Example 2.
(i) Corporation X maintains a cash or deferred arrangement. The plan year is the calendar year. For plan year 1989, all 10 of X's employees are eligible to participate in the plan. The employees’ compensation, contributions, and actual deferral ratios are shown in the following table:
| Employee | Compensation | Contribution | Actual deferral ratio (percent) |
|---|
| A | $140,000 | $7,000 | 5.0 |
| B | 70,000 | 7,000 | 10.0 |
| C | 70,000 | 7,000 | 10.0 |
| D | 45,000 | 2,250 | 5.0 |
| E | 40,000 | 4,000 | 10.0 |
| F | 35,000 | 1,750 | 5.0 |
| G | 35,000 | 350 | 1.0 |
| H | 30,000 | 3,000 | 10.0 |
| I | 17,500 | 0 | 0 |
| J | 17,500 | 0 | 0.0 |
(ii) Employees A, B, and C are highly compensated employees within the meaning of section 414(q). Employees D, E, F, G, H, I, and J are nonhighly compensated employees. The actual deferral percentages for the highly compensated employees and nonhighly compensated employees are 8.33 percent and 4.43 percent, respectively. These percentages do not satisfy the requirements of section 401(k)(3)(A)(ii). The actual deferral percentage for the highly compensated employees may not exceed 6.43 percent.
(iii) The plan reduces the actual deferral ratios of B and C to 7.14 percent by distributing $2,002 ($7,000−.0714×$70,000) to each in January 1990. Section 401(k)(3)(A)(ii) is therefore satisfied.
(iv) In February 1990, B notifies X that B made elective deferrals of $2,000 under a qualified cash or deferred arrangement maintained by an unrelated employer in 1989, and requests distribution of $2,000 from X's plan. However, since B has already received a distribution of $2,002 to meet the ADP test, no additional amounts are required or are permitted to be distributed as excess deferrals by this plan, and the prior distribution of excess contributions has corrected the excess deferrals. But X must report $2,000 as a distribution of an excess deferral and $2 as a distribution of an excess contribution.