Brief Case

Search the Pension Law Library

Limit to:Advanced options
Searches the code/regs in effect on that date.
Words mode supports "quoted phrases", +required and -excluded terms.
Document types:
Key provisions: I.R.C. § 416
50 documents · 1.18sAllIRCERISAPBGCJoint Board
  1. Treas. Reg. § 1.416-1(e) — Questions and answers on top-heavy plans.
    IRCRegulationsMar 14, 2019related by meaning
    …nce the defined benefit minimums are generally more valuable, if each employee covered under both a top-heavy defined benefit plan and a top-heavy defined contribution plan receives the defined benefit minimum, the defined benefit and defined contribution minimums will be satisfied. Another approach that may be used is…
  2. Treas. Reg. § 1.430(a)-1(g) — Determination of minimum required contribution.
    IRCRegulationsSep 9, 2016related by meaning
    …e 9), the shortfall amortization bases established before the 2016 plan year are retained.(vii) The minimum required contribution for 2016 is the sum of the target normal cost and the shortfall amortization installments, or $50,000 ($20,000 + $30,000). Because this is larger than the funding standard account carryover …
  3. T.D. 9732 — These final regulations provide guidance on the determination of minimum required contributions for single-employer defined benefit pension plans and also cont…
    IRCTreasury DecisionsSep 28, 2015related by meaning
    t the minimum required contribution, then it is possible that the minimum required contribution would be reduced by even more than the amount so used. Another case raised by commenters – with results that are not only anomalous but also potentially circular — is a situation in which a plan has a funding standard carryo…
  4. T.D. 9958 — This document sets forth temporary regulations implementing certain transparency requirements under section 204 of Division BB of Title II of the Consolidated …
    IRCTreasury DecisionsDec 6, 2021
    …p pharmaceutical products by name and ingredient because this approach will produce more meaningful top 50 and top 25 lists of prescription drugs. If products are not grouped according to name and ingredient, the same drug could occupy several spots on the top 50 or top 25 lists. For example, providers may prescribe a …
  5. 80 FR 54374 — Determination of Minimum Required Pension Contributions
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Sep 9, 2015related by meaning
    t some of the prefunding balance would be needed to fully offset that minimum required contribution, and the first calculation would once again apply. After consideration of these comments, the IRS and the Treasury Department have concluded that the statutory provisions require this result in these limited factual situ…
  6. 143 T.C. No. 21 — Key Lime Investments, Inc. v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 26, 2014
    …ibuted amount on its return. During those years Mr. and Mrs. Waage were the only plan participants. Key Lime Investments, Inc., is a Nevada corporation organized in December 2001. Ms. Waage is the president, secretary, and chief financial officer, and Mr. Waage is the vice president. Key Lime licensed intellectual prop…
  7. REG-142695-05 — Proposed regulations under section 125 of the Code provide guidance on cafeteria plans. EE-16-79, EE-130-86, REG-243025-96, and REG-117162-99 withdrawn. Rev. R…
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Sep 24, 2007
    … A cafeteria plan that provides health benefits is not treated as discriminatory as to benefits and contributions if:
  8. 86 FR 66662 — Prescription Drug and Health Care Spending
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Nov 23, 2021
    which are used to rank the top 50 and top 25 lists, are likely to be different for drugs covered under the pharmacy benefit and ( printed page 66675) for drugs covered under the hospital or medical benefit. Consequently, combining drugs covered under the pharmacy benefit with the hospital or medical benefit could lead…
  9. Notice 2007-84 — Post-retirement medical and life insurance benefits; nondiscrimination; welfare benefit funds. This notice alerts taxpayers that the tax treatment of trusts pr…
    IRCNoticesNov 5, 2007
    …yee is $50,000 of coverage. Moreover, in the case of post-retirement benefits for or on behalf of a key employee (as defined in § 416(i)(1)), § 419A(d) requires that a separate account be established for any medical or life insurance benefits provided with respect to the key employee, and any medical or life insurance …
