Brief Case
U.S. Tax Court

Magdy A. Ghaly & Laila Ryad v. Commissioner

T.C. Summary Opinion 2023-13 · Docket 27901-21S · Decided Apr 3, 2023 · Choi · T.C. Summary Opinion
United States Tax Court
T.C. Summary Opinion 2023-13

MAGDY A. GHALY AND LAILA RYAD , Petitioner s v .

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ————— Docket N o. 27901-21S . Filed April 3, 2023.

————— Magdy A. Ghaly and Laila Ryad , pro se .

R yan J. Lonergan and Thomas A. Deamus, for respondent.

SUMMARY OPINION

CHOI , Special Trial Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the P etition was filed.1

Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this O pinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

In a notice of deficiency dated J une 14 , 20 21 , the Internal Revenue Service (respondent) determined a deficiency in petitioners’ federal income tax of $ 38, 213 and a section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty of $ 4 , 7 97 for tax able year 2018.

II. Unreported Income

Section 61(a) provides that “gross income means all income from whatever source derived.” Gross income includes, but is not limited to, items such as compensation, annuities, income from life insurance and endowment contracts, and pensions. § 61(a)(1), (8), (9), (10).

Footnotes

1 Unless otherwise indicated, all statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code, Title 26 U.S.C., in effect at all relevant times , and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Served 04/03/23

2 Respondent conceded the section 6662(a) substantial understatement penalty in a status report filed November 9, 2022, in response to the Court’s October 13, 2022, Order.

3 The parties did not address whether sec tion 6201(d) applies to this case. Under sec tion 6201(d), if a taxpayer asserts a reasonable dispute with respect to an item of income reported on an information return filed by a third party and the taxpayer meets certa in other requirements, the Commissioner bears the burden of producing reasonable and probative evidence, in addition to the information return, concerning the deficiency attributable to the income item. Assuming arguendo that respondent bears the burden of production under sec tion 6201(d), we find that respondent has satisfied it.

4 The invoice is dated December 19, 2018, and shows that the entire $34,077 balance was outstanding at that time. Mr. Ghaly did not produce receipts, bank statements, canceled che cks, or any other proof of paying the $34,077. In addition to the medical bill for $34,0 77, Mr. Ghaly produced various other medical bills , some for Laila Ryad and Adam Ghaly, which show petitioners made copayments of $10 to $25 for medical visits in 2018 . He also produced a letter from a law firm showing that he entered into a payment plan for an outstanding Hackensack University Medical Center medical bill, which showed that petitioners had made a $195 payment toward the bill.

5 The Internal Revenue Code provides a deduction for taxes paid on real property , but not an exception to the 10% penalty on early withdrawal for taxes paid on real property . See §§ 164, 72(t).

Sections addressed
Also cites
Related documents
  • Notice 2024-55
    Certain Exceptions to the 10 Percent Additional Tax Under Code Section 72(t)
  • 89 FR 58886
    Required Minimum Distributions
  • Notice 2026-13
    Safe Harbor Explanations – Eligible Rollover Distributions
  • 87 FR 10504
    Required Minimum Distributions
  • Notice 2024-2
    Miscellaneous Changes Under the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022
  • PLR 200742010
    Annuities: Endowment and Life Insurance (Included v. Not Included in Gross Income)
  • Notice 2016-39
    This notice provides guidance as to whether payments received by an employee from a quali…
  • REG-108639-99
    Proposed regulations under sections 401(k) and 401(m) of the Code provide guidance on the…