Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Go to T.C. Memo. 2015-56 (not yet in the library — opens the official source)
80 documents · 0.29sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. 79 FR 8544 — Shared Responsibility for Employers Regarding Health Coverage
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Feb 12, 2014
    …00 is less than 9.5 percent of Employee E's assumed monthly income for each calendar month from May 2015 through December 2015, the coverage offered is treated as affordable with respect to Employee E for May 2015 through December 2015 ($100 is 7.69 percent of $1,300). Example 6 (Federal poverty line safe harbor). (i) …
  2. T.C. Memo. 2024-71 — Kenneth Steven Tuma, Sr. & Deborah Ann Tuma v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 11, 2024★ strong match
    …efits petitioners received from the RRB are includ i ble in their gross income as determined in the 2015 and the 2016 NODs . We have considered all of the parties’ arguments and , to the extent they are not discussed herein , find them to be irrelevant , moot , or without merit. To address respondent’s concessions and …
  3. Treas. Reg. § 54.4980H-5(e)(2)(v) — Assessable payments under section 4980H(b).
    IRCRegulationsDec 30, 2016
    …per month) to the employee contribution ($100 per calendar month). For the calendar months November 2015 through December 2015, Employer V may assume that Employee E earned $1,300 per calendar month (130 hours of service multiplied by $10 (which is the lower of the employee's hourly rate of pay at the beginning of the …
  4. T.C. Memo. 2001-55 — Taylor Miller v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 6, 2001★ strong match
    …nge of the position evidenced by the no change letter. In response to petitioner’s counsel’s second memo of January 16, 1997, arguing that neither of those criteria had been satisfied and that petitioner had not been notified of the need for a second examination, respondent’s Chief, Examination Division, on June 16, 19…
  5. Notice 2015-71 — This notice sets forth updates on the corporate bond monthly yield curve, the corresponding spot segment rates for October 2015 used under § 417(e)(3)(D), the …
    IRCNoticesOct 26, 2015
    40 I.R.B. 294, Notice 2014–50, 2014–40 I.R.B. 590, and Notice 2015–61, 2015–39 I.R.B. 408, respectively. 24-MONTH AVERAGE CORPORATE BOND SEGMENT RATES The three 24-month average corporate bond segment rates applicable for October 2015 without adjustment for the 25-year average segment rate limits are as follows: Applic…
  6. Notice 2015-80 — This notice sets forth updates on the corporate bond monthly yield curve, the corresponding spot segment rates for November 2015 used under § 417(e)(3)(D), the…
    IRCNoticesNov 30, 2015
    40 I.R.B. 294, Notice 2014–50, 2014–40 I.R.B. 590, and Notice 2015–61, 2015–39 I.R.B. 408, respectively. 24-MONTH AVERAGE CORPORATE BOND SEGMENT RATES The three 24-month average corporate bond segment rates applicable for November 2015 without adjustment for the 25-year average segment rate limits are as follows: Appli…
  7. Notice 2015-85 — This notice sets forth updates on the corporate bond monthly yield curve, the corresponding spot segment rates for December 2015 used under § 417(e)(3)(D), the…
    IRCNoticesDec 28, 2015
    40 I.R.B. 294, Notice 2014–50, 2014–40 I.R.B. 590, and Notice 2015–61, 2015–39 I.R.B. 408, respectively. 24-MONTH AVERAGE CORPORATE BOND SEGMENT RATES The three 24-month average corporate bond segment rates applicable for December 2015 without adjustment for the 25-year average segment rate limits are as follows: Appli…
  8. T.C. Memo. 2017-3 — Candace Elaine v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJan 3, 2017related by meaning
    SR T.C. Memo. 2017-3 UNITED STATES TAX COURT CANDACE ELAINE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 5023-14. Filed January 3, 2017. Candace Elaine, pro se. Willis B. Douglass and Mindy S. Meigs, for respondent. MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION ASHFORD, Judge: Respondent determined …
  9. 78 FR 218 — Shared Responsibility for Employers Regarding Health Coverage
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 2, 2013
    erage offered is treated as affordable with respect to Employee D for 2015 ($85 is 9.01% of $942.50). Example 5. (Rate of pay safe harbor). (i) Facts. Employee E is employed by applicable large employer member V from May 15, 2015 through December 31, 2015. In addition, V offers Employee E and her dependents minimum ess…
