Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 2002-256 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
68 documents · 0.44sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. PLR 200424004 — Year of Deduction
    IRCPrivate Letter RulingsJun 11, 2004
    …'s consent to effect the change and to prevent amounts from being duplicated or omitted. Rev. Proc. 2002-9, 2002-1 C.B. 32, provides the exclusive procedures by which a taxpayer may obtain the automatic consent of the Commissioner to make the changes in method of accounting described in that revenue procedure’s APPENDI…
  2. T.C. Memo. 2005-173 — Transport Labor Contract/Leasing, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 14, 2005related by meaning
    ll other agreements between the parties. The parties stipulate that neither of them has made any representations with respect to the subiect matter of this Agreement or any representations * * * except such representations as are specifically set forth herein and each of the parties hereto acknowledges that he or they …
  3. T.C. Memo. 2007-292 — Hubert Joubert v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsSep 24, 2007★ strong match
    him . On May 24, 2002, SBC Communications, Inc ., issued a check to petitioner in the amount of $131,317 .46 . The gross amount of the check had been $168,355 .71 . However, $33,671 .14 in Federal income tax and $3,367 .11 in California State income tax had been withheld . During 2002, petitioner also received $9,552 …
  4. T.C. Memo. 2011-105 — Mark E. Warmoth v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 19, 2011
    … employees in 2000-2003. Leading Edge did not provide health insurance benefits to its employees in 2002-04. Leading Edge maintained a portfolio account with Advest, Inc. From August 2003 through December 2004 Leading Edge - 20 - maintained a portfolio of stocks and received dividends." Leading Edge also maintained che…
  5. T.C. Memo. 2024-71 — Kenneth Steven Tuma, Sr. & Deborah Ann Tuma v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 11, 2024related by meaning
    …ation software is only as good as the information one puts into it.”). 21 [* 21] Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-140 , 71 T.C.M. (CCH) 2526 , 2526 (“ [The tax p ayers] argue that benefits received from the [RRB] are not taxable. This , however , is simply not the case.”). VIII. Conclusion Petitioners received railroad re…
  6. T.C. Memo. 2001-55 — Taylor Miller v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 6, 2001★ strong match
    the no change letter should stand. The first ground was that there was no justifiable basis for reopening the case under Rev. Proc. 94-68, 1994-2 C.B. 803, and section 4023 of the Internal Revenue Manual (the Manual), which in his view were binding on the Internal Revenue Service. The second ground was that respondent …
  7. REG-142695-05 — Proposed regulations under section 125 of the Code provide guidance on cafeteria plans. EE-16-79, EE-130-86, REG-243025-96, and REG-117162-99 withdrawn. Rev. R…
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Sep 24, 2007
    …2006-36 I.R.B. 353; Rev. Rul. 2005-24, 2005-1 C.B. 892; Rev. Rul. 2003-102, 2003-2 C.B. 559; Notice 2002-45, 2002-2 C.B. 93; Rev. Rul. 2002-41, 2002-2 C.B. 75; Rev. Rul. 69-141, 1969-1 C.B. 48. New section 106(e) provides that a health FSA will not fail to satisfy the requirements of sections 105 or 106 merely because …
  8. T.C. Memo. 2014-14 — Ries Enterprises, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 27, 2014
    … 20%. Mr. Ries, a disqualified person, is therefore treated as owning all of petitioner's stock for 2002. See secs. 409(p)(3), -14- [*14] 318(a)(1)(A); sec. 1.409(p)-1(e)(2), Income Tax Regs. Accordingly, 2002 is a nonallocation year. See sec. 409(p)(3). D. The Plan Violated Section 409(p) for 2002. The Plan made an im…
  9. T.C. Memo. 2010-149 — Harold X. O'Boyle v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 13, 2010
    …member . Ms . O'Boyle received nonemployee compensation from Red Barn Actors studio during 2001 and 2002 . Neither petitioner was employed by any third party during 2000, 2001, or 2002 . Petitioners did not file a timely .tax return for the 2000, 2001, or 2002 tax years . Mr . O'Boyle paid $10,000 toward his potential …
  10. T.C. Memo. 2017-112 — Whistleblower 19860-15W v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 13, 2017★ strong match
    that petitioner had provided to CID in the 2002 letters. Petitioner attached copies of the 2002 letters to the 2002 Form 211. On February 3, 2003, he received a letter from the IRS Midstates Region office in Memphis, Tennessee, verifying that the 2002 Form 211 had been received and was being evaluated. 2004 In October…