  10. Treas. Reg. § 1.430(f)-1(g) — Effect of prefunding balance and funding standard carryover balance.
    IRCRegulationsSep 9, 2016related by meaning
    …ntribution of $85,000 plus the $15,000 of the funding standard carryover balance used to offset the minimum required contribution equals the minimum required contribution for the 2010 plan year of $100,000. Therefore, no excess contributions are available to increase the prefunding balance, and the prefunding balance a…
  11. T.C. Memo. 1998-407 — Stephen Neal Swihart v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsNov 13, 1998
    …ngton, when the petition in this case was filed. Throughout the year in issue petitioner worked for Key Trucking, Inc. (Key), as a salesman. At the beginning of 1994 petitioner was paid a salary by Key. In late January or early February, Key ceased paying petitioner a salary, and, instead, - 3 - paid him commissions on…
  12. 82 FR 7336 — Proposed Best Interest Contract Exemption for Insurance Intermediaries
    ERISAProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Jan 19, 2017
    …ndicated they are at the highest level of an insurance company's distribution hierarchy, or at the “top-tier” or “top-level.” As top-level IMOs, most applicants represented that they oversee independent, insurance-only agents or sub-IMOs (which in turn oversee independent insurance-only agents), or both. This oversight…
  13. REG-113891-07 — Part IV. Items of General Interest
    IRCProposed Rules (FR)Proposed Oct 15, 2007related by meaning
    mount used to offset the 2008 minimum required contribution, adjusted for investment experience during the 2008 year ($25,000 less $15,000 plus $200). Example 4. (i) The facts are the same as in Example 3 except that Sponsor S contributes $90,000 (instead of $85,000) to Plan P on January 1, 2008, for the 2008 plan year…
  14. Treas. Reg. § 1.430(j)-1(f) — Payment of minimum required contributions.
    IRCRegulationsSep 9, 2016related by meaning
    …icated, these examples are based on the following assumptions: section 430 applies to determine the minimum required contribution for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2008; the plan year is the calendar year; the valuation date is January 1; the plan sponsor is required to pay the installments described in p…
  15. Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(4)-2(b)(4)(vi)(D) — Nondiscrimination in amount of employer contributions under a defined contribution plan.
    IRCRegulationsMay 18, 2016related by meaning
    s a result of receiving allocations under the top-heavy formula were treated as not currently benefiting under the plan. For purposes of this paragraph (b)(4)(vi)(D)(3), a top-heavy formula is a formula that provides the minimum benefit described in section 416(c)(2) (taking into account, if applicable, the modificatio…
  16. Treas. Reg. § 1.414(q)-1T(c) — Highly compensated employee (temporary).
    IRCRegulationsSep 9, 2016
    (c) (c) Identification of top-paid group members. With the exception of the paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this A-9 exclusion for certain employees covered by collective bargaining agreements, the exclusions in paragraph (b)(1) of this A-9 are not applicable for purposes of identifying the particular employees in the top-pai…
  17. ERISA § 303(f)(6)(B)(iii) (29 U.S.C. § 1083) — Minimum funding standards for single-employer defined benefit pension plans
    ERISACode / StatuteJan 6, 2025related by meaning
    …n year after 2008, the amount of such balance credited under paragraph (2) (if any) in reducing the minimum required contribution of the plan for the preceding plan year, and (f)(6)(C)(ii) (ii) as of the time specified in paragraph (5)(A), any reduction in such balance elected under paragraph (5). (f)(7) (7) Funding st…
  18. T.C. Memo. 2011-105 — Mark E. Warmoth v. Commissioner
    IRCCourt RulingsMay 19, 2011
    …which Mr. Warmoth had worked before starting Weekend Warrior. The bonus plan was.not limited to the top managers but rather was for key employees. , Under the bonus plan, one-third of Weekend Warrior's profits became a key employee pool. One-half of the key employee pool was split among the top managers and Mr. Warmoth…
  19. Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(f)(2)(iv) — Organizations organized and operated for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational purposes, or for the prevention…
    IRCRegulationsJun 30, 2017
    tion it serves into account, the IRS concluded that the Top Executives' compensation packages for Year 1 were excessive. As a result of the examination, O's board added new members to the compensation committee who have expertise in compensation matters and also amended its written procedures to require the compensatio…
  20. 88 FR 88494 — Federal Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) Process Administrative Fee and Certified IDR Entity Fee Ranges
    IRCFinal Rules (FR)Dec 21, 2023
    …eport on the Federal Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) Process, October 1-December 31, 2022, the top 10 initiating parties (or entities acting on behalf of initiating parties) are large companies that initiate approximately 85 percent of disputes, and the top 10 non-initiating parties are large companies that are in…