Brief Case
Pension Resource

Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(4)-10

Testing of former employees.
CFR 2005 annual edition (revised as of 2005-04-01) · superseded Apr 1, 2006 · last amended by T.D. 8485, 58 FR 46812, Sept. 3, 1993
PrintCompare datesAsk AI about this sectionOfficial source ↗
Back to current
The earliest stored text of this section is effective Apr 1, 1997. Showing that version.
(a) Introduction. This section provides rules for determining whether a plan satisfies the nondiscriminatory amount and nondiscriminatory availability requirements of § 1.401(a)(4)-1(b)(2) and (3), respectively, with respect to former employees. Generally, this section is relevant only in the case of benefits provided through an amendment to the plan effective in the current plan year. See the definitions of employee and former employee in § 1.401(a)(4)-12.
(b) Nondiscrimination in amount of contributions or benefits—(1) General rule. A plan satisfies § 1.401(a)(4)-1(b)(2) with respect to the amount of contributions or benefits provided to former employees if, under all of the relevant facts and circumstances, the amount of contributions or benefits provided to former employees does not discriminate significantly in favor of former HCEs. For this purpose, contributions or benefits provided to former employees includes all contributions or benefits provided to former employees or, at the employer's option, only those contributions or benefits arising out of the amendment providing the contributions or benefits. A plan under which no former employee currently benefits (within the meaning of § 1.410(b)-3(b)) is deemed to satisfy this paragraph (b).
(2) Permitted disparity. Section 401(l) and § 1.401(a)(4)-7 generally apply to benefits provided to former employees in the same manner as those provisions apply to employees. Thus, for example, for purposes of determining a former employee's cumulative permitted disparity limit, the sum of the former employee's total annual disparity fractions (within the meaning of § 1.401(l)-5) as an employee continues to be taken into account. However, the permitted disparity rate applicable to a former employee is determined under § 1.401(l)-3(e) as of the age the former employee commenced receipt of benefits, not as of the date the employee receives the accrual for the current plan year.
(3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in this paragraph (b):

Example 1.

Employer X maintains a section 401(l) plan, Plan A, that uses maximum permitted disparity. Plan A is amended to increase the benefits of all former employees in pay status. The percentage increase for each former employee is reasonably comparable to the adjustment in social security benefits under section 215(i)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act since the former employee commenced receipt of benefits. Plan A does not fail to satisfy this paragraph (b) merely because of the amendment.

Example 2.

The facts are the same as in Example 1, except that the amendment provides an across-the-board 20 percent increase in benefits for all former employees in pay status. The cost of living has increased at an average rate of three percent in the two years preceding the amendment, and some HCEs have retired and become former HCEs during that period. Because this amendment increases the disparity in the plan formula beyond the maximum permitted disparity adjusted for any reasonable approximation of the increase in the cost of living since the HCEs retired, Plan A discriminates significantly in favor of former HCEs, and thus does not satisfy this paragraph (b).

Example 3.

The facts are the same as in Example 1, except that Plan A is only amended to increase the benefits of former employees in pay status who terminated employment with Employer X after attaining early retirement age. The determination of whether the amendment causes Plan A to fail to satisfy this paragraph (b) must take into account the relative numbers of former HCEs and former NHCEs who have terminated employment with Employer X after attaining early retirement age.

(c) Nondiscrimination in availability of benefits, rights, or features. A plan satisfies section 401(a)(4) with respect to the availability of benefits, rights, and features provided to former employees if any change in the availability of any benefit, right, or feature to any former employee is applied in a manner that, under all of the relevant facts and circumstances, does not discriminate significantly in favor of former HCEs. For purposes of demonstrating that a plan satisfies section 401(a)(4) with respect to the availability of loans provided to former employees, an employer may treat former employees who are parties in interest within the meaning of section 3(14) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 as employees.
Source credit, amendments & notes

[T.D. 8485, 58 FR 46812, Sept. 3, 1993]

Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(4)-10 — Testing of former employees. · CFR 2005 annual edition (revised as of 2005-04-01) · https://pensionresource.website/EAMain?content=EAMain.Law&id=cfr26-1.401%28a%29%284%29-10&asof=1978-02-22 · printed Oct 16, 2026
On this page
  • (a) Introduction.
  • (b) (b) Nondiscrimination in amount of contributions or benefit…
  • (c) Nondiscrimination in availability of benefits, rights, or f…
Implements
I.R.C. § 401 Qualified pension, profit-sharing, and stock bonus plans
Cited by (code & regs)

No guidance in the library cites this section yet.

No court rulings in the library cite this provision yet.

No private letter rulings in the library cite this provision yet.

Each row is a version of the text as published by the official source. Code dates are the edition/release point that first reflected the change; regulation dates are eCFR effective dates. The library checks the official sources automatically, so new versions appear here on their own; “run” opens the sync that recorded a version.

EffectiveThroughSourceAmended by
Apr 1, 1997Mar 31, 2006CFR 2005 annual edition (revised as of 2005-04-01) run 127T.D. 8485, 58 FR 46812, Sept. 3, 1993View
Apr 1, 2006currenteCFR editorial change effective 2016-05-18 run 2T.D. 8485, 58 FR 46812, Sept. 3, 1993View · Redline (sign in)
Provision-level history (blame)