  11. T.C. Memo. 2008-17 — Herbert & Christine Bangs v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 31, 2008
    …. Commissioner , 93 T .C . 181, 195 (1989) . The record establishes, and we have found, that during 2002 Mr . Bangs paid to Ms . Platt $8,803 .87 pursuant to the divorce decree provision in question . Date of Payment Amount . of Paymen t 01/14/2002 728 .9 1 02/13/2002 728 .9 1 03/13/2002 728 .9 1 04/15/2002 728 .9 1 05…
  12. T.C. Memo. 2009-272 — Carolyn D. Hemrick v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 25, 2009related by meaning
    t affect the tax treatment - 5 under the Internal, Revenue Code . See sec . 7701(j)(5) ("No provision of law not contained in this title [the internal Revenue Code] shall apply for purposes of determining the treatment under this title of the Thrift Savings Fund or any contribution to, or distribution from, such Fund .…
  13. T.C. Memo. 1996-365 — Timothy W. & Suzanne M. Coffield v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 8, 1996related by meaning
    to the Internal Revenue Code by section 302 of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2, Pub. L. 104-168, authorizes this Court to review the Secretary's failure to abate interest with respect to requests for abatement after July 30, 1996. Because this case does not involve a request for abatement after July 30, 1996, we lack jur…
  14. T.C. Memo. 1996-502 — Elaine S. Bennett v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 7, 1996related by meaning
    is written, and, even if petitioner's argument might accord with good policy, we are not at liberty to rewrite such section because we might deem its effects susceptible of improvement. Commissioner v. Lundy , 516 U.S. 116 S. Ct. 647, 656-657 (Jan. 17, 1996) (citing Badaracco v. Commissioner , 464 U.S. 386, 398 (1984))…
  15. T.C. Memo. 2011-92 — Kathleen Susan Stipe v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsApr 25, 2011related by meaning
    …not necessarily disabled within the meaning of I section 72(m) (7). See Kopty v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo; 2007-343 (taxpayer who received long-term disability benefits from the U.S. Social Security Administration nct disabled within the' meaning of section 72(m) (7)), affd. 313 Fed. Appx. 333 (D.C. Cir. 2009); see also…
  16. Treas. Reg. § 54.4980B-2(f) — Plans that must comply.
    IRCRegulationsDec 30, 2016
    …e for the year. Thus, the second condition in paragraph (c) of this Q&A-8 is also satisfied for the 2002 plan year. Because both conditions in paragraph (c) of this Q&A-8 are satisfied for 2002, with respect to any qualifying event occurring in 2002, the health FSA is not obligated to make COBRA continuation coverage a…
  17. T.C. Memo. 2010-226 — Harry Eugene Mathews v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsOct 19, 2010related by meaning
    … • warnings that he was in danger of being penalized. For example, in Mathews v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-84, we told petitioner: "Even though the filing of the petition resulted in respondent's concession of the sec. 72(t) additional tax,
  18. Notice 2004-34 — Minimum funding standards; interest rates; section 101 of Pension Funding Equity Act. This notice describes the method for determining the permissible range of…
    IRCNoticesMay 3, 2004
    ….39 6.65 7.39 2001 October 7.37 6.64 7.37 2001 November 7.36 6.62 7.36 2001 December 7.34 6.61 7.34 2002 January 7.34 6.60 7.34 2002 February 7.33 6.60 7.33 2002 March 7.32 6.59 7.32 2002 April 7.32 6.58 7.32 2002 May 7.31 6.58 7.31 2002 June 7.30 6.57 7.30 2002 July 7.28 6.55 7.28 2002 August 7.26 6.53 7.26 2002 Septe…
  19. T.C. Memo. 2014-106 — Whistleblower 10949-13W v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJun 4, 2014related by meaning
    hey would establish that respondent proceeded against the targets using information the whistleblower provided after December 20, 2006. If these facts are established, the whistleblower is entitled to judicial review of respondent's award determination. We hold, consistent with the rationale of Dacosta, that this Court…
  20. Rev. Proc. 2006-3 — Areas in which rulings will not be issued (domestic areas). This procedure provides a revised list of those provisions of the Code under the jurisdiction of th…
    IRCRevenue ProceduresJan 3, 2006
    …ed an automatic change procedure for obtaining a change in annual accounting period. See Rev. Proc. 2002-39, 2002-1 C.B. 1046 (general procedures for prior approval), as clarified and modified by Notice 2002-72, 2002-2 C.B. 843, and modified by Rev. Proc. 2003-34, 2003-1 C.B. 856, and Rev. Proc. 2003-79, 2003-2 C.B. 10…