Rev. Proc. 2006-3 — Areas in which rulings will not be issued (domestic areas). This procedure provides a revised list of those provisions of the Code under the jurisdiction of th… IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 3, 2006★ strong match
… of that section, unless the facts and circumstances are materially identical to those set forth in Rev. Rul. 85-19, 1985-1 C.B. 94; Rev. Rul. 79-67, 1979-1 C.B. 128; Rev. Rul. 77-293, 1977-2 C.B. 91; Rev. Rul. 57-387, 1957-2 C.B. 225; Rev. Rul. 56-584, 1956-2 C.B. 179; or Rev. Rul. 56-556, 1956-2 C.B. 177.
(30)
Sectio…
Rev. Proc. 2005-3 — Areas in which rulings will not be issued (domestic areas). This procedure provides a revised list of those provisions of the Code under the jurisdiction of th… IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 3, 2005★ strong match
ion letters, see, respectively, section 8 of Rev. Proc. 2005-4 (this Bulletin) and section 3.02 of Rev. Proc. 2005-6 (this Bulletin).
.02 Changes.
(1) New section 3.01(2) (Section 61—Gross Income Defined) has been added.
(2)
Section 3.01(14) (Section 121—Exclusion of Gain from Sale of Principal Residence) has been modi…
Rev. Rul. 2004-67 — Group or pooled trusts; participation; tax-exempt status, model language. This ruling provides that a governmental section 457(b) plan may invest in a second t… IRCRevenue RulingsJul 12, 2004related by meaning
ue to rely on the previously issued letter ruling regarding its § 457(b) plan without filing another request with the Service for a new letter ruling. An employer described in § 457(e)(1)(A) that satisfies the above requirements and amends the trust of its eligible governmental plan under § 457(b) to include Model Amen…
IRCCourt RulingsSep 30, 1985★ strong match
… employers has nothing to do with the issue before the Court. As in Ridenour, petitioner also cites Rev. Rul. 69-647, 1969-2 C.B. 100, to support his position. In Rev. Rul. 69-647, the Commissioner ruled that an employee who retired from full-time employment but continued to provide advisory opinions on an irregular ba…
Notice 2012-6 — This notice extends and expands the transition relief provided under Rev. Rul. 2011-1, 2011-2 I.R.B. 251, and Rev. Rul. 2008-40, 2008-2 C.B. 166, for certain g… IRCNoticesJan 17, 2012
(24) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) (§ 401(a)(24) plans) to be amended to satisfy the applicable requirements of Rev. Rul. 2011-1.
II. BACKGROUND Rev. Rul. 81-100, 1981-1 C.B. 326, provides that qualified retirement plans and individual retirement accounts are permitted to pool their assets for investment purposes…
Rev. Rul. 2011-1 — This ruling modifies the rules for group trusts described in Rev. Rul. 81-100, 1981-1 C.B. 326, as clarified and modified by Rev. Rul. 2004-67, 2004-2 C.B. 28.… IRCRevenue RulingsModified Jan 10, 2011★ strong match
by reason of section 833(c)(5) of the Code. Rev. Proc. 2008-52 modified. Notice 2010-79 clarified and modified.
Rev. Proc. 2011-12 Rev. Proc. 2011-12 Cost-of-living adjustments for 2011. This procedure sets forth the 2011 cost-of-living adjustments to certain items due to inflation as required under various provisions…
IRCCourt RulingsNov 15, 2004★ strong match
…1-552, 6, 28-29 (1969), 1969-3 C.B. 426, 442-443; also see Staff of the Joint Committee
on Internal Revenue Taxation, General Explanation of the Tax
Reform Act of 1969 (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the TRA
'69 Blue Book) 3, 30-31. The Senate Finance Committee described
its conclusions as follows:
9 Sec. 503 of …
IRCCourt RulingsFeb 9, 2023★ strong match
t ions on allocations of income under section 482 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1954.
The 1969 revision to the Code of Federal Regulations contained regulations promulgated on or before December 31, 1968. See 26 (p art
1 (secs. 1.401-1.500)) C.F.R. v ( 1969). Included in the 1969 revision was
section 1.482-1, which c…
Notice 2014-19 — The purpose of this notice is to provide guidance on the application (including the retroactive application) of the decision in United States v. Windsor, 570 U… IRCNoticesApr 21, 2014★ strong match
…nconstitutional because it violates Fifth Amendment principles. Subsequent to the Windsor decision, Rev. Rul. 2013–17 held the following: (1) For Federal tax purposes, the terms “spouse,” “husband and wife,” “husband,” and “wife” include an individual married to a person of the same sex if the individuals are lawfully …
Rev. Proc. 2025-3 — The revenue procedure updates Rev. Proc. 2024-3, 2024-1 I.R.B.143, to provide a revised list of areas under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Co… IRCRevenue ProceduresDec 30, 2024★ strong match
…g due to resource constraints.