  10. Treas. Reg. § 54.4980H-3(d)(6)(vii) — Determining full-time employees.
    IRCRegulationsDec 30, 2016
    …l is generally not in session. Employee B resumes providing services for Employer Y on September 7, 2015, when the new school year begins. (ii) Conclusion. Because the period from May 24, 2015 through September 5, 2015 (a total of 15 weeks), during which Employee B is not credited with an hour of service does not excee…
  11. T.C. Memo. 2015-61 — Kevin R. Gurule & Dawn M. Gurule v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 31, 2015related by meaning
    …d and balanced decision, the Court will not reweigh the equities. Id.; Lipson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-252, at *9 (citing Fib Below Sales & Mktg., Inc. v. United States, 497 F.3d 828, 830 (8th Cir. 2007)). IRM pt. 5.14.1.4(4) (June 1, 2010) states: "Installment agreements must reflect taxpayers' ability to pay …
  12. 81 FR 38020 — Expatriate Health Plans, Expatriate Health Plan Issuers, and Qualified Expatriates; Excepted Benefits; Lifetime and Annual Limits; and Short-Term, Limited-Dura…
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jun 10, 2016
    …he requirements of the EHCCA apply to expatriate health plans issued or renewed on or after July 1, 2015. IRS Notice 2015-43 On July 20, 2015, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued Notice 2015-43 (2015-29 IRB 73) to provide interim guidance on the implementation of the EHCCA and the application of certain provisio…
  13. T.C. Memo. 1996-502 — Elaine S. Bennett v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 7, 1996related by meaning
    is written, and, even if petitioner's argument might accord with good policy, we are not at liberty to rewrite such section because we might deem its effects susceptible of improvement. Commissioner v. Lundy , 516 U.S. 116 S. Ct. 647, 656-657 (Jan. 17, 1996) (citing Badaracco v. Commissioner , 464 U.S. 386, 398 (1984))…
  14. 79 FR 13547 — Premium Rates; Payment of Premiums; Reducing Regulatory Burden
    PBGCFinal Rules (FR)Mar 11, 2014
    …plans more time to adjust to the new provisions, the due dates will not be completely uniform until 2015. The following table shows how due dates differ under the previous and the new due date rules for calendar-year plans for 2014 (the transition year) and 2015 (the year full uniformity is achieved). Plan size 2014 20…
  15. T.C. Memo. 2009-272 — Carolyn D. Hemrick v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 25, 2009related by meaning
    t affect the tax treatment - 5 under the Internal, Revenue Code . See sec . 7701(j)(5) ("No provision of law not contained in this title [the internal Revenue Code] shall apply for purposes of determining the treatment under this title of the Thrift Savings Fund or any contribution to, or distribution from, such Fund .…
  16. T.C. Memo. 2019-1 — Robert Wesley v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMar 14, 2019related by meaning
    …ce. See, e.g., Katz v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 329, 337-338 (2000); Williamson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2009-188, 98 T.C.M. (CCH) 110, 112; Stockton v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2009-186, 98 T.C.M. (CCH) 103, 106. Indeed, the regulations explicitly provide a taxpayer will not be granted a face-toface hearing when his …
  17. 145 T.C. No. 1 — John A. Tomassetti & Cathy C. Tomassetti v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsJul 13, 2015related by meaning
    cipates in a reportable transaction and to each amended return that reflects that participation and send a copy of the disclosure statement to the IRS Office of Tax Shelter Analysis). Petitioners do not argue in their brief that the amended return was a "qualified amended return" within the meaning of sec. 1.6664-2(c)(…
  18. 84 FR 213 — Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Annual Adjustments for 2019
    ERISAFinal Rules (FR)Jan 23, 2019
    … Program Violations occurring Penalty assessed Which penalty level applies On or before November 2, 2015 On or before August 1, 2016 Pre-August 1, 2016 levels. On or before November 2, 2015 After August 1, 2016 Pre-August 1, 2016 levels. After November 2, 2015 After August 1, 2016, but on or before March 17, 2017 Augus…
  19. 97 T.C. 237; 97 T.C. No. 14 — Guilzon v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsAug 6, 1991related by meaning
    f the matter is that the payment in question should be taxable to petitioner under section 72(e). Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination.6 In order to take into account what appear to be mechanical errors in respondent’s calculations and to afford the parties a further opportunity to resolve the question of…
  20. Notice 2015-39 — This notice sets forth updates on the corporate bond monthly yield curve, the corresponding spot segment rates for May 2015 used under § 417(e)(3)(D), the 24-m…
    IRCNoticesJun 1, 2015
    INCOME TAX Rev. Rul. 2015–14 Rev. Rul. 2015–14 Federal rates; adjusted federal rates; adjusted federal long-term rate and the long-term exempt rate. For purposes of sections 382, 642, 1274, 1288, and other sections of the Code, tables set forth the rates for June 2015. Announcement 2015–15 Announcement 2015–15 The Offi…