Brief Case

ERISA § 4209 (29 U.S.C. § 1389)

De minimis rule
USC 2024 ed., current through 2025-01-06 · current · last amended by Pub. L. 96-364
Amended effective Jan 6, 2017 by Pub. L. 96-364. See what changed
(a) Reduction of unfunded vested benefits allocable to employer withdrawn from plan Except in the case of a plan amended under subsection (b), the amount of the unfunded vested benefits allocable under section 1391 of this title to an employer who withdraws from a plan shall be reduced by the smaller of—
(1) ¾ of 1 percent of the plan's unfunded vested obligations (determined as of the end of the plan year ending before the date of withdrawal), or
(2) $50,000,
reduced by the amount, if any, by which the unfunded vested benefits allowable to the employer, determined without regard to this subsection, exceeds $100,000.
(b) Amendment of plan for reduction of amount of unfunded vested benefits allocable to employer withdrawn from plan A plan may be amended to provide for the reduction of the amount determined under section 1391 of this title by not more than the greater of—
(1) the amount determined under subsection (a), or
(2) the lesser of—
(A) the amount determined under subsection (a)(1), or
(B) $100,000,
reduced by the amount, if any, by which the amount determined under section 1391 of this title for the employer, determined without regard to this subsection, exceeds $150,000.
(c) Nonapplicability This section does not apply—
(1) to an employer who withdraws in a plan year in which substantially all employers withdraw from the plan, or
(2) in any case in which substantially all employers withdraw from the plan during a period of one or more plan years pursuant to an agreement or arrangement to withdraw, to an employer who withdraws pursuant to such agreement or arrangement.
(d) Presumption of employer withdrawal from plan pursuant to agreement or arrangement applicable in action or proceeding to determine or collect withdrawal liability In any action or proceeding to determine or collect withdrawal liability, if substantially all employers have withdrawn from a plan within a period of 3 plan years, an employer who has withdrawn from such plan during such period shall be presumed to have withdrawn from the plan pursuant to an agreement or arrangement, unless the employer proves otherwise by a preponderance of the evidence.
Source credit, amendments & notes

(Pub. L. 93–406, title IV, §4209, as added Pub. L. 96–364, title I, §104(2), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1225.)

ERISA § 4209 (29 U.S.C. § 1389) — De minimis rule · USC 2024 ed., current through 2025-01-06 · https://pensionresource.website/EAMain?content=EAMain.Law&id=usc29-1389 · printed Oct 16, 2026
On this page
  • (a) Reduction of unfunded vested benefits allocable to employer…
  • (b) Amendment of plan for reduction of amount of unfunded veste…
  • (c) Nonapplicability
  • (d) Presumption of employer withdrawal from plan pursuant to ag…
Cited by (code & regs)

No regulations are linked to this section in the library.

Guidance addressing this section

No documents are primarily about this section.

Also cited in 3 other documents
PBGC
Opinion Letters
Tax Court (0) · DOL/Federal (1)
DOL and federal courts (1)
Also cite this provision (1)

No private letter rulings in the library cite this provision yet.

Each row is a version of the text as published by the official source. Code dates are the edition/release point that first reflected the change; regulation dates are eCFR effective dates. The library checks the official sources automatically, so new versions appear here on their own; “run” opens the sync that recorded a version.

EffectiveThroughSourceAmended by
Jan 4, 1995Jan 6, 2011USC 1994 ed., current through 1995-01-04 run 49Pub. L. 96-364View
Jan 7, 2011Jan 5, 2017USC 2013 ed., current through 2014-01-16 run 13Pub. L. 96-364View · Redline (sign in)
Jan 6, 2017currentUSC 2024 ed., current through 2025-01-06 run 1Pub. L. 96-364View · Redline (sign in)
Provision-level history (blame)