Brief Case

Circular 230 § 10.76

Decision of Administrative Law Judge.
eCFR editorial change effective 2016-12-30 · current · last amended by T.D. 9527, 76 FR 32310, June 3, 2011
Amended effective Jul 1, 2012 by T.D. 9527, 76 FR 32310, June 3, 2011. See what changed
(a) In general
(1) Hearings. Within 180 days after the conclusion of a hearing and the receipt of any proposed findings and conclusions timely submitted by the parties, the Administrative Law Judge should enter a decision in the case. The decision must include a statement of findings and conclusions, as well as the reasons or basis for making such findings and conclusions, and an order of censure, suspension, disbarment, monetary penalty, disqualification, or dismissal of the complaint.
(2) Summary adjudication. In the event that a motion for summary adjudication is filed, the Administrative Law Judge should rule on the motion for summary adjudication within 60 days after the party in opposition files a written response, or if no written response is filed, within 90 days after the motion for summary adjudication is filed. A decision shall thereafter be rendered if the pleadings, depositions, admissions, and any other admissible evidence show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that a decision may be rendered as a matter of law. The decision must include a statement of conclusions, as well as the reasons or basis for making such conclusions, and an order of censure, suspension, disbarment, monetary penalty, disqualification, or dismissal of the complaint.
(3) Returns and return information. In the decision, the Administrative Law Judge should use the code assigned to third party taxpayers (described in § 10.72(d)).
(b) Standard of proof. If the sanction is censure or a suspension of less than six months' duration, the Administrative Law Judge, in rendering findings and conclusions, will consider an allegation of fact to be proven if it is established by the party who is alleging the fact by a preponderance of the evidence in the record. If the sanction is a monetary penalty, disbarment or a suspension of six months or longer duration, an allegation of fact that is necessary for a finding against the practitioner must be proven by clear and convincing evidence in the record. An allegation of fact that is necessary for a finding of disqualification against an appraiser must be proven by clear and convincing evidence in the record.
(c) Copy of decision. The Administrative Law Judge will provide the decision to the Internal Revenue Service's authorized representative, and a copy of the decision to the respondent or the respondent's authorized representative.
(d) When final. In the absence of an appeal to the Secretary of the Treasury or delegate, the decision of the Administrative Law Judge will, without further proceedings, become the decision of the agency 30 days after the date of the Administrative Law Judge's decision.
(e) Effective/applicability date. This section is applicable beginning August 2, 2011.
Source credit, amendments & notes

[T.D. 9359, 72 FR 54554, Sept. 26, 2007, as amended by T.D. 9527, 76 FR 32310, June 3, 2011]

Circular 230 § 10.76 — Decision of Administrative Law Judge. · eCFR editorial change effective 2016-12-30 · https://pensionresource.website/EAMain?content=EAMain.Law&id=cfr31-10.76 · printed Oct 16, 2026
On this page
  • (a) In general
  • (b) Standard of proof.
  • (c) Copy of decision.
  • (d) When final.
  • (e) Effective/applicability date.
Cited by (code & regs)

No guidance in the library cites this section yet.

No court rulings in the library cite this provision yet.

No private letter rulings in the library cite this provision yet.

Each row is a version of the text as published by the official source. Code dates are the edition/release point that first reflected the change; regulation dates are eCFR effective dates. The library checks the official sources automatically, so new versions appear here on their own; “run” opens the sync that recorded a version.

EffectiveThroughSourceAmended by
Jul 1, 1997Jun 30, 2003CFR 2001 annual edition (revised as of 2001-07-01) run 12759 FR 31528, June 20, 1994View
Jul 1, 2003Jun 30, 2008CFR 2007 annual edition (revised as of 2007-07-01) run 127View · Redline (sign in)
Jul 1, 2008Jun 30, 2011CFR 2010 annual edition (revised as of 2010-07-01) run 127T.D. 9359, 72 FR 54554, Sept. 26, 2007View · Redline (sign in)
Jul 1, 2011Jun 30, 2012CFR 2011 annual edition (revised as of 2011-07-01) run 127T.D. 9359, 72 FR 54554, Sept. 26, 2007View · Redline (sign in)
Jul 1, 2012currenteCFR editorial change effective 2016-12-30 run 5T.D. 9527, 76 FR 32310, June 3, 2011View · Redline (sign in)
Provision-level history (blame)