(11) Any frivolous issue, as that term is defined in section 6.10 of Rev. Proc. 2025-1, this Bulletin.
(12) A request that does not comply with the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2025-1, this Bulletin.
SECTION 4. AREAS IN WHICH RULINGS OR DETERMINATION LETTERS WILL NOT ORDINARILY BE ISSUED
.01 …
REG-142695-05 — Proposed regulations under section 125 of the Code provide guidance on cafeteria plans. EE-16-79, EE-130-86, REG-243025-96, and REG-117162-99 withdrawn. Rev. R… IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Sep 24, 2007
…ement are included in the employee’s gross income, even amounts paid to reimburse medical care. See Rev. Rul. 2006-36, 2006-36 I.R.B. 353; Rev. Rul. 2005-24, 2005-1 C.B. 892; Rev. Rul. 2003-102, 2003-2 C.B. 559; Notice 2002-45, 2002-2 C.B. 93; Rev. Rul. 2002-41, 2002-2 C.B. 75; Rev. Rul. 69-141, 1969-1 C.B. 48. New sec…
Rev. Rul. 2014-9 — This revenue ruling provides simplified safe harbor due diligence procedures a plan administrator may use in order to be deemed to have reasonably concluded th… IRCRevenue RulingsApr 21, 2014related by meaning
…the decision in United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. ___, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013), and the holdings of Rev. Rul. 2013–17, 2013–38 I.R.B. 201 (Sept. 16, 2013), to retirement plans qualified under section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). Rev. Rul. 2013–17 is amplified.
IRCCourt RulingsMay 27, 2010
…tar Plan, the applicable Federal rate was 3 .89 percent for a short-term loan compounded annually . Rev . Rul . 2005-66, 2005-2
C .B . 686 . Mid- and long-term rates were higher . Id . In March
2006, when Mogelefsky withdrew from Benistar Plan, the applicable
Federal rate .was 4 .58 percent for a short-term loan compou…
Rev. Rul. 2008-13 — Performance-based compensation. This ruling holds that compensation paid to an executive is not qualified performance-based compensation for purposes of sectio… IRCRevenue RulingsMar 10, 2008★ strong match
…or (1) termination without “cause” or for “good reason” or (2) voluntary retirement.
ADMINISTRATIVE
Rev. Proc. 2008-16 Rev. Proc. 2008-16 Like-kind exchanges of rental property that is used for personal purposes. This procedure provides a safe harbor under which the Service will not challenge whether a property that is…
PLR 202417010 — Qualified Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Stock Bonus Plan IRCPrivate Letter RulingsApr 26, 2024
t cause
Taxpayer to fail to qualify as an 81-100 group trust within the meaning of Rev. Rul.
2011-1.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Rev. Rul. 81-100, as modified,
1 provides that certain retiree benefit plans and other
arrangements are permitted to pool their assets for investment purposes in an “81-100
group trust” if certain speci…
75 FR 65567 — Revised Regulations Concerning Section 403(b) Tax-Sheltered Annuity Contracts; Correction IRCFinal Rules (FR)Oct 26, 2010related by meaning
…e final regulations that are the subject of this correction are under section 403(b)of the Internal Revenue Code.
Need for Correction
As published, final regulations (TD 9340) contain an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the publication of the …
Rev. Proc. 2023-4 — This document updates Rev. Proc. 2022-4, 2022-1 IRB 161, relating to the types of advice the IRS provides to taxpayers on issues under the jurisdiction of the … IRCRevenue ProceduresSuperseded Jan 3, 2023★ strong match
…or Group or Pooled Trust Ruling, demonstrating how the group trust satisfies the criteria listed in Rev. Rul. 2011-1, together with the trust instrument and related documents. Rev. Rul. 2004-67 extends the ability to participate in group trusts to eligible governmental plans under § 457(b) and clarifies the ability of …
IRCCourt RulingsMay 20, 1976
Rev. Rul. 69-421 (Part 2(j)(l)), 1969-2 C.B. 59, 64, sets forth respondent’s position rejecting the prior service of self-employed individuals — partners and sole proprietors — for both prior service benefits and eligibility requirements. He, therefore, concludes that the prior services of a sole proprietor cannot be c…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 26, 1984
…avorable tax treatment than compensation that was paid currently. Thus, under the Tax Reform Act of 1969, capital gains treatment was limited to only that portion of a lump-sum distribution attributable to contributions made before 1970. Thus, Congress itself made the tax treatment dependent upon the time of the contri…
Rev. Rul. 2009-18 — Tax-sheltered annuity contracts. This ruling notes that a number of guidance documents had become outdated due to numerous intervening statutory revisions enac… IRCRevenue RulingsJul 6, 2009related by meaning
…unting or taxable year on behalf of a foreign corporation by its controlling domestic shareholders.
Rev. Proc. 2009-31 Rev. Proc. 2009-31
This procedure provides guidance regarding the granting or revocation of consent to treat intercompany transactions on a separate entity basis under regulations section 1.1502-13(e)(…