Brief Case

Circular 230 § 10.81

Petition for reinstatement.
CFR 2001 annual edition (revised as of 2001-07-01) · superseded Jul 1, 2003
Back to current
Historical text in effect Jul 1, 1997 through Jun 30, 2003. View current · Compare with current
(a) Filing. The respondent's answer shall be filed in writing within the time specified in the complaint or notice of institution of the proceeding, unless on application the time is extended by the Director of Practice or the Administrative Law Judge. The answer shall be filed in duplicate with the Director of Practice.
(b) Contents. The answer shall contain a statement of facts that constitute the grounds of defense, and it shall specifically admit or deny each allegation set forth in the complaint, except that the respondent shall not deny a material allegation in the complaint that he/she knows to be true, or state that he/she is without sufficient information to form a belief when in fact he/she possesses such information.
(c) Failure to deny or answer allegations in the complaint. Every allegation in the complaint which is not denied in the answer shall be deemed to be admitted and may be considered as proved, and no further evidence in respect of such allegation need be adduced at a hearing. Failure to file an answer within the time prescribed in the notice to the respondent, except as the time for answer is extended by the Director of Practice or the Administrative Law Judge, shall constitute an admission of the allegations of the complaint and a waiver of hearing, and the Administrative Law Judge may make his/her decision by default without a hearing or further procedure.
Circular 230 § 10.81 — Petition for reinstatement. · CFR 2001 annual edition (revised as of 2001-07-01) · https://pensionresource.website/EAMain?content=EAMain.Law&id=cfr31-10.81&asof=1997-07-01 · printed Oct 16, 2026
On this page
  • (a) Filing.
  • (b) Contents.
  • (c) Failure to deny or answer allegations in the complaint.
Cited by (code & regs)

No guidance in the library cites this section yet.

No court rulings in the library cite this provision yet.

No private letter rulings in the library cite this provision yet.

Each row is a version of the text as published by the official source. Code dates are the edition/release point that first reflected the change; regulation dates are eCFR effective dates. The library checks the official sources automatically, so new versions appear here on their own; “run” opens the sync that recorded a version.

EffectiveThroughSourceAmended by
Jul 1, 1997Jun 30, 2003CFR 2001 annual edition (revised as of 2001-07-01) run 127View
Jul 1, 2003Jun 30, 2008CFR 2007 annual edition (revised as of 2007-07-01) run 127View · Redline (sign in)
Jul 1, 2008Jun 30, 2011CFR 2010 annual edition (revised as of 2010-07-01) run 127View · Redline (sign in)
Jul 1, 2011Jun 30, 2012CFR 2011 annual edition (revised as of 2011-07-01) run 127View · Redline (sign in)
Jul 1, 2012Jun 30, 2014CFR 2013 annual edition (revised as of 2013-07-01) run 127T.D. 9527, 76 FR 32311, June 3, 2011View · Redline (sign in)
Jul 1, 2014currenteCFR amendment effective 2016-12-30 run 5T.D. 9668, 79 FR 33694, June 12, 2014View · Redline (sign in)
Provision-level history (blame)