Brief Case

Treas. Reg. § 1.401-7

Forfeitures under a qualified pension plan.
eCFR editorial change effective 2016-05-18 · current · last amended by T.D. 6675, 28 FR 10121, Sept. 17, 1963
Back to current
(a) General rules. In the case of a trust forming a part of a qualified pension plan, the plan must expressly provide that forfeitures arising from severance of employment, death, or for any other reason, must not be applied to increase the benefits any employee would otherwise receive under the plan at any time prior to the termination of the plan or the complete discontinuance of employer contributions thereunder. The amounts so forfeited must be used as soon as possible to reduce the employer's contributions under the plan. However, a qualified pension plan may anticipate the effect of forfeitures in determining the costs under the plan. Furthermore, a qualified plan will not be disqualified merely because a determination of the amount of forfeitures under the plan is made only once during each taxable year of the employer.
(b) Examples. The rules of paragraph (a) of this section may be illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1.

The B Company Pension Trust forms a part of a pension plan which is funded by individual level annual premium annuity contracts. The plan requires ten years of service prior to obtaining a vested right to benefits under the plan. One of the company's employees resigns his position after two years of service. The insurance company paid to the trustees the cash surrender value of the contract—$750. The B Company must reduce its next contribution to the pension trust by this amount.

Example 2.

The C Corporation's trusteed pension plan has been in existence for 20 years. It is funded by individual contracts issued by an insurance company, and the premiums thereunder are paid annually. Under such plan, the annual premium accrued for the year 1966 is due and is paid on January 2, 1966, and on July 1 of the same year the plan is terminated due to the liquidation of the employer. Some forfeitures were incurred and collected by the trustee with respect to those participants whose employment terminated between January 2 and July 1. The plan provides that the amount of such forfeitures is to be applied to provide additional annuity benefits for the remaining employees covered by the plan. The pension plan of the C Corporation satisfies the provisions of section 401(a)(8). Although forfeitures are used to increase benefits in this case, this use of forfeitures is permissible since no further contributions will be made under the plan.

(c) Effective date. This section applies to taxable years of a qualified plan commencing after September 30, 1963. However, a plan which is qualified on September 30, 1963, will not be disqualified merely because it does not expressly include the provisions prescribed by this section.
Source credit, amendments & notes

[T.D. 6675, 28 FR 10121, Sept. 17, 1963]

Treas. Reg. § 1.401-7 — Forfeitures under a qualified pension plan. · eCFR editorial change effective 2016-05-18 · https://pensionresource.website/EAMain?content=EAMain.Law&id=cfr26-1.401-7&asof=2001-05-14 · printed Oct 16, 2026
On this page
  • (a) General rules.
  • (b) Examples.
  • (c) Effective date.
Implements
I.R.C. § 401 Qualified pension, profit-sharing, and stock bonus plans
Cited by (code & regs)
Guidance addressing this section
IRS / Treasury
Proposed Rules
  • 88 FR 12282Proposed Feb 27, 2023 — Use of Forfeitures in Qualified Retirement Plans Comments due May 30, 2023 (a)
Tax Court (1) · DOL/Federal (0)
U.S. Tax Court (1)
Also cite this provision (1)

No private letter rulings in the library cite this provision yet.

Each row is a version of the text as published by the official source. Code dates are the edition/release point that first reflected the change; regulation dates are eCFR effective dates. The library checks the official sources automatically, so new versions appear here on their own; “run” opens the sync that recorded a version.

EffectiveThroughSourceAmended by
Apr 1, 1997currenteCFR editorial change effective 2016-05-18 run 2T.D. 6675, 28 FR 10121, Sept. 17, 1963View
Provision-level history (blame)