which was issued to her for payment of the benefits provided for in CEEF certificate No. P-15073. At the date of decedent’s death, July 4,1966, the total value of the TIAA contract No. S4221-4 issued to decedent w…
  4. 81 FR 21181 — Amendment to and Partial Revocation of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 86-128 for Securities Transactions Involving Employee Benefit Plans and Broker-De…
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Apr 8, 2016related by meaning
    tion. Back to Citation 14.  67 FR 64137 (October 17, 2002). Back to Citation 15.   See Advisory Opinion 2011-08A (June 21, 2011). Back to Citation 16.  As noted above, for purposes of this amendment, the terms “Individual Retirement Account” or “IRA” mean any account or annuity described in Code section 4975(e)(1)(B) t…
  5. T.C. Memo. 2011-139 — Raymond H. & Ana A. Ryan v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 21, 2011
    …S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. Ryan v. Dept. of the Air Force, 375 Fed. Appx. 371 (5th Cir. 2010). Pursuant to rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, we take judicial notice of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit's opinion and rely on it, in part, for the 'history of petitioner's l…
  6. 167 T.C. No. 4 — Piton Holdings, LLC, David L. Hall, Partnership Representative, Petitioner(s) v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 15, 2026
    …iated entity Longleaf, substituted DESE Properties for DESE Research, increased the Property from a 371-acre parcel to a 377.74- acre parcel, and changed the anticipated ownership interests in petitioner. The DESE MIPSA provided that after the clo sing of the transaction DESE Research and Dr. Kirkpatrick would each ret…
  7. 85 T.C. 168; 85 T.C. No. 10 — Eanes v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 30, 1985related by meaning
    the instant case, as the excess of the amount contributed to the IRA for the taxable year over the amount allowable as a deduction under section 219. Since petitioner is not entitled to a deduction under section 219 for his contribution for $1,500 to an IRA in 1981, the entire $1,500 represents an excess contribution …
  8. T.C. Memo. 2012-346 — Esmat Zaklama, Deceased v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 18, 2012
    …ndent also determined in Mr. Zaklama's notice of deficiency that his 1996 gross income included $51,371 of withdrawals from a retirement account and that these withdrawals were subject to the 10% additional tax under section 72(t). OPINION I. Preface The term "gross income" for Federal income tax purposes includes all …
  9. 109 T.C. No. 9 — Square D Company and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 9, 1997related by meaning
    einafter referred to as the instant case). The instant case is before the Court on - 3 - 1 All Code and section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. the parties' cross-motions for partial summary judgment. …
  10. Notice 2024-55 — Certain Exceptions to the 10 Percent Additional Tax Under Code Section 72(t)
    IRCNoticesJul 8, 2024related by meaning
    nal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by section 6103 of the Code. VI. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal authors of this notice are Naomi Lehr, Vernon Carter, and Pamela R. Kinard of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organization…
  11. 88 FR 75890 — Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment Advice Fiduciary
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Nov 3, 2023
    …. The number of PEPs services by small financial institutions is estimated as: (382 PEPs × 97.1%) = 371 PEPs. The burden is estimated as: (371 financial institutions × 2 hours) = 742 hours. A labor rate of $159.34 is used for a legal professional. The labor rate is applied in the following calculation: (371 financial i…
  12. 97 T.C. 385; 97 T.C. No. 27 — Zabolotny v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 30, 1991related by meaning
    o the Internal Revenue Code as amended and in effect for the years in issue. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. This is the figure that appeared on the front page of both notices of deficiency. The computations attached to the notices both used the figure $81,023.94 for the additi…
  13. T.C. Memo. 2007-19 — Bidyut K. & Diana T. Bhattacharyya v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 30, 2007★ strong match
    s were attributable to disability, or that the distributions otherwise qualify for an exception to the 10-percent additional tax. In fact, petitioners state on brief that "Petitioners do understand that petitioners have to pay 10% penalty tax on the amount stated above * * * This is consistent with IRC section 72(t) (1…
  14. 83 T.C. 154; 83 T.C. No. 10 — Tipton & Kalmbach, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 25, 1984related by meaning
    cated, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. See Tipton & Kalmbach, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1982-260. We note, however, that Congress in enacting ERISA appears to have adopted the facts and circumstances test of sec. 1.401-6(b)(2), Income Tax Regs., for determining wheth…
  15. T.D. 9275 — Final regulations under section 410 of the Code implement a statutory directive of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) to am…
    IRCTreasury DecisionsAug 28, 2006related by meaning
    n the information elicited on those line items, as well as the rest of the form, in their books and records. Announcement 2006-56 Announcement 2006-56 This document contains corrections to temporary regulations (T.D. 9262, 2006-24 I.R.B. 1040) concerning the application of section 199 of the Code, which provides a dedu…
  16. 97 T.C. 237; 97 T.C. No. 14 — Guilzon v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 6, 1991related by meaning
    f the matter is that the payment in question should be taxable to petitioner under section 72(e). Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination.6 In order to take into account what appear to be mechanical errors in respondent’s calculations and to afford the parties a further opportunity to resolve the question of…
  17. T.C. Memo. 2011-105 — Mark E. Warmoth v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 19, 2011
    …anagement fee Employee leasing fee 2002 $4,175,000 -02003 4,800,000 $13,067,430 2004 12,000,000 117,371,877 The parties stipulated that "The Gross Receipts claimed by Leading Edge Design's [sic] include management fee income in the amount of $4,595,000 and employee leasing income in the amount of $14,055,577 for the ta…
  18. T.C. Memo. 2005-192 — Arthur F. Millard v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 8, 2005related by meaning
    Commissioner , 83 T.C. 755, 791 n.28 (1984); Kahler v. Commissioner , 18 T.C. 31, 34-35 (1952); Roberts v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 2002-281. In the instant case, the record reflects that the original check was not subject to substantial limitations, and petitioner makes no contention otherwise. Consequently, we find…
  19. T.C. Memo. 2010-263 — Ernestine Forrest v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsDec 2, 2010related by meaning
    wers v. Commissioner, 24 T.C. 199, 239 (1955), affd. 247 F.2d 233 (2d Cir. 1957), affd. sub nom. Bonney v. Commissioner, 247 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1957)); see also sec. 1 165-1(d) (2) (i), Income Tax Regs. This is especially true in a case involving insurance. Section 165(a) prohibits a taxpayer from deducting any amount c…
  20. T.C. Memo. 2005-173 — Transport Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 14, 2005related by meaning
    number of TLC's customers applied the sec. 274(n)(1) limitation to any amounts that they paid to TLC. "Even if we were to allow petitioner to advance petitioner's tax duplication argument, petitioner would not be entitled to the remedy it seeks. If, as petitioner asserts, certain trucking company clients applied the s…