Brief Case
U.S. Tax Court

Caren Kohl, aka, Caren Rein v. Commissioner

T.C. Summary Opinion 2024-4 · Docket 26962-21S · Decided Apr 25, 2024 · Siegel · T.C. Summary Opinion
Rule 155 computation
Addresses I.R.C. § 72
United States Tax Court
T.C. Summary Opinion 2024-4

CAREN KOHL , a . k . a . , CAREN REIN , Petitioner v .

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ————— Docket N o. 269 6 2-21S . Filed April 25, 2024.

————— Caren Kohl, a . k . a . , Caren Rein , pro se.

David Choi , Mimi M. Wong , and Gennady Zilberman , for respondent.

SUMMARY OPINION

SIEGEL, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 74631 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the Petition was filed. Pursuant to section 7463(b) , the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this Opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s 2018 federal income tax resulting from her early withdrawal of funds from a retirement account , along with a ten-percent additional tax under section 72(t) . Because no exception to the imposition of the additional tax applies , we hold that petitioner is liable for it on the distribution.

Also g enerally , a distribution from a qualified retirement plan is includ i ble in gross income for the year of distribution . See §§ 61(a)(1 0 ) , ( b) , 72(a)(1), 402(a) , (b)(2), 408(d) (1 ) , 4974(c ) ; s ee also Darby v. Commissioner, 97 T.C. 51, 58 (1991) ; Czepiel v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999- 289 (explaining that a taxpayer must report a distribution from an individual retirement account as income unless a statutory exception applies) . Early retirement distributions, meaning those made before a taxpayer reaches age 59½ , are subject to a n additional ten -percent early withdrawal tax unless an exception applies. § 72(t) (1). Petitioner was not 59½ when she withdrew the money from her retirement plan , and no exception applies here .

To support her claim, petitioner points to section 72(t)(2)(I), enacted by the Consolidated Appropriations Act , 2023, P ub . L. No . 117-328, div. T, 136 Stat. 4459, 5296 (2022) . That provision exempt s certain withdrawals made for emergency expenses from the additional tax . However, section 72(t)(2)(I) applies only “ to distributions made after December 31, 2023. ” Consolidated Appropriation s Act § 115( c ) , 136 Stat . at 5297. It is not applicable to the distribution petitioner received in 2018. And because it is not, petitioner is liable for the additional tax on her early retirement plan distribution. T o reflect the foregoing, D ecision will be entered under Rule 155 .

Footnotes

1 Unless otherwise indicated, statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code, Title 26 U.S.C., in effect at all relevant times, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Served 04/25/24

2 Petitioner does not claim and the record does not show that the provisions of section 7491(a) are applicable, and we proceed as though they are not. Se c tion s 7491(c) and 6751(b) do not apply to sec tion 72(t). See El v. Commissioner, 144 T.C. 140 (2015) .

3 Petitioner ’s only argument in opposition to the imposition of the additional tax is that withdrawals made for economic hardship are exempt from it .

Sections addressed
Also cites
Related documents
  • Notice 2024-55
    Certain Exceptions to the 10 Percent Additional Tax Under Code Section 72(t)
  • PLR 200742010
    Annuities: Endowment and Life Insurance (Included v. Not Included in Gross Income)
  • PLR 202031008
    Annuities: Endowment and Life Insurance (Included v. Not Included in Gross Income)
  • PLR 201632004
    Included vs. Not Included in Gross Income
  • Notice 2016-39
    This notice provides guidance as to whether payments received by an employee from a quali…
  • Notice 2026-13
    Safe Harbor Explanations – Eligible Rollover Distributions
  • Notice 2024-2
    Miscellaneous Changes Under the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022
  • PLR 202625002
    Annuities: Endowment and Life Insurance (Included v. Not Included in Gross Income)