Brief Case
DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges

Johnson Brothers Enterprises

Docket 1996-RIS-62 · Decided Oct 7, 1997 · Decision & Order Approving Stipulation &amp: Order of Dismis
Dismissed

UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of Administrative Law Judges

Menu

About OALJ

Overview

About the Chief Judge

FAQs

Organizational Chart

Contacts

Contacting OALJ

National Office

BALCA

District Offices:

Boston, MA

Cherry Hill, NJ

Cincinnati, OH

Covington, LA

Newport News, VA

Pittsburgh, PA

San Francisco, CA

Washington, DC

Keyword / Case Number Searches

DMS Search

Case Status

DOL Home > OALJ > ERISA > USDOL v. Johnson Brothers Enterprises, 96-RIS-62 (ALJ Oct. 7, 1997)

USDOL/OALJ Reporter

USDOL v. Johnson Brothers Enterprises, 96-RIS-62 (ALJ Oct. 7, 1997)

U.S. Department of Labor

Office of Administrative Law Judges

525 Vine Street - Suite 900

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Date: Oct. 7, l997

Case No. 96-RIS-62

In the matter of

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS

ADMINISTRATION,

Complainant,

v.

JOHNSON BROTHERS ENTERPRISES,

Respondent.

DECISION AND ORDER

APPROVING STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL This proceeding arises under §502(c)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of l974, as amended, (ERISA), and its implementing regulations at 29 C.F.R. Parts 2520 and 2570.

On October 3, l997, the parties submitted for approval by the undersigned a fully executed Stipulation For Dismissal And Order, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Having duly considered the matter,

[Page 2] IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation is hereby approved and the proceeding in this matter is DISMISSED, with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:

1. That this Order shall have the same force and effect as an order made after a full hearing;

2. That the entire record in which this Order is based shall consist solely of the Notice of Determination and this Stipulation and Order;

3. That the parties have waived any further procedural steps before the undersigned;

4. That the parties have waived any right to challenge or contest the validity of this Order and decision entered in accordance with their Stipulation and Order;

5. That each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and legal and accounting fees incurred in connection with this action; and,

6. That this decision and order shall be the final agency action in this matter.

DANIEL J. ROKETENETZ

Administrative Law Judge

UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

United States Department of Labor

Office of Administrative Law Judges

800 K St NW

Washington, DC 20001

(202) 693-7300

www.oalj.dol.gov

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

White House

USA.gov

NO FEAR Act Data

U.S. Office of Special Counsel

LABOR DEPARTMENT

Español

Office of Inspector General

Subscribe to the DOL Newsletter

Read the DOL Newsletter

Emergency Accountability Status Link

A to Z Index

ABOUT THE SITE

Freedom of Information Act

Privacy and Security Statement

Disclaimers

Important Website Notices

Plug-Ins Used on DOL.gov

Accessibility Statement

Also cites
Related documents
  • 81 FR 43430
    Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Catch-Up Adjustments
  • 84 FR 213
    Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Annual Adjustments f…
  • 82 FR 5373
    Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Annual Adjustments f…
  • 85 FR 2292
    Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Annual Adjustments f…
  • 75 FR 8796
    Civil Penalties Under ERISA Section 502(c)(8)
  • 80 FR 72014
    Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits
  • 81 FR 92316
    Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits
  • Richard Kelly v. Altria Client Services, LLC