IRCCourt RulingsOct 24, 2007
…rrera’s signature. The 1998 return
bears an IRS stamp showing it was received by the IRS on May 30,
2000.
The joint return for taxable year 1999 shows a typed date of
“11-02-00” next to the signature of the paid return preparer.
- 12 -
The 1999 return also shows a typed date of “11-02-00” next to
both petitioner’s and …
IRCCourt RulingsNov 21, 2007
…ng 10 .6 METS .
Subsequently, Mr . Kopty was admitted to the American Hospital in Dubai on March 3, 2000, with the symptoms of a heart
attack . Approximately 2 weeks later he was transported to the
Universite Catholique De Louvain Cliniques Universitaires SaintLuc, a hospital in Belgium, where he underwent coronary byp…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 13, 2010
…Barn
Actors studio during 2001 and 2002 .
Neither petitioner was employed by any third party during
2000, 2001, or 2002 .
Petitioners did not file a timely .tax return for the 2000,
2001, or 2002 tax years .
Mr . O'Boyle paid $10,000 toward his potential Federal income
tax liability for the 2000 tax year . At the time …
IRCCourt RulingsFeb 9, 2023related by meaning
… and June
30, 1979), aff’d , 961 F.2d 1255 (6th Cir. 1992); and Exxon
Cor p. v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1993-616, 66 T.C.M.
(CCH) 1707 (a case involving tax years 1979, 1980, and
1981), aff’d sub nom. Texaco, Inc. v. Commissioner , 98 F.3d
825 (5th Cir. 1996)
In Procter & Gamble Co. v. Commissioner , 95 T.C. 323, 324…
IRCCourt RulingsJan 30, 2007
…Fidelity IRA. Fidelity Institutional issued petitioner
a Form 1099-R with respect to Plan 15106 for 2000 (the Plan 15106 Form 1099-R). The parties stipulated that the Plan 15106 Form
1099-R accurately reflected the offsetting distribution made in
satisfaction of the loan and the direct rollover into the
Fidelity IRA, i…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 14, 2005related by meaning
ll other agreements between the parties. The
parties stipulate that neither of them has made any
representations with respect to the subiect matter of this Agreement or any representations * * * except such
representations as are specifically set forth herein
and each of the parties hereto acknowledges that he or
they …
T.C. Memo. 2007-48 — Diana Van Arsdalen, f.k.a. Diana Murray, Petitioner, and Stanley David Murray, Intervenor v. Commissioner IRCCourt RulingsMar 5, 2007
.
2000-15, sec. 4, 2000-1 C.B. 447, 448-449, that the Commissioner
considers in determining whether to grant equitable relief under
section 6015(f).
4 First, the Commissioner will not grant relief
- 9 -
unless seven threshold conditions have been met: (1) The
taxpayer must have filed joint returns for the taxable years…
IRCCourt RulingsOct 19, 2010related by meaning
… •
warnings that he was in danger of being penalized. For example,
in Mathews v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-84, we told
petitioner:
"Even though the filing of the petition resulted in
respondent's concession of the sec. 72(t) additional tax,
IRCCourt RulingsNov 10, 2004★ strong match
termined that
Mr. and Mrs. Molina properly reported the $19,620 distribution on
- 5 -
their 2000 return and that they had sufficient income and assets to pay their 2000 tax liability in full. Respondent rejected the
OIC, concluding there was no doubt as to liability or
collectibility.
In the petition, under the stateme…
IRCCourt RulingsNov 25, 2009related by meaning
t affect the tax treatment
- 5
under the Internal, Revenue Code . See sec . 7701(j)(5) ("No
provision of law not contained in this title [the internal Revenue Code] shall apply for purposes of determining the
treatment under this title of the Thrift Savings Fund or any
contribution to, or distribution from, such Fund .…
IRCCourt RulingsNov 7, 1996related by meaning
is written, and, even if
petitioner's argument might accord with good policy, we are not
at liberty to rewrite such section because we might deem its effects susceptible of improvement. Commissioner v. Lundy
, 516
U.S.
116 S. Ct. 647, 656-657 (Jan. 17, 1996) (citing
Badaracco v. Commissioner
, 464 U.S. 386, 398 (1984))…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 8, 1996related by meaning
to the Internal Revenue
Code by section 302 of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2, Pub. L.
104-168, authorizes this Court to review the Secretary's failure to abate interest with respect to requests for abatement after
July 30, 1996. Because this case does not involve a request for
abatement after July 30, 1996, we lack jur…
IRCCourt RulingsAug 6, 1991related by meaning
f the matter is that the payment in question should be taxable to petitioner under section 72(e). Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination.6 In order to take into account what appear to be mechanical errors in respondent’s calculations and to afford the parties a further opportunity to resolve the question of…
IRCCourt RulingsJul 5, 2011
…rved as president, secretary, and treasurer of
both corporations during all relevant periods."
"For 2000 and 2001, West Star filed Forms 1120, U.S.
Corporation Income Tax Return, reporting zero gross receipts and
zero deductions for each year. West Star reported assets of
$2,000 cash as of Dec. 31, 2000, and assets of …
IRCCourt RulingsJan 17, 2024related by meaning
Title 26 U.S.C. (Code) , in effect at all relevant times, and Rule references are to
the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure .
Served 01/17/24
2 [* 2 ] deficiencies under section 4973 in th e aggregate amount of
$8,476,705 . The notices also determined additions to tax under section
6651(a)(1) and (2) and accurac…
IRCRegulationsSep 9, 2016
participants who had service only after January 1, 2000, and participants who had service during both of those periods. The suspension of benefits provides for different treatment for different participants and beneficiaries (other than as a result of application of the individual limitations). In addition, the suspens…
Rev. Proc. 2021-30 — Rev. Proc. 2021-30 adds two new benefit overpayment correction methods that encourage employers to avoid seeking recoupment of benefit overpayments made to par… IRCRevenue ProceduresModified Aug 2, 2021
…ecific employee allocation method. Thus, the entire earnings amount for all periods through June 1, 2000 (that is, $750 for March 31, 1998 to December 31, 1998, $575 for 1999, and $759 for January 1, 2000 to June 1, 2000) is allocated to Employee X. Accordingly, Employer L makes a contribution on June 1, 2000 to the pl…
IRCCourt RulingsSep 3, 1998related by meaning
…his Court under substantially identical circumstances. See
Steel Balls, Inc. v. Commissioner
, T.C. Memo. 1995-266, affd.
without published opinion 89 F.3d 841 (8th Cir. 1996).
6
We
rejected the same argument presented herein and concluded that
respondent's position was clearly supported by the statute and
regulations.…
IRCPrivate Letter RulingsMar 3, 2000related by meaning
…C:EBEO:4
TL-N-4712-99
UILC: 419.00-00
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE
MEMORANDUM FOR
FROM: Assistant Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits and Exempt
Organizations) CC: EBEO
SUBJECT:
This Field Service Advice is in res ponse to your memorandum dated October 5,
1999. Field Service Advice is not …
Rev. Proc. 2018-52 — The revenue procedure modifies and supersedes Rev. Proc. 2016–51, 2016–42 I.R.B. 465, which sets forth the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (“EPCRS”… IRCRevenue ProceduresOct 15, 2018
…ecific employee allocation method. Thus, the entire earnings amount for all periods through June 1, 2000 (that is, $750 for March 31, 1998 to December 31, 1998, $575 for 1999, and $759 for January 1, 2000 to June 1, 2000) is allocated to Employee X. Accordingly, Employer L makes a contribution on June 1, 2000 to the pl…